Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
The Frackin' Water
Rotterdam NY...the people's voice    Rotterdam's Virtual Internet Community    New York State  ›   The Frackin' Water Moderators: Admin
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 36 Guests

The Frackin' Water  This thread currently has 11,994 views. |
10 Pages « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 » Recommend Thread
DemocraticVoiceOfReason
June 26, 2013, 10:56am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
12,321
Reputation
20.83%
Reputation Score
+10 / -38
Time Online
151 days 7 hours 5 minutes
Quoted from Tommy


I don't supposed it has anything the roughly 11,000 abandoned coal mines there does it?

Many of them were created using similar methods.

There is a town named "Centralia" that is now completely uninhabitable because the coal mine that lies beneath it, has been on fire since 1962.

METHANE IN WATER IS NOT SOMETHING THAT NATURALLY OCCURS IN NATURE!!!

You're being sold a bad bill of goods, and will most certainly be on the wrong side of history.


There are natural deposits of methane under the oceans and also under the continents.  And the methane under the the oceans does get released into the ocean water NATURALLY.  

So apparently you are on the WRONG SIDE of BOTH history and science.


George Amedore & Christian Klueg for NYS Senate 2016
Pete Vroman for State Assembly 2016[/size][/color]

"For this is what America is all about. It is the uncrossed desert and the unclimbed ridge. It is the star that is not reached and the harvest that is sleeping in the unplowed ground."
Lyndon Baines Johnson
Logged
Private Message Reply: 15 - 142
Madam X
June 26, 2013, 11:36am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
3,190
Reputation
66.67%
Reputation Score
+8 / -4
Time Online
26 days 9 hours 21 minutes
I understood Tommy's post.
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 16 - 142
DemocraticVoiceOfReason
June 26, 2013, 12:07pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
12,321
Reputation
20.83%
Reputation Score
+10 / -38
Time Online
151 days 7 hours 5 minutes
Quoted from Madam X
I understood Tommy's post.


Whether you understood his post or not -- Tommy's comments were wrong -- the FACT is that methane deposits occur naturally and methane can get into water and water supplies naturally.



George Amedore & Christian Klueg for NYS Senate 2016
Pete Vroman for State Assembly 2016[/size][/color]

"For this is what America is all about. It is the uncrossed desert and the unclimbed ridge. It is the star that is not reached and the harvest that is sleeping in the unplowed ground."
Lyndon Baines Johnson
Logged
Private Message Reply: 17 - 142
Madam X
June 26, 2013, 12:26pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
3,190
Reputation
66.67%
Reputation Score
+8 / -4
Time Online
26 days 9 hours 21 minutes
I understood Tommy's post.
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 18 - 142
Tommy
June 26, 2013, 12:51pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
1,660
Reputation
56.25%
Reputation Score
+9 / -7
Time Online
62 days 22 hours 29 minutes


There are natural deposits of methane under the oceans and also under the continents.  And the methane under the the oceans does get released into the ocean water NATURALLY.  

So apparently you are on the WRONG SIDE of BOTH history and science.


What is not natural, is the AMOUNT of methane being released.
Methane is a natural byproduct of cellular decomposition, and exists almost everywhere, but not in those concentrations.


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 19 - 142
Madam X
June 26, 2013, 12:59pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
3,190
Reputation
66.67%
Reputation Score
+8 / -4
Time Online
26 days 9 hours 21 minutes
The mines, "created using similar methods" - that's the key, we are talking about a different type of methane being found in wells, one that should not be present and would not normally occur.

Who has ocean water in their well, btw?
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 20 - 142
Box A Rox
June 26, 2013, 1:24pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes
The water went from .01 MG/L to 64MG/L after Fracking.


The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 21 - 142
Box A Rox
June 26, 2013, 1:38pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes
Fracked home water wells now contain Manganese, Arsenic, Barium, Sodium, Phenol,
Glycol & DEHP... all common products in Fracking Fluids.

What used to be clean clear drinking water, now comes out of the tap looking like coffee
with cream.


CBS News:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-tZ--fR6ywc


The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 22 - 142
Madam X
June 26, 2013, 2:02pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
3,190
Reputation
66.67%
Reputation Score
+8 / -4
Time Online
26 days 9 hours 21 minutes
Anyone remember when there was so much manganese in Schenectady water it would come out of the faucet black, at times? We were told then that itwas safe to drink, later on we found out it wasn't.

That "methane is everywhere" talking point is propaganda. I know an eensy bit about methane and well contamination, that's why I'm careful to state that I'm no kind of expert on the topic. That doesn't stop some from picking up propaganda and passing it off as critical thinking. I don't know why people want to do this, but there is no point in calling them out on it because they don't know the difference between thinking for yourself and parroting something thrown out there by those with an agenda.
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 23 - 142
Box A Rox
June 26, 2013, 2:21pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes
In the end, fracking, once perfected, may be a viable way to extract Natural Gas in the USA.  
There are many issues still unresolved with the process... the disposal of million gallons of toxic
water laced with an "unknown" mix of chemicals.  (The chemical mix used is a proprietary secret).
Poisoned water wells...  Poisoned streams.. toxic chemical spills etc.

Another issue is gas moving to the surface, then to the atmosphere due to Fracking.  If you believe
in Climate Change or not, we can all agree that methane in the atmosphere just increases the
problem.

Snake Creek Marina  Franklin Forks, Susquehanna County, Pa.
Snake Creek Bubbling with Methane !
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EbIjm4Ee6-I



The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 24 - 142
AVON
June 26, 2013, 2:30pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
785
Reputation
83.33%
Reputation Score
+10 / -2
Time Online
109 days 14 hours 28 minutes
         The fracking dilemma is divided by those that stand to be directly impacted and those that understand these impacts, vs. those who want the resource to enrich their lives with no regard for others.  These folks who remain ignorant on the topic and immune to the impacts are the ones that cry out the left wing nut jobs are killing the State and/or Country.  Government has no statutory authority to diminish the health and welfare of its constituents without a thorough investigation as to the impacts.  There are serious legal implications for proceeding haphazardly.  Because NYS does a better job than other states in investigating these impacts is not a platform for criticism, it should be heralded.  Opinions are like A## Holes, everyone has one.  It's the self serving, uneducated ones that are the scariest.
Logged
Private Message Reply: 25 - 142
Box A Rox
June 26, 2013, 2:41pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes
Once Fracking technology was perfected enough to extract gas... there was no incentive to improve the process.

There is no doubt that the Shale Gas is a huge resource, but just like the BP oil well in the Gulf, if it isn't done
safely everyone pays the price.

I'm all for extracting the resource, but in a manner that is safe to the residents in the area and to the
environment.  
Just because it's POSSIBLE to be done, doesn't mean that it should be done disregarding the environmental
cost.


The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 26 - 142
55tbird
June 26, 2013, 2:46pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
3,211
Reputation
91.67%
Reputation Score
+11 / -1
Time Online
209 days 13 hours 13 minutes
Fracking has huge potential, but I've heard enough that for now, it should be limited to the vast wastelands of the Dakotas...etc, far, far away from water supplies...
If the Gas/oil companies can prove though operations in those areas that fracking is safe, then fine. If not, then forget it... IMHO, the onus is on them.


"Arguing with liberals is like playing chess with a pigeon; no matter how good I am at chess, the pigeon is just going to knock out the pieces, crap on the board, and strut around like it is victorious." - Author Unknown
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 27 - 142
DemocraticVoiceOfReason
June 26, 2013, 3:03pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
12,321
Reputation
20.83%
Reputation Score
+10 / -38
Time Online
151 days 7 hours 5 minutes
There are farmers and landowners in the Southern Tier who are barely scraping by economically who would benefit financially from the approval of fracking.  They live on the land where the activity would happen, and thus have a substantial vested interest in the area remaining liveable.  So the suggestion by the one of the posters that the only people who want fracking are rich people who don't care what happens to the area is absolutely false.

The industry is constantly working to improve its technology.  It hasn't stopped working to improve the technology like one of the posters has suggested.

And, it is just plain ludicrous to NOT tap into a resource that is literally right under our feet.  The Dakotas are NOT a wasteland like some idiot has stated.   NEW YORK IS BECOMING A WASTELAND because of the lack of intelligent, competent and sensible leadership.


George Amedore & Christian Klueg for NYS Senate 2016
Pete Vroman for State Assembly 2016[/size][/color]

"For this is what America is all about. It is the uncrossed desert and the unclimbed ridge. It is the star that is not reached and the harvest that is sleeping in the unplowed ground."
Lyndon Baines Johnson
Logged
Private Message Reply: 28 - 142
Box A Rox
June 26, 2013, 3:52pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes
There are farmers and landowners in the Southern Tier who are barely scraping by economically who would benefit financially from the approval of fracking.  They live on the land where the activity would happen, and thus have a substantial vested interest in the area remaining liveable.  


We ALL live on the land where where cracking would happen!

The actual gas well may be a half mile away but MY WATER would be undrinkable!
One farmer gains... ALL New Yorkers lose when streams and lakes are poisoned!



The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 29 - 142
10 Pages « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 » Recommend Thread
|


Thread Rating
There is currently no rating for this thread