|
|
 Admin |
|
Board Moderator
Posts
18,484
Reputation
64.00%
Reputation Score
+16 / -9
Time Online
769 days 23 minutes
|
Kansas court says sperm donor must pay child support
By Chandrika Narayan, CNN
updated 2:33 AM EST, Fri January 24, 2014
Court: Sperm donor to pay child support
(CNN) -- A Kansas sperm donor caught in the middle of a child support case says he wanted to help a lesbian couple when he made the donation nearly five years ago.
Instead, he may end up paying for his action.
A judge ruled that William Marotta must pay child support, even though he says he signed documents waiving his parental rights.
Shawnee County District Court Judge Mary Mattivi said on Wednesday that Marotta failed to conform to Kansas law, which says a licensed physician must be involved in an artificial insemination process, court documents show.
Sperm donor liable for child support
The documents show that the lesbian couple whom Marotta helped conceive a child say they performed the artificial insemination procedure at home...............>>>>...................>>>>....................http://www.cnn.com/2014/01/23/justice/kansas-sperm-donation/index.html?hpt=hp_t2 |
|
 Logged |
|
|
|
|
|
| Henry |
|
 Hero Member  Posts
6,058
Reputation
85.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -3
Time Online
2114 days 9 hours 31 minutes
|
Unbelievable, not sure if I feel sorry for this guy or not. Although if there was a signed agreement by all parties then that contract should of held. |
| "In the beginning of a change, the Patriot is a scarce man, brave, hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, however, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a Patriot." |
|
|
|
|
|
| sanfordy2 |
|
 Hero Member Posts
1,089
Reputation
100.00%
Reputation Score
+5 / -0
Time Online
89 days 15 hours 56 minutes
|
"say they performed the artificial insemination procedure at home" wow, somethings not right in dodge  |
|
|
|
|
|
| HarryP |
|
 Hero Member Posts
871
Reputation
50.00%
Reputation Score
+2 / -2
Time Online
35 days 22 hours 36 minutes
|
Turkey Baster??
Seriously messed up people. |
| We are advised NOT to judge ALL Muslims by the actions of a few lunatics, but we are encouraged to judge ALL gun owners by the actions of a few lunatics. Funny how that works. |
|
| Logged |
|
|
|
|
| sanfordy2 |
|
Hero Member Posts
1,089
Reputation
100.00%
Reputation Score
+5 / -0
Time Online
89 days 15 hours 56 minutes
|
lol...sodas on my keyboard now  |
|
|
|
|
|
| BuckStrider |
|
 Hero Member Posts
3,188
Reputation
76.47%
Reputation Score
+13 / -4
Time Online
71 days 23 hours 59 minutes
|
Unbelievable, not sure if I feel sorry for this guy or not. Although if there was a signed agreement by all parties then that contract should of held.
Kansas doesn't have a problem with the contract, it has a problem with it's implementation. I tend to agree with the ruling based on this logic.....
Quoted Text
Had a physician carried out the insemination, that would not be the case, because Marotta would be able to document that he was a sperm donor and not the lover of the girl's mother
|
|  "Approval ratings go up and down for various reasons... An example is the high post 911 support for
GWB even though he could be said to be responsible for the event." --- Box A Rox '9/11 Truther'
Melania is a bimbo... she is there to look at, not to listen to. --- Box A Rox and his 'War on Women' |
|
| Logged |
|
|
|
|
|
| Henry |
|
Hero Member Posts
6,058
Reputation
85.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -3
Time Online
2114 days 9 hours 31 minutes
|
The red flags should of been waving when Craigslist and sperm donation went into the same line |
| "In the beginning of a change, the Patriot is a scarce man, brave, hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, however, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a Patriot." |
|
|
|
|
|
| joebxr |
| January 24, 2014, 11:51am |
|
 Hero Member Posts
6,667
Reputation
70.00%
Reputation Score
+14 / -6
Time Online
276 days 6 hours 18 minutes
|
|
| Logged |
|
|
|
|
| Libertarian4life |
| January 24, 2014, 12:36pm |
|
 Hero Member Posts
7,356
Reputation
50.00%
Reputation Score
+12 / -12
Time Online
119 days 21 hours 10 minutes
|
Kansas doesn't have a problem with the contract, it has a problem with it's implementation. I tend to agree with the ruling based on this logic.....
Really? That's your take on it.
The contract is void because they didn't pay a government licensed doctor to squirt the turkey baster?
They forgot that only government authorized physicians may assist with insemination.
Rights no longer exist.
Only government permissions.
You can't make laws that require permission for your right to reproduce. |
|
| Logged |
|
|
|
|
| joebxr |
| January 24, 2014, 12:41pm |
|
Hero Member Posts
6,667
Reputation
70.00%
Reputation Score
+14 / -6
Time Online
276 days 6 hours 18 minutes
|
Quoted Text
...a physician would have tested the sperm for sexually transmitted diseases and certain genetic disorders....
|
| JUST BECAUSE SISSY SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO...BUT HE THINKS IT DOES!!!!! 
JUST BECAUSE MC1 SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO!!!!! |
|
| Logged |
|
|
|
|
| CICERO |
|
 Hero Member Posts
18,232
Reputation
68.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -8
Time Online
702 days 15 hours 7 minutes
|
Quoted Text
...a physician would have tested the sperm for sexually transmitted diseases and certain genetic disorders....
In a sane world, that would be the responsibility of the sperm recipient to make sure the bodily fluids they are recieving is clean. In that case, before anybody has sex, they must be tested by a state physician to make sure they meet government regulations. Incredible. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Box A Rox |
|
 Hero Member Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes
|
In a sane world, that would be the responsibility of the sperm recipient to make sure the bodily fluids they are recieving is clean. In that case, before anybody has sex, they must be tested by a state physician to make sure they meet government regulations. Incredible.
 CICERO WANTS 'GOVERNMENT' INSPECTORS TO INSPECT SPERM!!!
AND
HE WANTS 'GOVERNMENT' REGULATIONS TO ENSURE THE
SPERM MEETS 'GOVERNMENT' SPECS!!! |
| The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.
John Kenneth Galbraith
|
|
|
|
|
|
| joebxr |
|
Hero Member Posts
6,667
Reputation
70.00%
Reputation Score
+14 / -6
Time Online
276 days 6 hours 18 minutes
|
I made the necessary corrections for you!
In a sane the real world, that would be the responsibility of the sperm recipient and donor is to make sure the bodily fluids they are recieving is cleanthey are disease free. In that case, before anybody has sex, they must should be tested examined by a state trained, licensed physician to make sure they meet government regulations are provide the level of care the individuals should expect to receive . Incredible Fact.
|
| JUST BECAUSE SISSY SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO...BUT HE THINKS IT DOES!!!!!
JUST BECAUSE MC1 SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO!!!!! |
|
| Logged |
|
|
|
|
| CICERO |
|
Hero Member Posts
18,232
Reputation
68.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -8
Time Online
702 days 15 hours 7 minutes
|
CICERO WANTS 'GOVERNMENT' INSPECTORS TO INSPECT SPERM!!!
AND
HE WANTS 'GOVERNMENT' REGULATIONS TO ENSURE THE
SPERM MEETS 'GOVERNMENT' SPECS!!!
Read the article again...The state said the donor violated the law by not having the specimen tested. I said(listen closely) IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE WOMAN RECIEVING THE SPECIMEN TO HAVE IT TESTED BEFORE PUTTING IT INTO HER BODY. (I know, that's a crazy concept) A woman has a right to their body - except when they decide to put a strangers bodily fluids into it, now it needs to be regulated. Bizzare. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| CICERO |
|
Hero Member Posts
18,232
Reputation
68.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -8
Time Online
702 days 15 hours 7 minutes
|
I made the necessary corrections for you!
Corrections? Your corrections abdicated the personal responsibility of the recipient. The recipient entered into a contract without verifying the specimen. Whose fault is that? Man, is everybody a victim of their own ignorance? |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
