Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
Thank You President Obama!
Rotterdam NY...the people's voice    Rotterdam's Virtual Internet Community     Chit Chat About Anything  ›  Thank You President Obama! Moderators: Admin
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 64 Guests

Thank You President Obama!  This thread currently has 127,567 views. |
135 Pages « ... 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 ... » Recommend Thread
Box A Rox
December 6, 2013, 9:28am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes
Quoted from BuckStrider
This is what happens when you start giving little kids candy whenever they want....
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/dec/5/activists-encourage-obama-to-circumvent-congress-u/


LMAO @ "ACTIVISTS".
You have Conservative TeaBagger "ACTIVISTS" advocating the 'impeachment' of the President...
and????


The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 1020 - 2021
Box A Rox
December 6, 2013, 9:30am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes
Quoted from CICERO


OHHH...You don't like the Obama trickle up economy, where the government take money from the 99% and gives it to the 1%...As we've witnessed over the past 5 years, where banks and insurance companies were handed trillions of dollars, while the 99% saw an increase of food stamps and permanent disability.  This is a much healthier economy.


As posted above:
He ASSUMED that I meant one thing, then went with it.

He's now on his way to an all day pissin contest!


Cissy is out back building a Straw Man... he's tryin... it keeps fallin apart, but he's not givin up!
GO Cissy GO!!!


The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 1021 - 2021
BuckStrider
December 6, 2013, 9:32am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
3,188
Reputation
76.47%
Reputation Score
+13 / -4
Time Online
71 days 23 hours 59 minutes
Quoted from Box A Rox


You're kiddin right???  

OK, just in case you're not 'kidding'...



But I just assumed that you knew that!  


Bullshit Boxy.....He's unilaterally changing whole catagories law that have been in place for years.

Take your beloved ACA and I'll ask the same question again....What gives the POTUS the right to delay the business mandate of the ACA? Are you trying to say that the POTUS has the discretion to ignore entire categories of law?  





"Approval ratings go up and down for various reasons... An example is the high post 911 support for
GWB even though he could be said to be responsible for the event." --- Box A Rox '9/11 Truther'

Melania is a bimbo... she is there to look at, not to listen to. --- Box A Rox and his 'War on Women'

Logged
Private Message Reply: 1022 - 2021
BuckStrider
December 6, 2013, 9:33am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
3,188
Reputation
76.47%
Reputation Score
+13 / -4
Time Online
71 days 23 hours 59 minutes
Quoted from CICERO


OHHH...You don't like the Obama trickle up economy poverty, where the government take money from the 99% and gives it to the 1%...As we've witnessed over the past 5 years, where banks and insurance companies were handed trillions of dollars, while the 99% saw an increase of food stamps and permanent disability.  This is a much healthier economy.


Fixed





"Approval ratings go up and down for various reasons... An example is the high post 911 support for
GWB even though he could be said to be responsible for the event." --- Box A Rox '9/11 Truther'

Melania is a bimbo... she is there to look at, not to listen to. --- Box A Rox and his 'War on Women'

Logged
Private Message Reply: 1023 - 2021
CICERO
December 6, 2013, 9:34am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
18,232
Reputation
68.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -8
Time Online
702 days 15 hours 7 minutes
Quoted from Box A Rox



For those who missed it... the US President is empowered to implement laws passed by congress:


For those that missed it, implement means:
-carry out or fulfill something: to put something into effect or action

Obama isn't implementing his own signature law.  He is unilaterally NULLIFYING the implementation of the ACA 2014 mandate.  The President doesn't have the power to nullify laws.  He is creating a lawless society.  Which you are correct box, is a good thing.  If he doesn't have to follow the law, why does everybody else?


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 1024 - 2021
Box A Rox
December 6, 2013, 9:40am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes
Quoted from BuckStrider


Bullshit Boxy.....He's unilaterally changing whole catagories law that have been in place for years.

Take your beloved ACA and I'll ask the same question again....What gives the POTUS the right to delay the business mandate of the ACA? Are you trying to say that the POTUS has the discretion to ignore entire categories of law?  



I'll post it once again if you really need it.  

The president is responsible for IMPLEMENTING laws passed by congress.

Dictionary.com:
Implement:
~ to fulfill; perform; carry out
~ to put into effect according to or by means of a definite plan or procedure.

Any president is charged with "implementing" laws passed by congress.  There is discretion as
to how that is carried out.  
An example:
When the ObamaCare website was faulty and not able to carry out it's function... Obama has the
authority to delay or postpone parts of the law.
  
(It's really not that complicated and certainly nothing new)


The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 1025 - 2021
CICERO
December 6, 2013, 9:42am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
18,232
Reputation
68.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -8
Time Online
702 days 15 hours 7 minutes
Quoted from Box A Rox


An example:
When the ObamaCare website was faulty and not able to carry out it's function... Obama has the
authority to delay or postpone parts of the law.
  
(It's really not that complicated and certainly nothing new)


No, he cannot unilaterally delay the implementation of a law.  He can go back to congress and ask to amend the law to delay the implementation of it.


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 1026 - 2021
CICERO
December 6, 2013, 9:45am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
18,232
Reputation
68.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -8
Time Online
702 days 15 hours 7 minutes
From the plain reading of the Constitution that the president’s fundamental duty is to “take Care that the laws be faithfully executed” (Article II, Section 3); to the U.S. Supreme Court’s unequivocal judgment in Kendall v. United States (1838 ) that the president may not claim a power to “control the legislation of Congress”; to the court’s resounding rejection of a mere statutory line-item veto in Clinton v. City of New York (1998 ) — there is no uncertainty about the president’s duty to either enforce a law entirely or to ask the duly authorized Congress to amend it. He does not have the power of amendment himself."


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 1027 - 2021
Box A Rox
December 6, 2013, 9:53am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes
Quoted from CICERO
From the plain reading of the Constitution that the president’s fundamental duty is to “take Care that the laws be faithfully executed” (Article II, Section 3); to the U.S. Supreme Court’s unequivocal judgment in Kendall v. United States (1838 ) that the president may not claim a power to “control the legislation of Congress”; to the court’s resounding rejection of a mere statutory line-item veto in Clinton v. City of New York (1998 ) — there is no uncertainty about the president’s duty to either enforce a law entirely or to ask the duly authorized Congress to amend it. He does not have the power of amendment himself."



          
     Stage 9: The Law is Implemented and Enforced     
          
Quoted Text
Regulatory Activity
The legislative process does not stop once a bill becomes law. Many laws must be put
into effect, or implemented, by an agency of the executive branch.
Through a delegation of his authority, the President makes an agency responsible
for implementing the law.
The agency then can issue administrative regulations
explaining how it intends to put the law into effect and/or what a citizen must do to
comply with the law.
Not surprisingly, the political agenda of the Administration influences this process,
particularly when Congress is controlled by a different party than that of the executive
branch. The President, as head of the executive branch, is not required to implement
any law; one way to slow the process of implementation is not to promulgate regulations.
The regulatory process is fairly straightforward compared to the legislative process. It
is governed by one law, the "Administrative Procedure Act of 1946", and there is only
one official source in which all phases of the regulatory process are reported—the
daily Federal Register. There are many steps along the regulatory process.


The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 1028 - 2021
CICERO
December 6, 2013, 10:00am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
18,232
Reputation
68.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -8
Time Online
702 days 15 hours 7 minutes
Quoted Text
Regulatory Activity
The legislative process does not stop once a bill becomes law. Many laws must be put
into effect, or implemented, by an agency of the executive branch.
Through a delegation of his authority, the President makes an agency responsible
for implementing the law. The agency then can issue administrative regulations
explaining how it intends to put the law into effect and/or what a citizen must do to
comply with the law.


He's not implementing the law.  The 2014 ACA mandate requiring the minimum coverage is nullified.  Non implementation of the law isn't a form of implementation.  

I'm with  you though, this is great.  Maybe I'll join the political process to get a president elected that doesn't not have to implement congresses laws.  I wouldn't care if Congress was all socialist statists, as long as you can get one person elected that will ignore their laws and not enact them.


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 1029 - 2021
Box A Rox
December 6, 2013, 10:06am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes
Quoted from CICERO


He's not implementing the law.  The 2014 ACA mandate requiring the minimum coverage is nullified.  Non implementation of the law isn't a form of implementation.  

I'm with  you though, this is great.  Maybe I'll join the political process to get a president elected that doesn't not have to implement congresses laws.  I wouldn't care if Congress was all socialist statists, as long as you can get one person elected that will ignore their laws and not enact them.


Again Cissy... YOU DON'T BELIEVE IN LAWS!  OR GOVT... So how does this impact you???
If you actually voted for the president, you could be angry that he's not following the law the
way you think it should be followed... but you didn't vote for anyone!
If you voted for his opponent, you could be angry that he's not following US Law...
but again, you reject US law... so on this issue... YOU AND OBAMA ARE ON THE SAME PAGE!



The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 1030 - 2021
CICERO
December 6, 2013, 10:08am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
18,232
Reputation
68.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -8
Time Online
702 days 15 hours 7 minutes
Quoted from Box A Rox


Again Cissy... YOU DON'T BELIEVE IN LAWS!  OR GOVT... So how does this impact you???
If you actually voted for the president, you could be angry that he's not following the law the
way you think it should be followed... but you didn't vote for anyone!
If you voted for his opponent, you could be angry that he's not following US Law...
but again, you reject US law... so on this issue... YOU AND OBAMA ARE ON THE SAME PAGE!




Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 1031 - 2021
CICERO
December 6, 2013, 10:10am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
18,232
Reputation
68.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -8
Time Online
702 days 15 hours 7 minutes
Quoted from Box A Rox


Again Cissy... YOU DON'T BELIEVE IN LAWS!  OR GOVT... So how does this impact you???


Presidential decree is just as bad, maybe worse.  But equally illegitimate. But, if I can get someone elected that will nullify all laws, I may support you in your defense of lawlessness.


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 1032 - 2021
Box A Rox
December 6, 2013, 10:22am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes
It's fun to watch Cicero defend the "rule of law" that he doesn't believe in.  


The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 1033 - 2021
CICERO
December 6, 2013, 10:44am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
18,232
Reputation
68.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -8
Time Online
702 days 15 hours 7 minutes
Quoted from Box A Rox
It's fun to watch Cicero defend the "rule of law" that he doesn't believe in.  


It's funnier watching you try to defend Obama nullifying a law and trying to describe it as lawful.  You've mocked republicans that tried to LAWFULLY repeal the ACA and try to LAWFULLY delay the individual mandate.  Now you are supporting these same acts when done unlawfully by the president.  It shows you have amazing loyalty to your leader, and really could care less about government, laws, and order.  You are fine with lawlessness, as long as it is by somebody that you identify with ideologically.


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 1034 - 2021
135 Pages « ... 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 ... » Recommend Thread
|


Thread Rating
There is currently no rating for this thread