Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
The Richest Democrats In Congress
Rotterdam NY...the people's voice    Rotterdam's Virtual Internet Community    United States Government  ›  The Richest Democrats In Congress Moderators: Admin
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 128 Guests

The Richest Democrats In Congress  This thread currently has 303 views. |
1 Pages 1 Recommend Thread
Admin
August 22, 2012, 5:54am Report to Moderator
Board Moderator
Posts
18,484
Reputation
64.00%
Reputation Score
+16 / -9
Time Online
769 days 23 minutes
Quoted Text
Dems by far richest in Congress

REP. MICHAEL MCCAUL (R-TX) $290.5 MILLION
SEN. JOHN KERRY (D-MA) $198.8 MILLION
REP. DARRELL ISSA (R-CA) $140.6 MILLION
REP. JARED POLIS (D-CO) $91.1 MILLION
SEN. MARK WARNER (D-VA) $85.9 MILLION
SEN. JAY ROCKEFELLER (D-WV) $83.1 MILLION
SEN. RICHARD BLUMENTHAL (D-CT) $80.1 MILLION
SEN. FRANK LAUTENBERG (D-NJ) $56.9 MILLION
SEN. DIANNE FEINSTEIN (D-CA) $47.2 MILLION
REP. JIM RENACCI (R-OH) $36.7 MILLION

http://www.michaelsavage.wnd.com/2012/08/dems-by-far-richest-in-congress/
Logged
Private Message
joebxr
August 22, 2012, 7:12am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
6,667
Reputation
70.00%
Reputation Score
+14 / -6
Time Online
276 days 6 hours 18 minutes
Quoted Text
Richest Members Of Congress Are Mostly Republicans http://www.huffingtonpost.com/.....p_ref=elections-2012


Here is list of top 50...not sure why they headline REPUBLICANS MOSTLY when DEMOCRATS outnumber them (31 of the 50)
http://thehill.com/business-a-lobbying/243625-the-hills-2012-50-wealthiest-in-congress


JUST BECAUSE SISSY SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO...BUT HE THINKS IT DOES!!!!!  
JUST BECAUSE MC1 SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO!!!!!  
Logged
Private Message Reply: 1 - 4
Rusty Shackleford
August 22, 2012, 7:44am Report to Moderator
Guest User


Logged
E-mail Reply: 2 - 4
CICERO
August 22, 2012, 8:18am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
18,232
Reputation
68.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -8
Time Online
702 days 15 hours 7 minutes
Quoted from joebxr


Here is list of top 50...not sure why they headline REPUBLICANS MOSTLY when DEMOCRATS outnumber them (31 of the 50)http://thehill.com/business-a-lobbying/243625-the-hills-2012-50-wealthiest-in-congress


Aren't statistics fun!!! If you increase or decrease the pool of lawmakers, you can make the headline read anything you want.  Why not the top 15, or top 20, or top 100, or top 5 richest?  Does it really matter?  The fact remains, all of our federal lawmakers are in the 1%-5%.  They are all collecting 6 figure salaries and receive a lifetime of medical benefits and a pension.  

More political smoke and mirrors.  Another distraction.


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 3 - 4
55tbird
August 22, 2012, 8:30am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
3,211
Reputation
91.67%
Reputation Score
+11 / -1
Time Online
209 days 13 hours 13 minutes
Statistics can be massaged to whatever you want to prove. Take gas prices for example.
Boxy loves the fact that we haven't hit the all time "moment in time" price for gas during the Obama administration, when the "moment in time" price really doesn't matter. It's the price over a measured period of time, like say, a calendar year. When you use that measure, 2011 and 2012 will be the two most expensive years to purchase gas in US History.


"Arguing with liberals is like playing chess with a pigeon; no matter how good I am at chess, the pigeon is just going to knock out the pieces, crap on the board, and strut around like it is victorious." - Author Unknown
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 4 - 4
1 Pages 1 Recommend Thread
|


Thread Rating
There is currently no rating for this thread