Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
Income Inequity
Rotterdam NY...the people's voice    Rotterdam's Virtual Internet Community     Chit Chat About Anything  ›  Income Inequity Moderators: Admin
Users Browsing Forum
Googlebot and 214 Guests

Income Inequity  This thread currently has 1,555 views. |
3 Pages 1 2 3 » Recommend Thread
Box A Rox
September 13, 2013, 10:26am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes
Nobel Memorial Prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz

‘The only true and sustainable prosperity is shared prosperity’

“It’s been clear to me that our economy has been sick for a long time,” he began, introducing
a theme he would hammer home throughout the speech. “For too long, the hardworking and
rule-abiding had seen their paychecks shrink or stay the same, while the rule-breakers raked
in huge profits and wealth,” he said. “It made our economy sick, and our politics sick, too.”

He attacked those who oppose living wages in the name of the abstraction of “cutting spending,”
saying that “[w]e won’t achieve [true and sustainable prosperity] through mindless cutbacks
in public spending, whether in schools, hospitals, police, or firemen. These are ways to keep
our economy sick. And an economy in which 95% of the growth goes to the top 1% can only
be called that: sick.”

Stiglitz then called on the members of the AFL-CIO to encourage others to unionize, citing Pres.
Lincoln on the consequences of dividing houses: “We have become a house divided against
itself – divided between the 99% and the 1%, between the workers, and those who would
exploit them. We have to reunite the house, but it won’t happen on its own.”

“It will only happen if workers come together. If they organize. If they unite to fight for what
they know is right, in each and every workplace, in each and every community, and in each
and every state capital and in Washington. We have to restore not only democracy to
Washington, but to the workplace.”


The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Logged Offline
Private Message
CICERO
September 13, 2013, 1:25pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
18,232
Reputation
68.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -8
Time Online
702 days 15 hours 7 minutes
Yes, because we can always trust the union and government leaders to not squander pension funds and social security.  Unions and government officials are not greedy.  Systematic management means systematic theft.  Unionized workers like to be collectively robbed.  Makes them feel better.


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 1 - 31
Box A Rox
September 13, 2013, 3:35pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes
Quoted from CICERO
Yes, because we can always trust the union and government leaders to not squander pension funds and social security.  Unions and government officials are not greedy.  Systematic management means systematic theft.  Unionized workers like to be collectively robbed.  Makes them feel better.


Cissy would much rather that the 1% keep on getting richer and the bottom 99% fend for
themselves.

Anti govt, anti union, anti health care, anti education, anti social... the only thing he's for is
himself.


The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 2 - 31
CICERO
September 13, 2013, 4:46pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
18,232
Reputation
68.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -8
Time Online
702 days 15 hours 7 minutes
Quoted from Box A Rox


Cissy would much rather that the 1% keep on getting richer and the bottom 99% fend for
themselves.

Anti govt, anti union, anti health care, anti education, anti social... the only thing he's for is
himself.


Pro freedom, pro individualism, pro free markets, anti collectivism.

The 1% get richer by using the powers of government to preserve their wealth.  Your solution is to use the power of government to preserve your wealth.  BOTH want to use coercive powers of government for their personal greed.  Gaming the markets to give labor an advantage over management or visa versa isn't freedom.  Let both of those in the 1% and 99% fail if they can't compete.

You believe in a managed class system, I don't.


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 3 - 31
Box A Rox
September 13, 2013, 5:11pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes
Quoted from CICERO

Pro freedom, pro individualism, pro free markets, anti collectivism.
The 1% get richer by using the powers of government to preserve their wealth.  Your solution is to use the power of government to preserve your wealth.  BOTH want to use coercive powers of government for their personal greed.  Gaming the markets to give labor an advantage over management or visa versa isn't freedom.  Let both of those in the 1% and 99% fail if they can't compete.
You believe in a managed class system, I don't.


Again, Cicero is a "ME".  He is alone in the world.
I consider myself a "WE".  "WE" working together can accomplish much more for all of us, than
Cicero will ever gain by himself.


The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 4 - 31
joebxr
September 13, 2013, 5:13pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
6,667
Reputation
70.00%
Reputation Score
+14 / -6
Time Online
276 days 6 hours 18 minutes
Quoted from CICERO

Pro freedom...............as long as it doesn't cost me anything and I can take advantage of it
pro individualism........as long as it coincides with how I think things should be
pro free markets........as long as I can take full advantage and it costs me nothing
anti collectivism.........this is a big DUH!!!!




JUST BECAUSE SISSY SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO...BUT HE THINKS IT DOES!!!!!  
JUST BECAUSE MC1 SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO!!!!!  
Logged
Private Message Reply: 5 - 31
Henry
September 13, 2013, 5:49pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
6,058
Reputation
85.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -3
Time Online
2114 days 9 hours 31 minutes
Quoted from Box A Rox


Again, Cicero is a "ME".  He is alone in the world.
I consider myself a "WE".  "WE" working together can accomplish much more for all of us, than
Cicero will ever gain by himself.


But at what cost and by what force, your type needs to be forced by penalties even if one doesn't agree with it or doesn't use the service.


"In the beginning of a change, the Patriot is a scarce man, brave, hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, however, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a Patriot."

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 6 - 31
CICERO
September 13, 2013, 6:02pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
18,232
Reputation
68.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -8
Time Online
702 days 15 hours 7 minutes
Quoted from Box A Rox


Again, Cicero is a "ME".  He is alone in the world.
I consider myself a "WE".  "WE" working together can accomplish much more for all of us, than
Cicero will ever gain by himself.


There is a voluntary "we".  I voluntarily work together everyday.  "We" can all work together without the coercive power of a few bureaucrats elected by a simple majority to force the minority of "we" to comply with the majorities demands.

Again, box is a "we" so long he is in the majority dictating to the minority.  We ALL have seen box go ape sh!t when he considered his president GWB a war criminal and illegitimate when he won the 2000 election.  He made it crystal clear that he despises his fellow "we" when they wield the levers of government.


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 7 - 31
senders
September 13, 2013, 7:02pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
29,348
Reputation
70.97%
Reputation Score
+22 / -9
Time Online
1574 days 2 hours 22 minutes
Quoted from CICERO
Yes, because we can always trust the union and government leaders to not squander pension funds and social security.  Unions and government officials are not greedy.  Systematic management means systematic theft.  Unionized workers like to be collectively robbed.  Makes them feel better.


ya can't trust any of them.....

remove the man from his own land to work the land of another man/society and that man is shackled for life

unions are a fu(king whitewash and a fulcrum for the politicians/votes......


...you are a product of your environment, your environment is a product of your priorities, your priorities are a product of you......

The replacement of morality and conscience with law produces a deadly paradox.


STOP BEING GOOD DEMOCRATS---STOP BEING GOOD REPUBLICANS--START BEING GOOD AMERICANS

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 8 - 31
GrahamBonnet
September 14, 2013, 8:49am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
9,643
Reputation
66.67%
Reputation Score
+16 / -8
Time Online
131 days 7 hours 47 minutes
Keep focusing in that 1% because we all know there is a limited pool of wealth...But really: that way the rest of the losers will turn their rage on the successful and away from the political class that put them in hock for future generations as far as can be seen.


Keep chanting: 1% 1% 1%

It will make it all better, really.


"While Foreign Terrorists were plotting to murder and maim using homemade bombs in Boston, Democrap officials in Washington DC, Albany and here were busy watching ME and other law abiding American Citizens who are gun owners and taxpayers, in an effort to blame the nation's lack of security on US so that they could have a political scapegoat."
Logged
Private Message Reply: 9 - 31
Box A Rox
September 14, 2013, 5:37pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes
Quoted from CICERO


There is a voluntary "we".  I voluntarily work together everyday.  "We" can all work together without the coercive power of a few bureaucrats elected by a simple majority to force the minority of "we" to comply with the majorities demands.

Again, box is a "we" so long he is in the majority dictating to the minority.  We ALL have seen box go ape sh!t when he considered his president GWB a war criminal and illegitimate when he won the 2000 election.  He made it crystal clear that he despises his fellow "we" when they wield the levers of government.


Just for clarity...
The results of voting in the 2000 Presidential Election:
G Worst Bush      50,456,002     47.87%
Al Gore               50,999,897     48.38%
The Winner........      543,895
Al Gore over half a million more votes than G Worst Bush!

or
Cicero's "majority" voted for Al Gore!


The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 10 - 31
A Better Rotterdam
September 14, 2013, 6:10pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
903
Reputation
60.00%
Reputation Score
+6 / -4
Time Online
38 days 7 hours 17 minutes
Just a reminder the Democrats have consistently supported the Electoral college to keep third parties out, thus have no right to whine when their own creation occasionally bites them in the a**.
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 11 - 31
Box A Rox
September 14, 2013, 6:20pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes
Quoted from A Better Rotterdam
Just a reminder the Democrats have consistently supported the Electoral college to keep third parties out, thus have no right to whine when their own creation occasionally bites them in the a**.


My post is in response to Cicero's whine:  "majority dictating to the minority".


The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 12 - 31
A Better Rotterdam
September 14, 2013, 6:23pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
903
Reputation
60.00%
Reputation Score
+6 / -4
Time Online
38 days 7 hours 17 minutes
Box, the Dem and Reps have been working together for years, can you think of any other logical explanation for the electoral college?
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 13 - 31
CICERO
September 14, 2013, 7:03pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
18,232
Reputation
68.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -8
Time Online
702 days 15 hours 7 minutes
Quoted from Box A Rox


Just for clarity...
The results of voting in the 2000 Presidential Election:
G Worst Bush      50,456,002     47.87%
Al Gore               50,999,897     48.38%
The Winner........      543,895
Al Gore over half a million more votes than G Worst Bush!

or
Cicero's "majority" voted for Al Gore!


Oh, sorry, my bad...So you supported Bush policy after he won the 2004 election?  Thanks for clarifying that for me.


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 14 - 31
3 Pages 1 2 3 » Recommend Thread
|


Thread Rating
There is currently no rating for this thread