Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
LETTER IN TODAY'S PAPER RE METROPLEX
Rotterdam NY...the people's voice    Rotterdam's Virtual Internet Community    Outside Rotterdam  ›  LETTER IN TODAY'S PAPER RE METROPLEX Moderators: Admin
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 201 Guests

LETTER IN TODAY'S PAPER RE METROPLEX  This thread currently has 460 views. |
1 Pages 1 Recommend Thread
mikechristine1
August 26, 2014, 2:37pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
9,074
Reputation
71.88%
Reputation Score
+23 / -9
Time Online
99 days 18 hours 36 minutes
A guy writes that 7 years ago his son went to see if Metroplex could help him to open a small business downtown.   Some young, but local person.

Metroplex asked what kind of business and apparently a restaurant.  Metroplex said no because there are too many restaurants already so they are not funding any more.

That was 7 years ago.

Funny, but in recent years it's quite obvious that Metroplex decided to dole money out for new restaurants - but of course those were owned by obvious political cronies with probably money to donate to political campaigns.

Interesting how local long time taxpaying businesses downtown were snubbed by Metroplex, how local average people with no political connections are snubbed.   But the politically connected get lavished with the money from financially struggling homeowners.   And politically connected cronies and tax deadbeats get all kinds of money and no punishments for failing to abide by legal contracts.

You can't make this stuff up!


Optimists close their eyes and pretend problems are non existent.  
Better to have open eyes, see the truths, acknowledge the negatives, and
speak up for the people rather than the politicos and their rich cronies.
Logged
Private Message
Libertarian4life
August 26, 2014, 6:25pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
7,356
Reputation
50.00%
Reputation Score
+12 / -12
Time Online
119 days 21 hours 10 minutes
SCHENECTADY
City backs land bank’s plan
Redevelopment push to focus on Eastern Ave.
BY KATHLEEN MOORE Gazette Reporter
   The City Council unanimously endorsed a plan Monday to focus on the Eastern Avenue neighborhood for revitalization.

   The local land bank is applying for a $3 million state grant to demolish 31 properties, all owned by the city, and offer small facade grants to homeowners.

   But the grant application required the support of the council, and council members gave it without hesitation Monday.

   It does mean that the city has chosen one neighborhood over the others for its first big redevelopment push, but Councilman Ed Kosiur said council members were satisfied with the land bank members’ rationale.

   Eastern Avenue was chosen because of its proximity to downtown and Union College, he said.

   “This is another gateway,” he added. “This is the first true example of Metroplex going into our neighborhoods, by partnering on this grant with the land bank.”

   He was delighted that any neighborhood had been chosen.

   “To finally get into our neighborhoods, ... it’s all great stuff. We’ve been talking about this since 2004. It’s taken a long time.”

   County Legislator and land bank member Robert Hoffman said focusing $3 million on one neighborhood would make a real impact.

   “We want to do as thorough a job in that neighborhood as we can,” he said.

   In addition to the removal of blighted, boarded-up and abandoned buildings, homeowners will be able to apply for facade grants of up to $5,000 for exterior work.

   The land bank and Metroplex will also work on marketing the vacant lots after demolishing them. Some might be sold for very little to neighbors who want to build a driveway or add a side yard. Others may be considered for community gardens, and many could become new commercial developments, Metroplex Development Chairman Ray Gillen said at a recent council committee meeting.

   “As more gets done on Eastern, more developers and investors will be interested,” he said.

   He added that Metroplex and the land bank are already working on plans for Elmer Elementary School, which is slated to be closed in September 2016.

   Kosiur wants the building turned into housing for veterans or seniors. The older part of the building must be torn down, he said, because of roof and foundation problems, but the newer portion could be reused.

   “We don’t need another empty building,” he said.

   Gillen said Metroplex is in “preliminary discussions” with the school district about the building.

   And while he declined to describe the options he was considering, he said reuse is a “great idea” for the school.

   If the land bank’s application is funded, it will come from money turned over to the state through foreclosure settlements. The state Attorney General’s Office just announced another settlement with banks for their role in the housing crisis, and some of that money will be made available to land banks for revitalization.
Logged
Private Message Reply: 1 - 10
mikechristine1
August 27, 2014, 8:47am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
9,074
Reputation
71.88%
Reputation Score
+23 / -9
Time Online
99 days 18 hours 36 minutes
Quoted Text
In addition to the removal of blighted, boarded-up and abandoned buildings, homeowners will be able to apply for facade grants of up to $5,000 for exterior work.



If the city dems and their cheerleader (who calls himself a conservative - HA HA) wouldn't have make the families making $40,000 a year paying for all of downtown and then pay for the property and school taxes of the millionaires and billionaires downtown, then homeowners would have had their own money to maintain their homes.

What is "façade" work anyway?   Painting a house?  Replacing wood with maintenance free siding?    What is it?   I'll bet it will be another dem scheme to force homeowners to use contractors and designers of the city/co/plex inner circle.  They will tell homeowners what can be done and will provide a list to them of their political cronies and say to homeowners, "if you want this grant money, you MUST choose from a contractor, designer, etc on this list."  So that will then be taxpayers handouts going to the favored political few.




Optimists close their eyes and pretend problems are non existent.  
Better to have open eyes, see the truths, acknowledge the negatives, and
speak up for the people rather than the politicos and their rich cronies.
Logged
Private Message Reply: 2 - 10
mikechristine1
August 27, 2014, 8:50am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
9,074
Reputation
71.88%
Reputation Score
+23 / -9
Time Online
99 days 18 hours 36 minutes
Quoted Text
Others may be considered for community gardens




Socialism at it's best


Optimists close their eyes and pretend problems are non existent.  
Better to have open eyes, see the truths, acknowledge the negatives, and
speak up for the people rather than the politicos and their rich cronies.
Logged
Private Message Reply: 3 - 10
bumblethru
August 27, 2014, 10:59am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
30,841
Reputation
78.26%
Reputation Score
+36 / -10
Time Online
412 days 18 hours 59 minutes

Quoted Text
   Gillen said Metroplex is in “preliminary discussions” with the school district about the building.


two tax supported entities making a deal.....with TAXPAYER'S money!!!
Ya just can't make this stuff up!!!


When the INSANE are running the ASYLUM
In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the rule. -- Friedrich Nietzsche


“How fortunate for those in power that people never think.”
Adolph Hitler
Logged
Private Message Reply: 4 - 10
MOONGLOW
August 27, 2014, 12:16pm Report to Moderator
Sr. Member
Posts
332
Reputation
100.00%
Reputation Score
+3 / -0
Time Online
11 days 5 hours 47 minutes
Always thought Plex was relegated to business related ventures.   How did this foray into residental neighborhoods come about?   Must read their By-laws.
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 5 - 10
Libertarian4life
August 27, 2014, 1:53pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
7,356
Reputation
50.00%
Reputation Score
+12 / -12
Time Online
119 days 21 hours 10 minutes
It's to justify the loans(unallocated spending) to demolish the vacant properties.
Logged
Private Message Reply: 6 - 10
firefox
August 27, 2014, 1:56pm Report to Moderator
Sr. Member
Posts
436
Reputation
80.00%
Reputation Score
+4 / -1
Time Online
5 days 13 hours 6 minutes
The $5,000 grant is a matching grant. Property owners has to shell out $5,000 out of their pocket before they can get $5,000 from Plex. Then when the work is done to the property your taxes will double up! Not worth it folks! Keep the $hit hole the way it is don't make no improvements because they will tax the hell out of you if you do so!
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 7 - 10
bumblethru
August 27, 2014, 2:18pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
30,841
Reputation
78.26%
Reputation Score
+36 / -10
Time Online
412 days 18 hours 59 minutes
Quoted from firefox
The $5,000 grant is a matching grant. Property owners has to shell out $5,000 out of their pocket before they can get $5,000 from Plex. Then when the work is done to the property your taxes will double up! Not worth it folks! Keep the $hit hole the way it is don't make no improvements because they will tax the hell out of you if you do so!


agree! It's not worth it.


When the INSANE are running the ASYLUM
In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the rule. -- Friedrich Nietzsche


“How fortunate for those in power that people never think.”
Adolph Hitler
Logged
Private Message Reply: 8 - 10
Libertarian4life
August 27, 2014, 4:38pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
7,356
Reputation
50.00%
Reputation Score
+12 / -12
Time Online
119 days 21 hours 10 minutes
Quoted from firefox
The $5,000 grant is a matching grant. Property owners has to shell out $5,000 out of their pocket before they can get $5,000 from Plex. Then when the work is done to the property your taxes will double up! Not worth it folks! Keep the $hit hole the way it is don't make no improvements because they will tax the hell out of you if you do so!


So they will likely raise the assessed value immediately following the work being completed.

That will raise the taxes a couple hundred dollars a year.

Logged
Private Message Reply: 9 - 10
mikechristine1
August 27, 2014, 5:33pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
9,074
Reputation
71.88%
Reputation Score
+23 / -9
Time Online
99 days 18 hours 36 minutes
Quoted from Libertarian4life


So they will likely raise the assessed value immediately following the work being completed.

That will raise the taxes a couple hundred dollars a year.




But think of this.  You are assessed now at $100,000.  But your market value is only $75,000.   You do the $5,000 in work, or $10,000 if it's a mandate ,atching, so they would perhaps raise the assessment value to say $106,000.   But wait wait, you only did work that raised your market value from $75,000 to maybe $80,000.

And the mayor and unqualified assessor will say "tough sh*t"  

Then you ask about the Proctors employee who got all that money, no requirement to repay in 30 years, hasn't pay taxes in 3 years, violating the conditions of the interest-free mortgage and why isn't his house assessed more?   And the mayor and unqualified assessor will say "tough sh*t"




Owning a residential house in Schenectady.            


Optimists close their eyes and pretend problems are non existent.  
Better to have open eyes, see the truths, acknowledge the negatives, and
speak up for the people rather than the politicos and their rich cronies.
Logged
Private Message Reply: 10 - 10
1 Pages 1 Recommend Thread
|

Rotterdam NY...the people's voice    Rotterdam's Virtual Internet Community    Outside Rotterdam  ›  LETTER IN TODAY'S PAPER RE METROPLEX

Thread Rating
There is currently no rating for this thread