Quoted Text

Your SAT Scores Are Determined By Your Family's Income — See This Revealing Graph
Eileen Shim's avatar image By Eileen Shim  42 minutes ago 6 COMMENTS  |  111 SHARES
0
On Wednesday, College Board announced its second-ever overhaul of the SAT exam, and some of the changes are pretty drastic.

By 2016, the scoring will revert back to the "out-of-1600" format, and the essay section will become optional. Students will no longer be penalized for incorrect answers. There will be less emphasis on obscure vocabulary and more on evidence-based reasoning. Reading passages will come from well-known texts, such as the Gettysburg Address or the "I Have a Dream" speech. There will be fewer math topics and more in-depth questions (and calculator bans on certain sections). And perhaps most importantly of all, the test will be offered both in print and digitally.

"No longer will it be good enough to focus on tricks and trying to eliminate answer choices," said College Board CEO David Coleman. "We are not interested in students just picking an answer, but justifying their answers."

While many of the changes will be welcomed by students, the question arises: What led College Board to institute such significant reforms? The simple answer: class divide.

According to College Board, low-income students face serious disadvantages when preparing for the SAT. And this meant that, on average, they scored lower than wealthier students on every section of the test. Take a look at the troubling graph below:



Image Credit: The Week

The difference between low-income and high-income students' scores is shocking. But what leads to such a vast divide? The disturbing reality is that the more money you invest in test prep, the better you're likely to score. The SAT requires students to be familiar with its format and style; students whose parents can afford expensive prep classes and private tutors are simply better prepared for the exam.

"[T]hese exams have become disconnected from the work of high school classrooms and surrounded by costly test preparation," said Coleman.

The essay requirement is perhaps the most tricky component because students need a ton of practice to write coherent essays under a time limit. Unlike the reading and writing sections, students cannot simply buy or borrow a prep book and score themselves; they need a human grader to assess their work and provide feedback — which may be when prep classes come in handy the most.

There are of course other institutional factors at work: wealthier families are likely to live in better school districts which offer SAT prep and counseling, while low-income neighborhoods' schools often lack even basic resources. Still, College Board wants to fix the elements that it can, and that means focusing less on rote memorization and more on critical thinking and analysis.

The SAT is also facing increasing competition from its rival test, the ACT, which recently surpassed it in popularity:



Image Credit: The Washington Post

In addition to changing the test format, College Board will also work with Khan Academy to offer free test prep material starting in 2015. Fee waivers will also be given to low-income students to apply to four colleges for free.

"What this country needs is not more tests, but more opportunities," Coleman said.

The finalized version of the new SAT, along with sample questions, will be available on April 16

Quoted from daveinomahafromrotterdam

Senders, sissiero and their ultraconservative buddies who live online have no say in this topic. They leech off the working class of this nation so they can stay in their mommie's basement playing all day on their mommie's computer.

Quoted from CICERO

Lol..."ultraconservative"...Anti-War, Anti-Drug Prohibition, Pro-Privacy, and Pro-Individual Liberty is "ultraconservative"...

Daveinomahafromrotterdam must have just returned from his part-time Rambo drill for the Guard...Now he's playing message board Rambo!LOL

Quoted from daveinomahafromrotterdam

Senders, sissiero and their ultraconservative buddies who live online have no say in this topic. They leech off the working class of this nation so they can stay in their mommie's basement playing all day on their mommie's computer.

Quoted Text

ADP SmartCompliance: Works with many leading payroll, HR and financial systems to help you meet some of today’s key tax, employment and payroll compliance needs.

Your commitments are growing but your resources are shrinking, and basic day-to-day activities are occupying the majority of your time. You also need to maintain compliance, mitigate risk, improve business process efficiencies and drive growth. You are simply stretched too thin.

Health Care

Employment Tax

Tax Credits

Wage Payments

Employment Verification

W2 Management

Unemployment Claims

Wage Garnishments

ADP can help. ADP SmartCompliance is a cloud-based platform
of outsourced services that works with leading payroll, HR
and financial systems to help you maintain compliance with key
tax, employment and payroll-related laws, mitigate risk, improve
efficiencies and drive growth. Its integrated capabilities help to
provide comprehensive compliance support for some of your key employment-related functions.

Quickly Expand Compliance to Mitigate Risk with ADP SmartCompliance
Imagine having access to a knowledgeable team of tax, compliance and payment professionals that scales with your needs. The ADP SmartCompliance modules and our dedicated professional support help you monitor calculation, filing and payment requirements that might affect your business. The result? You limit the number of departments and people involved in the tasks associated with every payroll cycle, helping to mitigate your exposure to financial risk.

See ADP SmartCompliance in action
PlaySee ADP SmartCompliance in action
Automate and Connect Your Data and Processes to Improve Efficiencies
ADP SmartCompliance helps organize your information into a single, cloud-based portal so your data is concise, actionable and at your fingertips. Innovative tools and scalability deliver the infrastructure to move beyond manual processes to help improve efficiency and accuracy in your employment-related tax, compliance and payment activities, so your team spends less time on administrative tasks and more on making smart decisions based on smart data.

New York Tax Insights
PlayWebinar: New York "Tax Insights"
Institute ROI-Driven Practices that Enable Organizational Growth
ADP SmartCompliance helps you quickly implement programs that can bring dollars into your organization while helping to reduce the administrative burden on your staff. Add to that the access you get to valuable business insights shared by our client community—comprised of many of the largest brands in the food and service, retail, telecommunications, and other industries—and you’re well on your way to a best-practice approach that helps promote growth.

Quoted Text

AS ROBOTS EVOLVE THE WORKFORCE, WILL LABOR LAWS KEEP PACE?

ekso-bionics-exoskeletonEvery day, robots pop up in more workplaces. Employers in industries from health care to food service are drawn to automation technology by the promise of greater productivity and lower costs. Up to half of the jobs in the United States could be rendered moot in coming years by quickly improving robotics technology, according to an Oxford University study.

Already, a number of manual workforces are using exoskeletons, notably those made by Ekso Bionics, to enable workers to safely perform more strenuous tasks. (Ekso mostly publicizes its devices medical uses, but it is a big player in industrial settings, too.)

White-collar workplaces have introduced robots, as well. Robots have even entered the operating room, helping doctors perform difficult surgeries. In some hospitals, robots move supplies and fill prescriptions. And one robot, Sedasys, replaces anesthesiologists during colonoscopies. (Katie Couric didn’t show us that part!) At some companies, a job candidate might interview with Sophie (or PaPeRo in her native Japan), a human resources interviewing robot designed to measure interviewees’ psychological responses along with their spoken answers.



In other words, humans aren’t just being replaced by robots, particularly as job descriptions adapt to new divisions of labor: A growing number will find themselves working alongside the droids.

In some cases, the robots create new jobs beyond those of the engineers who build them. For example, the International Federation of Robotics estimates that robots had, at the end of 2011, indirectly created roughly 4 million jobs.

Human staff and robots working side by side nevertheless raises some thorny legal issues. The workplace is a highly regulated space even in the laissez-faire United States, but automation is too new to have any explicit regulations on its use there. That gap has not gone unnoticed by the large employment law firm Littler Mendelson, which recently organized a conference and published a white paper guiding employers on the potential legal issues they will face as they build out their robotic staffs.

“[B]oth the developers of advanced robotics and the users of this essential technology need to anticipate and avoid legal landmines that threaten to explode as work and the workplace change,” the report cautions.

To be sure, Littler has a vested interest in warning of the potential for lawsuits. Still, a few issues in its comprehensive analysis of the troubles that next-gen robots could stir up seem to raise important questions about how best to make the shift to an automated workplace.

First, there’s injury. Many robotics makers are, for their part, working on how to design mobile machines to avoid or minimize collisions with humans. Still, there have already been several worker deaths related to robots, according to the Littler report. Two of them involved workers who needed to enter a robot’s established work area.

U.S. labor law generally does not allow workers to sue third parties for injuries sustained on the job, so the employer, not the manufacturer, would likely be liable for these and lesser injuries, according to Littler. That puts the burden on the company buying a robot to verify the manufacturer’s claims about the product before putting it to work — no small burden when the technology is so new.

Even the exoskeletons that designed to reduce worker injuries by supporting repeated moving and lifting could have the reverse effect, the report notes. After the devices have been used for a while, the employer’s expectations for how much work gets done in a day would likely rise.

“Certainly, as the use of such robots enhances workers’ physical capabilities, employers are likely to ratchet up their expectations and demands that workers perform more work, improve efficiency, and perform more physically demanding and dangerous tasks. If not carefully monitored, the benefit of robotics could be lost as the injury rate keeps pace with these heightened expectations and demands,” the report concludes.

And again there’s a chance of a substandard design, which, instead of supporting an ergonomically correct movement, forces workers into less than ideal postures. The employer would still likely be legally responsible.

Another interesting question raised by the paper: Could artificial intelligence be racist or ageist?

“Behavioral analysis and other forms of data acquired by robots could have a disparate impact on protected categories. When behavioral data is collected and compared to similar data about successful workers, unintended correlations can emerge that negatively impact candidates,” the report warns.

sophie-hr-robotUsed in human resources, algorithms sift through resumes to find the best-qualified candidates. If the algorithm was biased against particular characteristics related to age, race, sex or any other protected category, it would run afoul of labor law. But the bias could be an unintended side effect of prioritizing “role” over “position” or some other seemingly innocent decision.

Human resource robots, like Sophie, could inadvertently discriminate against a protected class if that class were more likely to experience particular physiological responses during an interview. A middle-aged woman experiencing a hot flash, for instance, could potentially be mistaken for someone experiencing anger or fear.

Employees with disabilities raise yet another issue. The Americans with Disabilities Act requires employers to provide “reasonable accommodations” to support workers with disabilities in doing their jobs. For instance, a visually impaired person could work in an office job using voice recognition software.

Could robots become “reasonable accommodations”? Yes, according to Littler, if there were a robot available at a reasonable price point to do what the employee needed done. Disabled employees are entitled to accommodation whether or not they specifically ask for it, which means all major employers may have to stay abreast of what contemporary robots can do and how much they cost. (Perhaps one of the human jobs that the industry is creating is robotics compliance officer.)

So companies facing economic incentives to invest in automation should also vet the potential costs of integrating them without running afoul of labor laws. And employees increasingly working with robots will likely see another round of scrutiny and potentially regulation related to the traditionally sticky issues of safety and non-discrimination.

Quoted from Box A Rox

Quoted from 55tbird

Funny he forgot to mention George Soros... Sanders an independent? LOL

Quoted from GrahamBonnet

Here is what I think of lazy bums who don't want to educate themselves or work harder: STARVE and do the world a favor. Starve long and slow if you want. There are too many lowlife scumbuckets on the planet and we need a few million less humans anyway. The race is getting so low and vile and disgusting and violent and dangerous that it will take care of itself. Nature won't be fooled.

Quoted from GrahamBonnet

Here is what I think of lazy bums who don't want to educate themselves or work harder: STARVE and do the world a favor. Starve long and slow if you want. There are too many lowlife scumbuckets on the planet and we need a few million less humans anyway. The race is getting so low and vile and disgusting and violent and dangerous that it will take care of itself. Nature won't be fooled.