Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
Parisi's FOIL Goes Unanswered
Rotterdam NY...the people's voice    Rotterdam's Virtual Internet Community    Rotterdam Politics  ›  Parisi's FOIL Goes Unanswered Moderators: Admin
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 82 Guests

Parisi's FOIL Goes Unanswered  This thread currently has 10,081 views. |
13 Pages « ... 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 » Recommend Thread
senders
February 8, 2010, 4:58pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
29,348
Reputation
70.97%
Reputation Score
+22 / -9
Time Online
1574 days 2 hours 22 minutes
Quoted from 474
If anyone "set her up" it would be the people who asked her to commit an illegal act.  Or her, since she did it.


an illegal act at the expense of what to her???? no one MADE her do it......she is responsible for every word and stroke of pen or keyboard strike she makes....otherwise
she wouldn't be in that position......


...you are a product of your environment, your environment is a product of your priorities, your priorities are a product of you......

The replacement of morality and conscience with law produces a deadly paradox.


STOP BEING GOOD DEMOCRATS---STOP BEING GOOD REPUBLICANS--START BEING GOOD AMERICANS

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 165 - 193
Sombody
February 8, 2010, 7:50pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
2,049
Reputation
63.64%
Reputation Score
+7 / -4
Time Online
1813 days 10 hours 41 minutes
Quoted from black spidey
curious that giantsfan is  so opinonated in favor of the town board yet has no idea who Holly is...


His comment was specifically  regarding Holly's job title which includes  the word SECRETARY- and  usually requires that the  the person answer the friggin phone-


Oneida Elementary K-2  Yates 3-6
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 166 - 193
FactOrFiction
February 8, 2010, 7:59pm Report to Moderator
Guest User
Quoted Text
Democratic Rotterdam Town Supervisor Frank Del Gallo will be locked up on trumped up charges of activism during the Muscular Dystrophy Association's Lock Up event on Thursday, Feb. 18.

The newly elected supervisor will be locked up and under guard at 3 p.m. and has to raise his bail of $2400 before the event.


We're all so overtaxed in this town that none of us has money with which to bail out the Supervisor.  Perhaps, he'll make some
nice friends in the "slammer" and even learn to dance.  
Logged
E-mail Reply: 167 - 193
alleykat
February 8, 2010, 8:27pm Report to Moderator
Guest User
To all who read this forum:  I had heard that the new secretary had made back her salary by getting a grant for the town.  I was misinformed.  She has applied for a grant that would make back her salary but no one has heard the result as yet.  She, not the grant writer, wrote the grant.  Spoke with two people who said the information given was not correct.  I apologize for the misinformation.  I
thought the person I spoke with was an "insider."  Mea Culpa.
Logged
E-mail Reply: 168 - 193
bumblethru
February 8, 2010, 8:57pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
30,841
Reputation
78.26%
Reputation Score
+36 / -10
Time Online
412 days 18 hours 59 minutes
Ok....so let me see if I have this straight. The new secretary that is paid $50+K with taxpayers money has applied for a grant for approximately the same amount of money as her salary right? And the grant is paid with who's money? OURS!!!

So for any elementary school kid....the taxpayers are paying $50K+ for the secretary AND $50K+for a grant. Well, I believe that 'we the taxpayers' have just shelled out over $100 GRAND!

We're suppose to be happy folks! So bend over and smile!


When the INSANE are running the ASYLUM
In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the rule. -- Friedrich Nietzsche


“How fortunate for those in power that people never think.”
Adolph Hitler
Logged
Private Message Reply: 169 - 193
GiantsFan56
February 9, 2010, 1:06am Report to Moderator
Guest User
BT - If I am not mistaken the Grants are money you already paid.  If it didn't come to Rotterdam it would go someplace else.  The happy part would be atleast some of the money paid out would come back.
Logged
E-mail Reply: 170 - 193
senders
February 9, 2010, 4:41am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
29,348
Reputation
70.97%
Reputation Score
+22 / -9
Time Online
1574 days 2 hours 22 minutes
Quoted from 584
BT - If I am not mistaken the Grants are money you already paid.  If it didn't come to Rotterdam it would go someplace else.  The happy part would be atleast some of the money paid out would come back.


why 'grant' money

Quoted Text
Main Entry: 2grant
Function: noun
Date: 13th century
1 : the act of granting
2 : something granted; especially : a gift (as of land or money) for a particular purpose
3 a : a transfer of property by deed or writing b : the instrument by which such a transfer is made; also : the property so transferred
4 : a minor territorial division of Maine, New Hampshire, or Vermont originally granted by the state to an individual or institution


...you are a product of your environment, your environment is a product of your priorities, your priorities are a product of you......

The replacement of morality and conscience with law produces a deadly paradox.


STOP BEING GOOD DEMOCRATS---STOP BEING GOOD REPUBLICANS--START BEING GOOD AMERICANS

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 171 - 193
alleykat
February 9, 2010, 5:47am Report to Moderator
Guest User
Bumble-get over it!  Giants is right--the money will be coming HERE!
Logged
E-mail Reply: 172 - 193
Vaedur
February 9, 2010, 7:19am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
778
Reputation
75.00%
Reputation Score
+3 / -1
Time Online
16 days 4 hours 45 minutes
Quoted from 539
Bumble-get over it!  Giants is right--the money will be coming HERE!

Sounds like were getting a 50% lost on our investment.  Seriously they need my wife to manage our city's dollars, we'd buy buildings for 2 dollars off craigslist!



I don't spell check!  Sorry...
If you include "No offense" in a statement, chances are, your statement is offensive.
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 173 - 193
alleykat
February 9, 2010, 8:07am Report to Moderator
Guest User
No your math is off.  Guess none of you are in business.
Logged
E-mail Reply: 174 - 193
bumblethru
February 9, 2010, 8:35am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
30,841
Reputation
78.26%
Reputation Score
+36 / -10
Time Online
412 days 18 hours 59 minutes
It is our money.....plain and simple!

Wasn't that an issue for C. Lazz in her last attempted run? She accepted 'grant', taxpayer's money for her historic barn! That didn't rest well with most taxpayers.


When the INSANE are running the ASYLUM
In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the rule. -- Friedrich Nietzsche


“How fortunate for those in power that people never think.”
Adolph Hitler
Logged
Private Message Reply: 175 - 193
CICERO
February 9, 2010, 9:48am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
18,232
Reputation
68.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -8
Time Online
702 days 15 hours 7 minutes
The government takes our money through force, and we praise a patronage secretary for retrieving it.  Is it alley's assertion that party affiliation determines who gets grant money?  If it is, the system is broken.  We're played like puppets with our own money.  

What are we using the $50K for anyhow?


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 176 - 193
MobileTerminal
February 9, 2010, 9:53am Report to Moderator
Guest User
Quoted from CICERO
The government takes our money through force, and we praise a patronage secretary for retrieving it.  Is it alley's assertion that party affiliation determines who gets grant money?  If it is, the system is broken.  We're played like puppets with our own money.  

What are we using the $50K for anyhow?


To pay for the grant writer?
Logged
E-mail Reply: 177 - 193
basilhayden
February 9, 2010, 10:52am Report to Moderator
Guest User
Still not quite sure what the grant is for. Or if there is a grant at all. Anyone out there have any real facts about this grant? If you do let us know. Thanks
Logged
E-mail Reply: 178 - 193
huskyhowls
February 9, 2010, 11:01am Report to Moderator
Full Member
Posts
240
Reputation
80.00%
Reputation Score
+4 / -1
Time Online
1 days 18 hours 8 minutes
OUCH, MT!!!  Sad, but probably right on the money, our money of course!

The primary purpose of having something notarized is that the Notary is verifying that you personally came before them and signed the document.  Standard language.  That's why you sign in front of them and if they don't know you, you must provide ample identification.  What Eunice admitted to is egregious.  She's not broken the law just once, but numerous times.  I would expect that she would lose her Notary stamp at a minimum.  She could possibly be fined.  A Notary's job is public service, but you still must comply with the legal process.  She obviously didn't by her own self admission.  Makes you wonder what else hasn't been in compliance with the law.  
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 179 - 193
13 Pages « ... 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 » Recommend Thread
|


Thread Rating
There is currently no rating for this thread