Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
New Leases?
Rotterdam NY...the people's voice    Rotterdam's Virtual Internet Community    Outside Rotterdam  ›  New Leases? Moderators: Admin
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 239 Guests

New Leases?  This thread currently has 787 views. |
1 Pages 1 Recommend Thread
Madam X
August 25, 2013, 11:09am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
3,190
Reputation
66.67%
Reputation Score
+8 / -4
Time Online
26 days 9 hours 21 minutes
http://infoweb.newsbank.com/iw.....-25&f_publisher=

I don't know if that link is going to work or not. I don't own any rental property in the city, and I sympathize with anyone trying to make an honest living doing that, but just from a quick reading, this sounds like somebody trying to make it easier to be a slumlord in the city. We don't need that. We do need the same Housing Court they have down in the city, why is Schenectady always shortchanged?

A landlord doesn't have a unit ready for you to move into, and you CAN'T void the deal? Why would someone even want to put that in a lease? Does that sound to any legitimate property owners like something you would do? The laws work against the landlord in some cases, but what makes anyone think they can rewrite the laws they don't care for? Not a good development, IMO, and an example of the failure ofgovernment at its legitimate purpose, to help people live together. Our "leaders" are busy building new housing and have abandoned their responsibilities for what we already have.
Logged Offline
Private Message
rpforpres
August 25, 2013, 12:26pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
3,891
Reputation
89.47%
Reputation Score
+17 / -2
Time Online
113 days 4 hours 29 minutes
A new lease that bans barbecuing, forces tenants to pay for pest removal and asks invasive questions may become the new standard lease in Schenectady.
The group Schenectady Landlords Infl uencing Change has been working on a standard lease, which all of its members could use. The initial goal was to get members to use a lease at all, but it grew into a six-page document designed to protect landlords and minimize their costs.
SLIC organizer Chris Morris said the lease was stricter than most landlords would consider necessary — and that was a good thing.
“You can always back off on them if individual things come up,” she said. “Once they do something, it’s really difficult to turn it around.”
Some landlords spend months going through eviction court hearings over issues that could have been avoided by banning certain activity from the start. Morris has argued that clear rules are the bedrock of a good tenant-landlord relationship. RENTERS’ GROUP SURPRISED
But the leader of Schenectady’s new tenant group, Deb Rembert, was stunned by some of the stricter provisions.
If a landlord promises that a unit will be ready by a certain date, and it is not, the tenant can’t break the lease, according to the terms set out in the document. They can only walk away if the unit still isn’t ready 30 days later.
“The landlord already broke the lease,” Rembert said in disbelief. “They can’t do that. If that tenant says, ‘OK, I’m going to look somewhere else,’ they should be able to do that.”
Landlord Mitch Goldstein, who was instrumental in writing the lease, said landlords should be protected from losing a tenant because of an emergency.
A fair solution would be to send a tenant to a motel and split the bill, he said.
“He knows he’s going to be liable for damages,” Goldstein added. “It doesn’t need to say that in the lease.”
But 30 days is a long time to wait. Rembert said the landlord should instead return the tenant’s security deposit and first month’s rent so that the tenant could find another apartment. ‘DISCOUNT’ PROVISION
The proposed lease also hides the true cost of the apartment.
At a recent meeting about the lease, SLIC attorney Sarah Green encouraged landlords to write down a rent that was several hundred dollars higher than it actually is, while offering tenants a “discount” to the actual rent if they pay before the fifth of the month. Landlords would advertise the unit at the discounted price.
The higher amount could be used by the landlord to maximize the amount of money they could get from the tenant if they have to evict, Green said.
Judges don’t like large late-payment fees, but they will approve the payment of the non-discounted rent, she explained.
Such legal maneuverings made Rembert decide that tenants need an attorney.
“I think that’s dishonest,” she said. “We need a lawyer. Now they have a lawyer, and we need one to counteract some of what the landlord group does.”
Morris called the rent discount a “tactic” and said she eliminated it from her leases long ago.
“I took that out. I wanted to be able to state the rent,” she said. PEST POLICY AT ISSUE
The lease also forces tenants to take on a responsibility that the state requires of landlords. If pests invade after the first week, the tenant must pay for pest-removal services, even though state law says pest control is the landlord’s responsibility.
Schenectady Homeownership Coordinator Ahmad Yusufi said tenants should cross out that section when signing the lease and get help from an attorney.
But Rembert said she doubted landlords would let her change a lease.
“I’m pretty sure if tenants don’t sign this, landlords will say, ‘You can’t habitate in our premises,’ ” she said.
If they do sign, they might have to go to court to find out who has to pay for pest control.
City Deputy Corporation Counsel Carl Falotico said the landlord might still have to pay. In general, he said, a lease can’t supersede state law. He wasn’t sure how a judge would rule on the matter, though.
Logistically, the provision could also be complicated. Many pestcontrol services only offer yearlong contracts, creating problems in cases where the tenant’s lease expires before their contract. In those cases, tenants could wind up paying for pest control months after moving out.
Rembert said most tenants would not be able to afford a service anyway.
“That means they will be living with pests for the duration of their time in that apartment,” she said.
But Morris argued vehemently in favor of the provision, saying tenants cause most infestations.
“One would assume, if something of that nature is there, it’s because of something they’re doing,” she said. NO BARBECUE, BABYSITTING
The lease also prohibits some common activities, including barbecuing. The lease forbids tenants from storing a barbecue grill, even though many units have backyards large enough to operate a grill safely.
That prohibition doesn’t violate state law, Yusufi said.
“But personally, I don’t think tenants should be prevented,” he said. “The landlord should not take the tenant’s rights away to enjoy the property he is paying for.”
Goldstein said that although he will use the standard lease with his tenants, he would never stop a tenant from barbecuing.
“If somebody says, ‘I want a barbecue,’ you just cross it out,” he said. “If someone wants to barbecue, I’m not going to have any objection, zero. But some landlords, they have had experiences where the barbecue has been an issue.”
The lease also requires tenants to pay for carpet cleaning once a year and bans all business activity — including babysitting. That would keep small business activity from “getting out of control,” Morris said.
But Rembert said many tenants have side businesses — selling crafts on Etsy or occasional babysitting — and shouldn’t be prohibited.
“I don’t think the landlord should have that kind of power,” she said, “as long as it’s not damaging the property. However, the landlord should make it clear, if your business gets out of hand, I’m going to have to ask you to refrain. Let the tenant and the landlord agree on that, and then the tenant can sign something to that effect.” CREDIT CARD NUMBERS
With the lease comes a standard application SLIC has also proposed for all of its members. The application asks renters to list a credit card number, the expiration date of the card, the name on the card and the security number on the back.
Goldstein said he asks for the credit card information so he can recoup unpaid rent or payment for damages after a tenant leaves.
“It’s a self-protection measure. Often someone will leave and monies will be owed,” he said. “If you have a credit card number, you have a chance to make yourself whole.”
But an unauthorized credit card charge sounds a lot like stealing, Rembert said.
“To jack the tenant up, that’s wrong,” she said, adding that the landlord should use the security deposit to cover damages or unpaid rent.
Landlords would also take a huge risk by keeping credit card information, Yusufi said. If someone broke into their files and used the cards, the landlord would be responsible.
“The tenant can suffer identify theft,” he said, adding that tenants could sue the landlord for damages. TENANTS’ PAST LAWSUITS
The application also asks renters if they have ever been sued or sued a person or corporation. Those questions are listed in the same box with questions about bankruptcy and felony convictions. The intent was to find out whether tenants regularly sued landlords, Goldstein said.
“That would be important to know about,” he said.
But Rembert worried a tenant might be rejected for an apartment because of a long-ago lawsuit.
“It can become a prejudice against us. They will then decide they won’t have you on their property,” she said.
Overall, she said, she was dismayed by the proposed standard lease and application.
“The landlords are having way too much power,” she said. “Now that they have an attorney, that’s going to be a step up for them and a step down for the tenants.”
She wants to raise funds for a tenants’ group attorney, with hope the two groups’ attorneys could meet and hammer out the “best lease” for both sides.
“We should collaborate,” she said. “Some of the landlords are just what we say: slumlords. And that will give them too much power.” ‘A STARTING POINT’
Goldstein argued the lease is just a starting point.
“It is a strong lease,” he said, explaining that “you just throw in everything, including the kitchen sink, even if it sounds silly.”
Then landlords can make accommodations with each individual tenant. They don’t just enforce the letter of the law, he said.
“There is also the spirit. Landlords are people, and they are dealing with people,” he said.
The landlord group, SLIC, will next meet on Sept. 3 at 6:30 p.m. in the Price Chopper Community Room.
The tenant group, STAMP, will next meet Sept. 19 at 6:30 p.m. in the McChesney Room at the main branch of the Schenectady County Public Library.
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 1 - 4
Ididntdoit
August 26, 2013, 8:30am Report to Moderator
Full Member
Posts
236
Reputation
60.00%
Reputation Score
+3 / -2
Time Online
19 days 8 hours 49 minutes
Rembert has some points but I have to say that I don't think she is a good representative. Too much whining, there's a better way to negotiate than doing that.

Re:childcare-landlords have to worry about liability. An insurance company I worked for would not issue a policy if there was a
daycareon the premises. Occasional babysitting she says? If it is occasional, how does that get out of hand? if there are too
many kids frequently on the premises, it's a daycare not occasional babysitting.

As a former prop manager, I had a very specific lease. Some people just need to be told not to leave the lights on 24/7 (if LL
paid utils for instance) etc. Some need to be told how to live cooperatively, you have to lay out the rules.

Just don't rent the premises if you don't like the lease. BTW I'm a renter.
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 2 - 4
TakingItBack
August 27, 2013, 11:44am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
1,579
Reputation
80.00%
Reputation Score
+8 / -2
Time Online
71 days 7 hours 28 minutes
All this talk about leases is a waste of time.  NY State Law dictates what can and cant be in the lease.  Even then it doesnt matter if it fits the law to a T or even if it is the NY State model lease, it will depend upon how Guido Loyola decides the case and we all know he is almost always pro tenant.  


Life is tough, but it's tougher when you're stupid - John Wayne


TIP TO NEW VISITORS TO THIS FORUM - To improve your blogging pleasure it is recommended to ignore (Through editing your prefere) the posts of the following bloggers - DemocraticVoiceofReason, Scotsgod08 and Smoking Bananas.  They continually go off topic, do not provide facts and make irrational remarks. If you do not believe me, this can be proven by their reputation scores or by a sampling of their posts.  
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 3 - 4
mikechristine1
August 29, 2013, 5:17pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
9,074
Reputation
71.88%
Reputation Score
+23 / -9
Time Online
99 days 18 hours 36 minutes
Did you see that one speaking at this weeks meeting, she wants their group to have an attorney.   Bet she thinks it's an entitlement at taxpayer expense.

Leases are between tenants and landlords.  If a group of landlords want to get together to address city ordinances that may affect them, and then such a group talks to news media about suggested leases for landlords, oh well, it is NOT the city's business and that DeBOREah should NOT be whining at a council meeting because the city does not have any responsibility or authority, nor should they, over leases between private people.




Optimists close their eyes and pretend problems are non existent.  
Better to have open eyes, see the truths, acknowledge the negatives, and
speak up for the people rather than the politicos and their rich cronies.
Logged
Private Message Reply: 4 - 4
1 Pages 1 Recommend Thread
|


Thread Rating
There is currently no rating for this thread