FINALLY, we are back to Cicero's original post... the one he's been running from since he posted it.
Human life is exactly that. Living cells that are human. Human life is, obviously, not a HUMAN BEING. If I kill one blood cell, I haven't killed a HUMAN BEING, nor if I kill a clump of human cells... say fat cells, I haven't killed a HUMAN BEING... I've killed HUMAN CELLS.
So to Cissy's original question... Some Human life never becomes a HUMAN BEING. Some after much development will often become a HUMAN BEING. A human zygote, most of the time, does not become a HUMAN BEING... and of course a HUMAN ZYGOTE IS NOT A HUMAN BEING. OBVIOUSLY! Just as a fertilized chicken egg is not a chicken. It may or may not become a chicken one day, but they are two distinct and different things.
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
FINALLY, we are back to Cicero's original post... the one he's been running from since he posted it.
Human life is exactly that. Living cells that are human. Human life is, obviously, not a HUMAN BEING. If I kill one blood cell, I haven't killed a HUMAN BEING, nor if I kill a clump of human cells... say fat cells, I haven't killed a HUMAN BEING... I've killed HUMAN CELLS.
So to Cissy's original question... Some Human life never becomes a HUMAN BEING. Some after much development will often become a HUMAN BEING. A human zygote, most of the time, does not become a HUMAN BEING... and of course a HUMAN ZYGOTE IS NOT A HUMAN BEING. OBVIOUSLY! Just as a fertilized chicken egg is not a chicken. It may or may not become a chicken one day, but they are two distinct and different things.
You still haven't defined when human BEINGS come into existence. You keep on saying it's obvious, but you never post the obvious explanation.
The zygote doesn't exist with out human skin cells.
Cissy, why play with words. A zygote is not a human being. It may become one some day but it isn't a human being at conception. Again we both agree but you persist.
a tadpole is not a frog...however, we could expand this to say a tadpole is not a frog unless a scientist says so...much like a government tells you when you are human/citizen/taxpayer etc....
humans are a resource.....that's not scientific....
Chinese tradition counts age from conception......being human and being a citizen are 2 different things.....ask yourself, does the state get to decide when you 'start', because basically that is what you are saying....the state gets to tell you everything you are allowed to do, frozen or not.....I don't disagree with abortion or 'pro-life" because you are BOTH saying the same thing....the state gets to decide who/what/when you are.....AND what you get to do, when you get to do it and how you get to do it.....
Box thinks freedom exists in only in the choice of the person getting the abortion regardless of the rest of the hive(mother, father grandmother, grandfather, brother, sister, etc etc), I find this interesting, because then Box believes that the state gets to decide if you can vote/have alcohol/go to war/have a gun etc etc......
DVOR thinks freedom exists in 'only the government mandating the birth of a human',,,,,other wise the same exists for both of them in their belief of the state's interference in a sovereign human's life.....
both of them base their human sovereignty upon the STATE'S APPROVAL OF WHO WE ARE.....
interesting....this would lead me to believe that both think no one is worth anything without the state which means no human has a right to exist without the state's approval....
no value no job no food no housing no water etc etc etc......
you are both sad.....
you want someone to decide when 'you' are......it's probably not PC to say that if you were aborted you wouldn't be able to count your testicles every day......
...you are a product of your environment, your environment is a product of your priorities, your priorities are a product of you......
The replacement of morality and conscience with law produces a deadly paradox.
STOP BEING GOOD DEMOCRATS---STOP BEING GOOD REPUBLICANS--START BEING GOOD AMERICANS
you want someone to decide when 'you' are......it's probably not PC to say that if you were aborted you wouldn't be able to count your testicles every day......
I don't want any authority to decide. But I don't want the state authority dehumanizing human life through public school indoctrination and planned parenthood government subsidized propaganda by describing a fertilized egg like its a wart or a skin tag that can be removed by a dermatologist. If someone wants an abortion, they should be fully aware of the fact that it is an individual organism separate from the mother and father.
I don't want any authority to decide. But I don't want the state authority dehumanizing human life through public school indoctrination and planned parenthood government subsidized propaganda by describing a fertilized egg like its a wart or a skin tag that can be removed by a dermatologist. If someone wants an abortion, they should be fully aware of the fact that it is an individual organism separate from the mother and father.
exactly....Box and DVOR are hell bent on getting government approval as to the value.......
they are both one in the same and very good products brought forth by both the church and the public schools.....
a quarter is money so money is a quarter a church is a government so a government is a church
Box is DVOR so DVOR is Box.....so they must be both the church and the state......
...you are a product of your environment, your environment is a product of your priorities, your priorities are a product of you......
The replacement of morality and conscience with law produces a deadly paradox.
STOP BEING GOOD DEMOCRATS---STOP BEING GOOD REPUBLICANS--START BEING GOOD AMERICANS
You still haven't defined when human BEINGS come into existence. You keep on saying it's obvious, but you never post the obvious explanation.
Did I say it was "OBVIOUS"? I must have missed that!
Science knows that some time during the journey from sperm and egg, the resulting cluster of cells ends up a Human Being. It happens in stages and there is no definitive exact day when science can say it's human being. Many use the view that when the fetus can survive outside of the womb, it is then a human being. As Joe pointed out above:
Quoted Text
The period of the zygote lasts for about four days. Around the fifth day, the mass of cells becomes known as a blastocyst. The germinal period will last for fourteen days, after which the embryonic period will begin. The second period of development lasts from two weeks after conception through the eighth week, during which time the organism is known as an embryo. At the ninth week post-conception, the fetal period begins. From this point until birth, the organism will be known as a fetus.
And here is the part that Cicero denies... through this whole time, the joined egg and sperm are LIFE. Science doesn't call that LIFE a HUMAN BEING, but it's still HUMAN LIFE!
So Cissy when is the clump of cells a HUMAN BEING???? Do you know???
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
You still haven't defined when human BEINGS come into existence. You keep on saying it's obvious, but you never post the obvious explanation.
I must have missed it if you have presented your stance, but Sissy, when do you believe human BEINGS come into existence? And is that the point that life starts? Can you clarify it that? At what stage, what point, what physical element, what, what, what?
JUST BECAUSE SISSY SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO...BUT HE THINKS IT DOES!!!!! JUST BECAUSE MC1 SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO!!!!!
at which time they can all be transferred to a test tube....OUTSIDE the WOMAN'S body....
can a mongoloid live outside the woman's body? should it?
because I have to say that both BOX and DVOR think it's that easy/simple, wham bam thank you ma'am.....
so is Box ok with chromosomal choosing....not that Box would have that choice(neither would DVOR). or even this choice:
Quoted Text
Testing Options for Chromosomal Abnormalities and Birth Defects Introduction Almost all children in the United States are born healthy. Out of 100 newborns, only two or three have major birth defects. A birth defect is a physical problem that is present at birth. It also is called a congenital disorder or malformation. For approximately 70% of babies born with birth defects, the cause is unknown. In other cases, birth defects are inherited through genes or chromosomes.
Birth defects are caused by an error in the way the baby develops. A birth defect may affect how the body looks, works, or both. Many birth defects are mild, but some can be severe. Babies with birth defects may need surgery or medical treatment. They might be mentally disabled, physically disabled, and/or have a shortened life span. Most birth defects occur at conception or during the first 3 months of pregnancy. Some birth defects can be found before birth with special tests. Others might not be diagnosed until birth or later in life.
We will be offering you different tests at specific times during the pregnancy which will detect many birth defects. Even if you have all the tests outlined below, there can be no guarantee that your baby will not have a birth defect; however, if the tests show your baby to be at "low risk", the chance of the baby having a birth defect is very small.
Below are the different options available at this time for testing for birth defects.
Anatomical Fetal Ultrasound At about 18-21 weeks we strongly encourage every patient to have a high level ultrasound by a specialist to make sure that the baby's organs are developing properly. The scan will look at many organs including the brain, kidneys, heart, bladder, spine, and stomach. At this time, if you want to find out the sex of the baby, you can. If the baby is found to have an abnormality of one or more organs, further tests might be recommended. If the baby has a serious abnormality, the doctor will explain how this may affect your child's health and functioning. For some birth defects, we may recommend specific management such as delivery at a specialized hospital, closer surveillance of the baby during the pregnancy or other treatments to improve the outcome for your baby. If the birth defect has very serious implications, you might be given the option of terminating the pregnancy, if that would be the right choice for you.
Screening for Chromosomal Abnormalities All patients will be given the option of testing for chromosomal abnormalities. As a woman ages, there is a slowly increasing chance that the baby will have an abnormal number of chromosomes. If we calculate your chance of delivering a baby with an abnormal number of chromosomes to be less than 1 chance in 200 (0.5%), we will offer you noninvasive testing (an ultrasound and blood tests) that will recalculate your risks based on your age and the result of those tests. This test is called Sequential Screen. This is a sonogram of your baby at a very specific time in the pregnancy – between 11 and 13 ½ weeks, a blood test on you at the same time, and then a second blood test on you at about 16 weeks. In this sonogram, the radiology tech is doing a measurement called Nuchal Translucency where the amount of fluid under the skin of the baby's neck is measued. Babies who have an abnormal number of chromosomes tend to have an increased amount of fluid in this area at that gestational age. If these tests show that your risk is increased, we will refer you for further testing as described below for women who are at increased risk, to determine if there is an abnormality. The Sequential Screen will detect about 90% of chromosomal abnormalities with a 3.5% false positive rate (3.5% of women who are tested will be referred for further testing and it will be determined with those tests that the baby is normal). The Sequential Screen will also detect 80% of open neural tube defects (incomplete closure of the fetal spine which can cause spina bifida or anencephaly). If it is too late to do the testing at 11 – 13 ½ weeks, the second part of the test, which is a blood test at around 16 weeks can be done alone (MSS4). This will detect 75-80% of chromosomal abnormalities and 80% of open neural tube defects. The results for each of these tests are usually available within two weeks.
Testing For Women at Increased Risk for a Baby with Chromosomal Abnormalities If we calculate your risk of having a baby with a chromosomal abnormality to be increased (that is, if it is greater than about 0.5% or 1 chance in 200), we will refer you to a genetic counselor so they can go over your specific risks and discuss testing options. Women who would be considered at increased risk include: maternal age greater than 35 at delivery or paternal age greater than 55, a prior child or pregnancy loss with a chromosomal abnormality, or an abnormal Sequential screen or MSS4. Most women elect to start out with noninvasive testing which will include a blood test called Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT). Blood is drawn from your arm like any other blood test. This test is able to pick up your fetus' "free DNA" and from that detect some of the most common chromosomal abnormalities including Trisomy 21 (Down's syndrome), Trisomy 18, Trisomy 13 and sex chromosome abnormalities. This test is 80-99% accurate depending on the specific abnormality they are looking for. The result of this test is available within about two weeks. They are also able to determine the sex of the baby. A specialized sonogram along with this blood test will pick up most chromosomal abnormalities. If the above tests indicate that it is highly likely that your baby has an abnormality, or if you are at increased risk and request it, you can have a test called Amniocentesis. In this test, a needle is passed through your abdomen to collect some of the amnionic fluid surrounding the baby. Fetal cells that have been sloughed off into the fluid are collected and "grown" to evaluate the baby's chromosomes. It usually takes 2-3 weeks for the final results, although preliminary results might be available within 10 days. Because this procedure is invasive, it carries a small chance of complications (0.3-1%) such as infection, ruptured membranes, miscarriage or failure of the cells to grow.
Cystic Fibrosis Screening Cystic Fibrosis is a recessive genetic disorder that affects about 1 in 3,500 births. A person who has cystic fibrosis has TWO abnormal genes – one abnormal gene from their mother and one from their father. Most people who carry this gene have no family history of cystic fibrosis. A person who has cystic fibrosis (has two abnormal genes) has abnormally thick mucous and can have respiratory and gastrointestinal problems. Sometimes these problems are very severe and can require hospitalizations, extensive home care or a shortened life span. The chance of carrying the gene with no family history varies depending on your ethnic origin. Caucasians and people of Eastern European Jewish decent (Ashkenazi) have the highest carrier rate – about 1 in 25 compared to Hispanic with a 1 in 58 chance, African American with 1 in 61 chance and Asians with a 1 in 94 chance.
We will give you the option of being tested to see if you are a carrier. If you are a carrier, we will check the baby's father. If you are both carriers there is a 25% of having an affected child and you could elect to have amniocentesis to see if your fetus has two abnormal genes. There is no way to improve or change the outcome once you are pregnant, however, if you desired, you could terminate a pregnancy if it was determined that the fetus had two abnormal genes and would have cystic fibrosis. If you would like to be tested to see if you are a carrier, let us know.
...you are a product of your environment, your environment is a product of your priorities, your priorities are a product of you......
The replacement of morality and conscience with law produces a deadly paradox.
STOP BEING GOOD DEMOCRATS---STOP BEING GOOD REPUBLICANS--START BEING GOOD AMERICANS
The period of the zygote lasts for about four days. Around the fifth day, the mass of cells becomes known as a blastocyst. The germinal period will last for fourteen days, after which the embryonic period will begin. The second period of development lasts from two weeks after conception through the eighth week, during which time the organism is known as an embryo.
At the ninth week post-conception, the fetal period begins.
AMNIOCENTESIS FOR GENETIC DEFECTS/CHROMOSOMAL CHOICE IS DONE AT 11 WEEKS
From this point until birth, the organism will be known as a fetus.
your flippant answers mean nothing
...you are a product of your environment, your environment is a product of your priorities, your priorities are a product of you......
The replacement of morality and conscience with law produces a deadly paradox.
STOP BEING GOOD DEMOCRATS---STOP BEING GOOD REPUBLICANS--START BEING GOOD AMERICANS
I must have missed it if you have presented your stance, but Sissy, when do you believe human BEINGS come into existence? And is that the point that life starts? Can you clarify it that? At what stage, what point, what physical element, what, what, what?
Ask box a Rox. He knows a fertilized human egg isn't a human being. I'm waiting to get a clear definition of when it is. I've taken my position. A fertilized egg is an individual organism with its own separate DNA, it is human life. I'll let box let you know when it is a "being".
Ask box a Rox. He knows a fertilized human egg isn't a human being. I'm waiting to get a clear definition of when it is. I've taken my position. A fertilized egg is an individual organism with its own separate DNA. I'll let box let you know when it is a "being".
Didn't ask Box, asked you. Looking for your position, which you seem to not want to provide????? You've complained that I ask questions but don't give my position, so why are you immune from doing it???
JUST BECAUSE SISSY SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO...BUT HE THINKS IT DOES!!!!! JUST BECAUSE MC1 SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO!!!!!
Didn't ask Box, asked you. Looking for your position, which you seem to not want to provide????? You've complained that I ask questions but don't give my position, so why are you immune from doing it???
Yes, I know...You are redirecting a question that your nam buddy won't answer. I've given my position, I don't differentiate between an individual organism with its own DNA in the form of a zygote from a "being". That is box's nuanced position. Try to pin him down to find out when the human BEING is realized. Than get back to me.
Hey bud...What's you position on it? Based on your posts, it's possible that haven't fully developed into a human "being".
Ask box a Rox. He knows a fertilized human egg isn't a human being. I'm waiting to get a clear definition of when it is. I've taken my position. A fertilized egg is an individual organism with its own separate DNA, it is human life. I'll let box let you know when it is a "being".
Cicero YOU ASKED A QUESTION. I answered it in my last post. But you have not.
Can I ask... In Your OPinion, is a human zygote a Human Being??? Please let us know your position.
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith