I don't care if your left, right or in the middle. This woman is the true definintion of a loving caring mother. What her and her daughter went through : (
Excellent video! I don't remember hearing about this thru the LAME STREAM MEDIA.....which shouldn't come as a big surprise!!!
When the INSANE are running the ASYLUM In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the rule. -- Friedrich Nietzsche
“How fortunate for those in power that people never think.” Adolph Hitler
I don't care if your left, right or in the middle. This woman is the true definintion of a loving caring mother. What her and her daughter went through : (
UG! Drama drama drama... Do you really want a NEWS video to be so full of DRAMA??? Why not just the FACTS? Why do they need the music? the theater? the hype? BECAUSE THEY AREN'T REPORTING AN EVENT, THEY ARE SHAPING YOUR VIEW OF THAT EVENT.
To answer the main question of the entire piece: AT THE HEART OF IT IS THE QUESTION, WHO DECIDES THE BEST MEDICAL CARE FOR THEIR CHILD? THE GOVT OR THE PARENTS? (of course neither the parent or the government is qualified to make some medical decisions... but a doctor is qualified.)
Just framing the question between "THE GOVT" OR "THE PARENT" is shaping your view. Some parents would deny their kids medicine that would save their lives... Should the parent decide that their kids should die? NOPE! The Govt? Often govt policy doesn't take in special considerations of the particular situation... so although most times govt policy would be prudent, it sometimes is not the best for the child.
If all you watch is DRAMA, and all you watch is HYPE... all you'll know is DRAMA and HYPE! This is just one more of the classic Paul "message".
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
Should the parent decide that their kids should die? NOPE!
Yeah that coming from you get real, at least this brave women won in the end.
"In the beginning of a change, the Patriot is a scarce man, brave, hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, however, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a Patriot."
The death of a teenager whose parents refused to get her treated for diabetes because of religious beliefs has been classified a homicide and the parents could be charged with murder.
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
To answer the main question of the entire piece: AT THE HEART OF IT IS THE QUESTION, WHO DECIDES THE BEST MEDICAL CARE FOR THEIR CHILD? THE GOVT OR THE PARENTS? (of course neither the parent or the government is qualified to make some medical decisions... but a doctor is qualified.)
Only a doctor is qualified to make medical decisions? That's absurd. The legal system and threats of malpractice lawsuits make decisions for a doctor. If the doctor decided not to give this child these anti psychotic drugs and this child harmed a person or herself, the lawyers would be going after the doctor that diagnosed the child and possibly hold them liable for not treating the child with a prescription drug. So it may be in the doctor’s best interest to prescribe the drug even though he doesn’t believe it is the best treatment, in order to reduce exposure to a lawsuit. If the child is harmed or harms a person while on these drugs, the doctor can mitigate some of the cost onto the pharmaceutical company that developed and manufactured the drug prescribed. Case law decides medical treatment.
Only a doctor is qualified to make medical decisions? That's absurd. The legal system and threats of malpractice lawsuits make decisions for a doctor. If the doctor decided not to give this child these anti psychotic drugs and this child harmed a person or herself, the lawyers would be going after the doctor that diagnosed the child and possibly hold them liable for not treating the child with a prescription drug. So it may be in the doctor’s best interest to prescribe the drug even though he doesn’t believe it is the best treatment, in order to reduce exposure to a lawsuit. If the child is harmed or harms a person while on these drugs, the doctor can mitigate some of the cost onto the pharmaceutical company that developed and manufactured the drug prescribed. Case law decides medical treatment.
BINGO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
...you are a product of your environment, your environment is a product of your priorities, your priorities are a product of you......
The replacement of morality and conscience with law produces a deadly paradox.
STOP BEING GOOD DEMOCRATS---STOP BEING GOOD REPUBLICANS--START BEING GOOD AMERICANS
Detroit can borrow money for this stuff. That is comforting. Long live GOVERNMENT! GOVERNMENT UBER ALLES!
"While Foreign Terrorists were plotting to murder and maim using homemade bombs in Boston, Democrap officials in Washington DC, Albany and here were busy watching ME and other law abiding American Citizens who are gun owners and taxpayers, in an effort to blame the nation's lack of security on US so that they could have a political scapegoat."
Logged
