So I guess the question is...Is violently threatening people in order to prevent them from listening to a speaker that these anti-Trump thugs disagree with a conservative or liberal action? Does suppressing free speech using threats of mob violence left wing or right wing?
I'll have to leave that decision up to you, since you seem to be the expert.
The answer is NEITHER. Protest is protest. It has nothing to do with RIGHT OR LEFT WING, or Conservative or Liberal.
As far as "suppressing free speech"??? (another lesson for Cicero) FREE SPEECH concerns GOVT SUPPRESSION of speech. Not a protester, or a neighbor, or your drunk uncle at the dinner table.
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
The answer is NEITHER. Protest is protest. It has nothing to do with RIGHT OR LEFT WING, or Conservative or Liberal.
As far as "suppressing free speech"??? (another lesson for Cicero) FREE SPEECH concerns GOVT SUPPRESSION of speech. Not a protester, or a neighbor, or your drunk uncle at the dinner table.
So these VIGILANTES that are blocking a person from freely assembling by creating road blocks and surrounding people's cars and threatening and carrying out acts of violence don't have an ideological identity? They are just an apolitical group of people that happen to agree they don't like Trump's hair and want to prevent people from looking at his hair?
I totally understand that in this case "the government" isn't suppressing freedom of assembly. But we do know that Soros groups are funding and organizing these vigilantes. And Bernie Sanders signs are seen being carried by these vigilantes that are suppressing and intimidating the Trump supporters. Similar to the role that Hitler's Brownshirts played.
I don't believe(and I have a feeling that you don't believe) that these vigilantes that are disrupting Trump events by using intimidation and violence are apolitical.
When the INSANE are running the ASYLUM In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the rule. -- Friedrich Nietzsche
“How fortunate for those in power that people never think.” Adolph Hitler
When the INSANE are running the ASYLUM In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the rule. -- Friedrich Nietzsche
“How fortunate for those in power that people never think.” Adolph Hitler
So these VIGILANTES that are blocking a person from freely assembling by creating road blocks and surrounding people's cars and threatening and carrying out acts of violence don't have an ideological identity? They are just an apolitical group of people that happen to agree they don't like Trump's hair and want to prevent people from looking at his hair?
An apolitical group??? I wouldn't say that. Why would you? AntiTrumpers are both conservative, liberal, Left & Right, all walks of American life from Mittens Romney To George Soros.
An 'apolitical group' would have no political views... hardly this group.
We could save a lot of time, if you'd just use a dictionary before you post.
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
An apolitical group??? I wouldn't say that. Why would you? AntiTrumpers are both conservative, liberal, Left & Right, all walks of American life from Mittens Romney To George Soros.
An 'apolitical group' would have no political views... hardly this group.
We could save a lot of time, if you'd just use a dictionary before you post.
Huh? In your previous post, you said the anti trumpers were NEITHER left wing or right wing, conservative or liberal. Your answer led me to believe they were apolitical vigilantes. Now you are saying these vigilantes are left/right conservative/liberal combined? Sorta like occupy Wall St teamed up with the tea party?
So anti trumpers are politically motivated with no left/right conservate/liberal ideology. They are some sort of hybrid?
Huh? In your previous post, you said the anti trumpers were NEITHER left wing or right wing, conservative or liberal. Your answer led me to believe they were apolitical vigilantes. Now you are saying these vigilantes are left/right conservative/liberal combined? Sorta like occupy Wall St teamed up with the tea party?
So anti trumpers are politically motivated with no left/right conservate/liberal ideology. They are some sort of hybrid?
For some people playing dumb is just a hobby... For Cicero it's his life's passion!
There are anti Trump/Pro Hillary people. There are anti Trump/Pro Bernie people. There are anti Trump/Pro Rubio people There are anti Trump/Pro Kasich people There are anti Trump/Pro Cruz people. And there are just anti Trump people.
The only thing they have in common is Anti Trump... But you already knew that Cicero. You just wanted one more excuse to practice your passion.
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
For some people playing dumb is just a hobby... For Cicero it's his life's passion!
There are anti Trump/Pro Hillary people. There are anti Trump/Pro Bernie people. There are anti Trump/Pro Rubio people There are anti Trump/Pro Kasich people There are anti Trump/Pro Cruz people. And there are just anti Trump people.
The only thing they have in common is Anti Trump... But you already knew that Cicero. You just wanted one more excuse to practice your passion.
Ohhhh...Now I understand! Supporters of the other candidates EXCEPT for Trump are vigilantes, and will block roads, threaten violence and disrupt Trump rallies as a way to intimidate his supporters. These anti trump vigilantes don't want to convince people to support their candidate, their sole purpose is to intimidate Trump supporters. These are the same tactics the Nazi Brownshirts used against their political adversaries. Hmmm...And Trump is the fascist?
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
It actually sounds like you finally realized that the handful of elites that control both major political parties share the exact same interests. That is maintaining their control of the federal government and subverting the will of the of the people my any and all means necessary(including intimidation). It's about power and control, and not governing to the will of the people.
It actually sounds like you finally realized that the handful of elites that control both major political parties share the exact same interests. That is maintaining their control of the federal government and subverting the will of the of the people my any and all means necessary(including intimidation). It's about power and control, and not governing to the will of the people.
The will of the people??? You don't believe in the "will of the people" or you'd vote to be included in your "will of the people". You only believe in ridicule and sarcasm. Protests is one demonstration of "the will of the people", so is voting.
You prefer to sit in the outfield bleachers yelling insults at the ref.
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
For rent: Downtown apartment, 2 bedrooms. Includes organic garden space, hot tub, great backyard. You can bring your dogs if they have references as good as yours. If voting for Donald Trump, do not call.
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
The will of the people??? You don't believe in the "will of the people" or you'd vote to be included in your "will of the people". You only believe in ridicule and sarcasm. Protests is one demonstration of "the will of the people", so is voting.
You prefer to sit in the outfield bleachers yelling insults at the ref.
There is no will of the people...Only the will of the two parties. You're right, I don't vote to give consent to the will of the corrupt parties. You on the other hand will give you consent to the jackboot thugs that will intimidate people to preserve the power of the two parties.
When the INSANE are running the ASYLUM In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the rule. -- Friedrich Nietzsche
“How fortunate for those in power that people never think.” Adolph Hitler
Logged
