So it's ok to "be a jerk" to male interviewer? Are men supposed to answer questions differently when asked by women?
So much for equality...the left makes it sound like women can't handle interviews with male guests. So much for breaking that glass ceiling.
Paul isn't a jerk to male interviewers. Just the females. Paul, like many Republicans deny this is part of their GOP War On Women, but it's obvious. Probably why so few Republican and Independent women support Paul. I wonder how many more women will turn away from Baby Paul since his LIES about Shultz?
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
Paul isn't a jerk to male interviewers. Just the females. Paul, like many Republicans deny this is part of their GOP War On Women, but it's obvious. Probably why so few Republican and Independent women support Paul. I wonder how many more women will turn away from Baby Paul since his LIES about Shultz?
I see the strategy...hope it works for you. The question will be, do American women run away from Paul because of his tone toward a female interviewer and run toward Hillary who takes millions of dollars from Arab countries that stone women for adultery.
I see the strategy...hope it works for you. The question will be, do American women run away from Paul because of his tone toward a female interviewer and run toward Hillary who takes millions of dollars from Arab countries that stone women for adultery.
"The Question Is"... nothing about Rand Paul. IMO, he will never be on the ticket, unless he's a VP.
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
Paul isn't a jerk to male interviewers. Just the females. Paul, like many Republicans deny this is part of their GOP War On Women, but it's obvious. Probably why so few Republican and Independent women support Paul. I wonder how many more women will turn away from Baby Paul since his LIES about Shultz?
Seriously? You lefty jihadis have failed so hard with the whole 'War on Women' meme.
"Approval ratings go up and down for various reasons... An example is the high post 911 support for GWB even though he could be said to be responsible for the event." --- Box A Rox '9/11 Truther'
Melania is a bimbo... she is there to look at, not to listen to. --- Box A Rox and his 'War on Women'
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
Rand Paul: “Charles and David Koch are well known for their business success, their generous philanthropic efforts and for their focus on innovation in management. Some also know them for their activism in the political realm. All of these are important contributions to society. What is under appreciated is their passion for freedom and their commitment to ideas. Unlike many crony capitalists who troll the halls of Congress looking for favors, the Kochs have consistently lobbied against special-interest politics.”
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
The Dumbest Abortion Debate Yet (No Wonder Cissy Loves It!) The abortion debate has long been nuanced and highly emotional, which is why it deserves better than the current bickering between Senator Rand Paul and DNC Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz. Most Americans believe that abortion should be legal but vary in their support for the legality of the procedure during the second and third trimesters of pregnancy. It’s a broad consensus that still leaves room for heated debate over state-level restrictions.
But if you’ve been listening to the spitting match this past week between Rand Paul and DNC Chairman Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fla.), the abortion debate is about accusing each other of murder on cable television.
Paul has suggested that Wasserman Schultz and the DNC endorse the “killing” of babies and Wasserman Schultz has, in turn, insinuated that Paul would be willing to “let a woman die” if her life were endangered by pregnancy.
Lives are indeed at stake in the abortion debate but turning a complex conversation into a childish game of ideological chicken doesn’t help either party’s position.
In 2015, the abortion debate deserves better than this
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
Lol - DNC surrogates in the media are providing cover for Deathermann-Shultz. Deathermann trying to walk back her answer. Suddenly the "war on women" and the abortion debate is a dumb debate.
Box, you posted many posts claiming Rand Paul was propsing legislation outlawing abortion. Now it's a dumb debate to ask the DNC chair if a 7 pound baby in the womb is a life and has a right to constitutional protection?
Debbie's on record saying its up to the mother and doctor to determine if a 7 pound baby in the womb lives or dies. Pretty extreme position.
Lol - DNC surrogates in the media are providing cover for Deathermann-Shultz. Deathermann trying to walk back her answer. Suddenly the "war on women" and the abortion debate is a dumb debate.
Box, you posted many posts claiming Rand Paul was propsing legislation outlawing abortion. Now it's a dumb debate to ask the DNC chair if a 7 pound baby in the womb is a life and has a right to constitutional protection?
Debbie's on record saying its up to the mother and doctor to determine if a 7 pound baby in the womb lives or dies. Pretty extreme position.
Yes it's up to the mom and her doctor to decide of a fetus is aborted. With Rand Paul's War On Women, he would take away the option of aborting the fetus to save the mom's life. Pretty extreme position don't you think?
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
Yes it's up to the mom and her doctor to decide of a fetus is aborted. With Rand Paul's War On Women, he would take away the option of aborting the fetus to save the mom's life. Pretty extreme position don't you think?
I guess...if unconditionally killing 7 pound babies in the womb during the 3rd trimester is mainstream. Polling data doesn't show that.
I wonder if killing a FEMALE 7 pound baby in the womb is a "war on women"?
BTW...Can you show me where Paul says he wants to take away the option for aborting the fetus to save the mom's life? Aborting fetus' to protect the life of the mother was even legal before the Roe v. Wade decision.
BTW...Can you show me where Paul says he wants to take away the option for aborting the fetus to save the mom's life? Aborting fetus' to protect the life of the mother was even legal before the Roe v. Wade decision.
No I can't. I wonder why Rand Paul (as president) won't say that he is in favor of abortion to save a mom's life. When asked he just ducks the question.
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
No I can't. I wonder why Rand Paul (as president) won't say that he is in favor of abortion to save a mom's life. When asked he just ducks the question.
Why did you make that claim then? Paul proposed giving constitutional right to life for the fetus. He didn't propose taking away a woman's right to life in that proposal. Just like "stand your ground", there are situations a person can take a life to protect their live, by taking the life that threatens them. But it is state laws that determine that.
Why did you make that claim then? Paul proposed giving constitutional right to life for the fetus. He didn't propose taking away a woman's right to life in that proposal. Just like "stand your ground", there are situations a person can take a life to protect their live, by taking the life that threatens them. But it is state laws that determine that.
Rand Paul won't say when he is FOR exceptions which would allow the death of a 7 pound fetus. He doesn't say that he would allow it or if he wouldn't allow it, he just ducks behind this 7 pound fetus and hides. So what is Rand Paul's stand on abortion to save the life of the mom, or abortion in the case of rape or incest. Inform us all to Rand Paul's "exceptions" that would allow abortion.
The last that I heard from ole Randy said there could be "thousands of exceptions" to any abortion ban. but he won't name one of those "exceptions". I guess if a woman needs an abortion to save her life, she first has to call Randy and see if her case is on his list!
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
Rand Paul won't say when he is FOR exceptions which would allow the death of a 7 pound fetus. He doesn't say that he would allow it or if he wouldn't allow it, he just ducks behind this 7 pound fetus and hides. So what is Rand Paul's stand on abortion to save the life of the mom, or abortion in the case of rape or incest. Inform us all to Rand Paul's "exceptions" that would allow abortion.
The last that I heard from ole Randy said there could be "thousands of exceptions" to any abortion ban. but he won't name one of those "exceptions". I guess if a woman needs an abortion to save her life, she first has to call Randy and see if her case is on his list!
I can't disagree. There are thousand of exception. Debbie and the DNC says there are NO LEGAL EXCEPTIONS. Not one. A 7 pound baby in the womb has no legally protected rights according to democrats.
Logged
