Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
Erikson may not have party support
Rotterdam NY...the people's voice    Rotterdam's Virtual Internet Community    Outside Rotterdam  ›  Erikson may not have party support Moderators: Admin
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 184 Guests

Erikson may not have party support  This thread currently has 1,825 views. |
3 Pages « 1 2 3 » Recommend Thread
Patches
February 27, 2013, 10:44am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
4,839
Reputation
63.16%
Reputation Score
+12 / -7
Time Online
40 days 11 hours 18 minutes


Watch the council meetings....you can get a leg up....especially facial expressions from Brucker.....and the one that sits on the diaz like a dummy....


are we in America or not ????.....we ALL have a voice no matter to what party one belongs......dictatorship is not an  option.

////
Logged
Private Message Reply: 15 - 35
GrahamBonnet
February 27, 2013, 10:57am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
9,643
Reputation
66.67%
Reputation Score
+16 / -8
Time Online
131 days 7 hours 47 minutes
uhhh, actually it IS an option. The only one people seem to want right now, actually.


"While Foreign Terrorists were plotting to murder and maim using homemade bombs in Boston, Democrap officials in Washington DC, Albany and here were busy watching ME and other law abiding American Citizens who are gun owners and taxpayers, in an effort to blame the nation's lack of security on US so that they could have a political scapegoat."
Logged
Private Message Reply: 16 - 35
Patches
February 27, 2013, 11:19am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
4,839
Reputation
63.16%
Reputation Score
+12 / -7
Time Online
40 days 11 hours 18 minutes



how complacent and brain washed is this society...what good did education do......just book smart and nothing else.......there doesn;t seem to be that hope of a decent government.
Logged
Private Message Reply: 17 - 35
rachel72
February 27, 2013, 11:20am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
2,249
Reputation
82.35%
Reputation Score
+14 / -3
Time Online
68 days 1 hours 3 minutes
Quoted from GrahamBonnet
uhhh, actually it IS an option. The only one people seem to want right now, actually.


How many other towns/cities/villages you know where a Mayor fires people for going public with public information? Or where an independent voice gets one booted off the re-election ticket? Or where a lone-independent Council member is excluded from the budget discussions?


Dictatorship def: Government by a single person or by a group that is not responsible to the people or their elected representatives.


Patches, Schenectady IS presently a dictatorship.

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 18 - 35
CICERO
February 27, 2013, 11:22am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
18,232
Reputation
68.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -8
Time Online
702 days 15 hours 7 minutes
Quoted from Patches

a decent government.


That's an oxymoron...


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 19 - 35
bumblethru
February 27, 2013, 12:15pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
30,841
Reputation
78.26%
Reputation Score
+36 / -10
Time Online
412 days 18 hours 59 minutes
Quoted from BuckStrider


OFC you fail to even recognize that Hull is part of this destruction process when he founded Metroplex.

But please continue....



you are correct. And although the original goal of the METROPLEX/GILLEN has gone by the way side.....let's not forget...that if the reps were in power, they would be doing the EXACT same thing. It would just be a different 'friends and family' club!

dems or reps.....they are ALL part of the same corrupt system!!!


When the INSANE are running the ASYLUM
In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the rule. -- Friedrich Nietzsche


“How fortunate for those in power that people never think.”
Adolph Hitler
Logged
Private Message Reply: 20 - 35
SueM2342
February 28, 2013, 7:26pm Report to Moderator
Full Member
Posts
281
Reputation
16.67%
Reputation Score
+1 / -5
Time Online
8 days 12 hours 30 minutes
Quoted from rachel72


How many other towns/cities/villages you know where a Mayor fires people for going public with public information? Or where an independent voice gets one booted off the re-election ticket? Or where a lone-independent Council member is excluded from the budget discussions?


Dictatorship def: Government by a single person or by a group that is not responsible to the people or their elected representatives.


Patches, Schenectady IS presently a dictatorship.



Yet the mayor attends a dinner at the state museum on world wide open government
Logged
Private Message Reply: 21 - 35
senders
February 28, 2013, 7:39pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
29,348
Reputation
70.97%
Reputation Score
+22 / -9
Time Online
1574 days 2 hours 22 minutes
INTERESTING AND...........PRICELESS!!!!!

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA


...you are a product of your environment, your environment is a product of your priorities, your priorities are a product of you......

The replacement of morality and conscience with law produces a deadly paradox.


STOP BEING GOOD DEMOCRATS---STOP BEING GOOD REPUBLICANS--START BEING GOOD AMERICANS

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 22 - 35
benny salami
March 2, 2013, 7:28am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
8,861
Reputation
68.97%
Reputation Score
+20 / -9
Time Online
132 days 23 hours 49 minutes
Quoted from Patches
Watch the council meetings....you can get a leg up....especially facial expressions from Brucker.....and the one that sits on the diaz like a dummy....are we in America or not ????.....we ALL have a voice no matter to what party one belongs......dictatorship is not an  option.////


Schenectady has been run like a turd world city for decades. Wild borrowing, a Taj Mahal Garage, Millions to narrow Erie for nonexistent pedestrians, stopping Walgreen's from opening on State and dumping
millions into the suburban playpen at Proctor's. Just Brucker? Add Proctor's DEM stooge Perazzo, charity shop killer Marion Porterhouse and Karl Erickson. You reap what you sow. Karl sat there for 5 years voting as
instructed  by the capo and McCheese. The sad part is he could have done more. He knew and went along for the ride. That the DEM morons are finished using him is no surprise.
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 23 - 35
rachel72
March 2, 2013, 9:27am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
2,249
Reputation
82.35%
Reputation Score
+14 / -3
Time Online
68 days 1 hours 3 minutes
Democrat Carl Erikson, who runs the council's finance committee, pushed his colleagues to make deeper cuts in the budget, which included eliminating some raises for administrators and not filling positions. A contracts manager connected to General Electric, he was appointed by McCarthy in 2010 when one of the only budget critics in the last nine years, City Councilman Mark Blanchfield, a Democrat, left to become a city judge.

"It's funny that everyone says 'what's going on?'" said Erikson about this year's budget debate. "But it's what's supposed to happen."

It also didn't hurt that a rogue element is at work in City Hall. City budget analyst Jason Cuthbert, who was eventually fired for publicly lambasting McCarthy for his sales tax deal with Schenectady County, passed along his spreadsheets that showed some of McCarthy's budget lines were purposely overstated. Most of Cuthbert's suggestions made it in the City Council's final budget.

Meanwhile, McCarthy's behavior during the budget process has appeared perplexing. He vetoed the council's budget last Friday. But when he had the chance Oct. 30 to voice his concerns during the council meeting when they whittled down his budget, he sat silent.

Perazzo said if the mayor had communicated his opinions about the budget throughout, there might have been a more collaborative relationship.

"It's just the style of the current leadership," Perazzo said. "That was I think part of what made this process different."

And then after Tuesday's vote, McCarthy was almost cheerful about the override, saying that the council must have confidence he'll come up with enough revenue to balance next year's spending plan.

"We want to be at the same place," McCarthy said after the vote. "But we're going down two different roads to get there."

When asked about McCarthy's motivation, Erikson said McCarthy perhaps had no problems with the council's changes, but was attempting to appease certain people with his veto — such as employees whose raises got cut by the City Council.

Either way, Erikson said he's not too concerned with how his party views him, even if he's up for re-election in 2013. "I'm not thinking politically for me next year," Erikson said. "If that was the case, I would have gone with Gary's budget."

lstanforth@timesunion.com • 518-454-5697

Read more: http://www.timesunion.com/loca.....31.php#ixzz2MObBGqEJ



Personally, I appreciate that Erikson is not the run-of-the-mill DEM puppet and he's proven it time and time again. He actually knows about contracts..has a real job (not at Proctors)..has a college degree and is standing up to the injustices the DEM machine has been pushing through the Council for decades.

We lose Erikson, might as well just pack up and leave the City now...oh wait...just ask Parent. It's happening all the time!!!
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 24 - 35
benny salami
March 3, 2013, 6:07pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
8,861
Reputation
68.97%
Reputation Score
+20 / -9
Time Online
132 days 23 hours 49 minutes
[quote=891]Meanwhile, McCarthy's behavior during the budget process has appeared perplexing. He vetoed the council's budget last Friday. But when he had the chance Oct. 30 to voice his concerns during the
council meeting when they whittled down his budget, he sat silent. Perazzo said if the mayor had communicated his opinions about the budget throughout, there might have been a more collaborative
relationship.

"It's just the style of the current leadership," Perazo said. "That was I think part of what made this process different."

And then after Tuesday's vote, McCarthy was almost cheerful about the override, saying that the council must have confidence he'll come up with enough revenue to balance next year's spending plan.

"We want to be at the same place," McCarthy said after the vote. "But we're going down two different roads to get there."

They all want to be in bankruptcy court? That's where they are headed. McCheese has style? That's a good one. Nobody wants to use the word  incompetent. The one honest person is removed from office
by the police. As far as Erickson he was right once in 5 years. He is the best of the bad DEM lot. Next to Marion or Proctor's Perazo anyone looks good. Remember Erickson voted for every tax and fee increase
and is head of the pathetic Council Finance Committee. Got taxes?





















Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 25 - 35
rachel72
March 4, 2013, 7:04am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
2,249
Reputation
82.35%
Reputation Score
+14 / -3
Time Online
68 days 1 hours 3 minutes
We're going to have to agree that we disagree on this one Benny.

Here's an appointed guy like Erikson swimming upstream instead of playing brain-dead DEM and voting party line. Have to admit, the man has a backbone...seems like Riggi is a good mentor! Not a Proctors employee, not swayed by political 'duty' but rather, he is a fiscal conservative. Probably the only DEM with fiscal competence within the entire County for that matter!!

He doesn't play politics, he does his job in the best interest of the taxpayers.
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 26 - 35
Admin
March 4, 2013, 9:05am Report to Moderator
Board Moderator
Posts
18,484
Reputation
64.00%
Reputation Score
+16 / -9
Time Online
769 days 23 minutes
Logged
Private Message Reply: 27 - 35
rpforpres
March 4, 2013, 9:27pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
3,891
Reputation
89.47%
Reputation Score
+17 / -2
Time Online
113 days 4 hours 29 minutes
http://blog.timesunion.com/localpolitics/14181/schenectady-dems-discuss-council-elections-saturday/

We’ll likely know after Saturday if City Councilman Carl Erikson will get the endorsement of his party, as the committee is interviewing and endorsing incumbents at a lengthy meeting that day. As we reported, some in the party appear none too pleased with Erikson – who has spoken out on financial issues facing the city.

Democrats are also interviewing possible candidates for City Councilwoman Barbara Blanchard’s seat. Democratic committee chairman Richard Naylor said he won’t reveal the candidates as they haven’t declared their intentions publicly yet. But a party insider said they’ve heard that David Fronk, a county legislature employee; Jean T. Carney, an attorney in the Schenectady County Public Defender’s Office of Family Court (and DA Robert Carney’s sister); and former City Council candidate John Mootooveren have expressed interest. Naylor said there won’t be an endorsement vote on those candidates, however, for a couple of weeks.
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 28 - 35
mikechristine1
March 4, 2013, 10:55pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
9,074
Reputation
71.88%
Reputation Score
+23 / -9
Time Online
99 days 18 hours 36 minutes
Will be interesting for sure




Optimists close their eyes and pretend problems are non existent.  
Better to have open eyes, see the truths, acknowledge the negatives, and
speak up for the people rather than the politicos and their rich cronies.
Logged
Private Message Reply: 29 - 35
3 Pages « 1 2 3 » Recommend Thread
|

Rotterdam NY...the people's voice    Rotterdam's Virtual Internet Community    Outside Rotterdam  ›  Erikson may not have party support

Thread Rating
There is currently no rating for this thread