But it says they were refused the items. That implies they asked for them, either in person or by phone.
It also implies that they refused to give up the articles after police entered with a warrant ....or.... Police could have entered the store without a warrant on a tip that the stolen goods were there, and that is totally legal....no warrant needed for that! They could have stated they were looking for stolen goods, and that is legal....no warrant needed for that. They could have seen the articles in question in the display case and stated to the owners that they were stolen and asked for them, and that is totally legal....no warrant needed for that. The articles, if in the display case, were in public view...no warrant needed to identify them and tell the owners they were stolen and ask for them to be surrendered....still no warrant needed. Once they refused (if this is actually the scenario), then they sent for a warrant so they could seize the items....now a warrant is needed. Damn policewith their storm trooper tactics, searching stores without search warrants again! Bunch of illegal ba$tards stepping all over civil liberties!!!!!!! |