Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
Paul Ryan in Mitt's VP Choice
Rotterdam NY...the people's voice    Rotterdam's Virtual Internet Community    United States Government  ›  Paul Ryan in Mitt's VP Choice Moderators: Admin
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 87 Guests

Paul Ryan in Mitt's VP Choice  This thread currently has 11,823 views. |
18 Pages « ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 » Recommend Thread
DemocraticVoiceOfReason
August 29, 2012, 9:24pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
12,321
Reputation
20.83%
Reputation Score
+10 / -38
Time Online
151 days 7 hours 5 minutes
Listening to Congressman Paul Ryan speak is very refreshing.  It is great to hear a Roman Catholic politician speak publicly in favor about the Right to Life that EVERY human being has.


George Amedore & Christian Klueg for NYS Senate 2016
Pete Vroman for State Assembly 2016[/size][/color]

"For this is what America is all about. It is the uncrossed desert and the unclimbed ridge. It is the star that is not reached and the harvest that is sleeping in the unplowed ground."
Lyndon Baines Johnson
Logged
Private Message Reply: 225 - 269
Box A Rox
August 30, 2012, 5:28am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes
Listening to Congressman Paul Ryan speak is very refreshing.  It is great to hear a Roman Catholic politician speak publicly in favor about the Right to Life that EVERY human being has.


HUH! DVOR and I agree about one thing:  

"EVERY HUMAN BEING" has a right to life.  


The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 226 - 269
senders
August 30, 2012, 5:46am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
29,348
Reputation
70.97%
Reputation Score
+22 / -9
Time Online
1574 days 2 hours 22 minutes
Quoted from Box A Rox


HUH! DVOR and I agree about one thing:  

"EVERY HUMAN BEING" has a right to life.  


even the human being has a start in the womb....even if it's called a zygote it's still part of a human...
they grow livers/skin/ears etc from these cells in a petri dish....

what if a liver was being grown for you because you needed a transplant...but you ordered a human liver....then
someone decided to abort your liver...it's not a person so who cares? but there is a sheep liver in the next petri dish,
do you take it because you can't wait for the next human liver to be grown?


...you are a product of your environment, your environment is a product of your priorities, your priorities are a product of you......

The replacement of morality and conscience with law produces a deadly paradox.


STOP BEING GOOD DEMOCRATS---STOP BEING GOOD REPUBLICANS--START BEING GOOD AMERICANS

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 227 - 269
Box A Rox
August 30, 2012, 12:22pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes


"President Barack Obama "has doubled the size of government since he took office." Paul Ryan.



Even Ryan’s out-of-date budget data offers no support for the notion that Obama "has doubled
the size of government since he took office."

As the House's budget leader and a key spokesman for his party’s budgetary proposals, Ryan
should have known better. We rate his statement Pants on Fire.

Politifact


The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 228 - 269
CICERO
August 30, 2012, 12:44pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
18,232
Reputation
68.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -8
Time Online
702 days 15 hours 7 minutes
Quoted from Box A Rox


"President Barack Obama "has doubled the size of government since he took office." Paul Ryan.

Even Ryan’s out-of-date budget data offers no support for the notion that Obama "has doubled
the size of government since he took office."

As the House's budget leader and a key spokesman for his party’s budgetary proposals, Ryan
should have known better. We rate his statement Pants on Fire.

Politifact


I agree with the 'Truth-o-Meter.  Obama has proposed one budget and didn't get one vote.  


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 229 - 269
joebxr
August 30, 2012, 1:35pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
6,667
Reputation
70.00%
Reputation Score
+14 / -6
Time Online
276 days 6 hours 18 minutes
Hey DVOR...his speech was so refreshing, huh??????
Quoted Text
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Republican National Convention is drawing to a close with some factually slippery statements coming from the stage.

Most prominently, on the eve of presidential nominee Mitt Romney's speech closing the convention Thursday night, running mate Paul Ryan ignored conspicuous parts of his own record on budget cuts, the stimulus and Medicare in his haste to accuse President Barack Obama of taking the economy off the rails.

A closer look at some of Ryan's remarks Wednesday at the GOP convention in Tampa, Fla.:

___

RYAN: Obama "created a bipartisan debt commission. They came back with an urgent report. He thanked them, sent them on their way and then did exactly nothing."

THE FACTS: It's true that Obama hasn't heeded his commission's recommendations, but Ryan's not the best one to complain. He was a member of the commission and voted against its final report.

___

RYAN: "And the biggest, coldest power play of all in Obamacare came at the expense of the elderly. ... So they just took it all away from Medicare. Seven hundred and sixteen billion dollars, funneled out of Medicare by President Obama."

THE FACTS: Ryan's claim ignores the fact that Ryan himself incorporated the same cuts into budgets he steered through the House in the past two years as chairman of its Budget Committee, using the money for deficit reduction. The cuts, used in part to expand health insurance to more people, do not affect Medicare recipients directly but ultimately could by cutting into the profits of hospitals, health insurance plans and other service providers. Even so, the cuts are part of an overhaul that extends the solvency of Medicare's giant trust fund by eight years.

___

RYAN: "The stimulus was a case of political patronage, corporate welfare and cronyism at their worst. You, the working men and women of this country, were cut out of the deal."

THE FACTS: Ryan himself asked for stimulus money shortly after Congress approved the $800 billion plan, known as the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. Ryan's pleas to federal agencies included letters to Energy Secretary Steven Chu and Labor Secretary Hilda Solis seeking stimulus grant money for two Wisconsin energy conservation companies.

One of them, the nonprofit Wisconsin Energy Conservation Corp., received $20.3 million from the Energy Department to help homes and businesses improve energy efficiency, according to federal records. That company, he said in his letter, would build "sustainable demand for green jobs." Another eventual recipient, the Energy Center of Wisconsin, received about $365,000.

___

RYAN: Said Obama misled people in Ryan's hometown of Janesville, Wis., by making them think a General Motors plant there threatened with closure could be saved. "A lot of guys I went to high school with worked at that GM plant. Right there at that plant, candidate Obama said: 'I believe that if our government is there to support you ... this plant will be here for another hundred years.' That's what he said in 2008. Well, as it turned out, that plant didn't last another year."

THE FACTS: Although Obama did not explicitly promise to save the plant, Ryan is right that Obama implied that he had the backs of its workers when he spoke at the factory early in 2008 and issued a statement about its closure later. The plant halted production in December 2008, weeks before Obama took office and well before he enacted a more robust auto industry bailout that rescued GM and Chrysler and allowed the majority of their plants — though not the Janesville facility — to stay in operation. Ryan himself voted for an auto bailout under President George W. Bush that was designed to help GM, but he was a vocal critic of the one pushed through by Obama that has been widely credited with revitalizing both GM and Chrysler.


JUST BECAUSE SISSY SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO...BUT HE THINKS IT DOES!!!!!  
JUST BECAUSE MC1 SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO!!!!!  
Logged
Private Message Reply: 230 - 269
Shadow
August 30, 2012, 2:45pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
11,107
Reputation
70.83%
Reputation Score
+17 / -7
Time Online
448 days 17 minutes
The reason Ryan voted against the comissions recommendation was because they wouldn't tackle entitlement reform which is where real money can be saved. I ran across that info while looking for something else.  This is the Jainsville statement: His aides point out -- and GM confirms -- that the plant was not shut down per se but idled, meaning it could be reactivated at any time.

However, nothing Ryan said in his speech about the plant was factually untrue.

Ryan stated in his convention speech that "we were about to lose a major factory" in the town at the time Obama showed up there. And though he compressed then-Sen. Obama's remarks, Ryan did not distort them.

This is what Obama said at the time: "I believe that if our government is there to support you, and give you the assistance you need to re-tool and make this transition, that this plant will be here for another hundred years."


Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politic.....0sbQjUs:  
Logged
Private Message Reply: 231 - 269
joebxr
August 30, 2012, 2:58pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
6,667
Reputation
70.00%
Reputation Score
+14 / -6
Time Online
276 days 6 hours 18 minutes
Quoted from Shadow
The reason Ryan voted against the comissions recommendation was because they wouldn't tackle entitlement reform which is where real money can be saved. I ran across that info while looking for something else.  This is the Jainsville statement: His aides point out -- and GM confirms -- that the plant was not shut down per se but idled, meaning it could be reactivated at any time.

However, nothing Ryan said in his speech about the plant was factually untrue.

Ryan stated in his convention speech that "we were about to lose a major factory" in the town at the time Obama showed up there. And though he compressed then-Sen. Obama's remarks, Ryan did not distort them.

This is what Obama said at the time: "I believe that if our government is there to support you, and give you the assistance you need to re-tool and make this transition, that this plant will be here for another hundred years."


Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politic.....0sbQjUs:  


Not disputing...but on the GM plant issue, I think Ryan "misled" people in his speech becuase:
"The plant halted production in December 2008, weeks before Obama took office and well before he enacted a more robust auto industry bailout "
and why is Obama a bad guy for ignoring the commisson recommendation when Ryan was on the commission and disagreed with it....why point it out as a fault of Obama's


JUST BECAUSE SISSY SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO...BUT HE THINKS IT DOES!!!!!  
JUST BECAUSE MC1 SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO!!!!!  
Logged
Private Message Reply: 232 - 269
Rusty Shackleford
August 30, 2012, 3:09pm Report to Moderator
Guest User
Quoted Text
THE FACTS: Ryan himself asked for stimulus money shortly after Congress approved the $800 billion plan, known as the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. Ryan's pleas to federal agencies included letters to Energy Secretary Steven Chu and Labor Secretary Hilda Solis seeking stimulus grant money for two Wisconsin energy conservation companies.

One of them, the nonprofit Wisconsin Energy Conservation Corp., received $20.3 million from the Energy Department to help homes and businesses improve energy efficiency, according to federal records. That company, he said in his letter, would build "sustainable demand for green jobs." Another eventual recipient, the Energy Center of Wisconsin, received about $365,000.



How DARE he think about helping homes and businesses improve energy efficiency?   What was he thinking trying to help people, taxpayers, save money on their energy bills?  He must be bad, we should all vote for Barry instead.

http://www.weccusa.org/main/newscurrentnews/title/Current%20news

How dare them employ more people (wait, did those numbers get counted Barry?). ( With 15 employees in 1997, WECC was driven by the passion, knowledge and dedication of its staff. Today, with approximately 200 employees, that drive is as strong as ever. )  

How dare they cut consumers (and businesses) energy costs by harnessing wind and solar.  Unlike Solyndra, they're still in business, they must be bad.


Give me a break - you're presenting one side of the argument, and not being truthful with the people you're speaking to.

Logged
E-mail Reply: 233 - 269
DemocraticVoiceOfReason
August 30, 2012, 3:40pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
12,321
Reputation
20.83%
Reputation Score
+10 / -38
Time Online
151 days 7 hours 5 minutes
Since Obama used taxpayer dollars to bail out GM, he could easily have insisted that GM reopen the Janesville, WI plant as part of the deal to bail the company out.


George Amedore & Christian Klueg for NYS Senate 2016
Pete Vroman for State Assembly 2016[/size][/color]

"For this is what America is all about. It is the uncrossed desert and the unclimbed ridge. It is the star that is not reached and the harvest that is sleeping in the unplowed ground."
Lyndon Baines Johnson
Logged
Private Message Reply: 234 - 269
Shadow
August 30, 2012, 3:49pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
11,107
Reputation
70.83%
Reputation Score
+17 / -7
Time Online
448 days 17 minutes
Obama isn't the bad guy in the closing of the plant in Jainsville, WI but I think that the people who heard him say that with improvements, the plant could be reopened and prosperous again were disappointed and lost jobs. Because the Federal Govt was involved in the bankruptcy proceedings they blamed Obama. The same thing happened with the steel plant that Romney/Bain gets blamed for, markets dry up and some businesses have to be closed.
Logged
Private Message Reply: 235 - 269
joebxr
August 30, 2012, 3:52pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
6,667
Reputation
70.00%
Reputation Score
+14 / -6
Time Online
276 days 6 hours 18 minutes
Since Obama used taxpayer dollars to bail out GM, he could easily have insisted that GM reopen the Janesville, WI plant as part of the deal to bail the company out.


Quoted Text
Last night Paul Ryan said that Obama failed to save a GM plant in Janesville, Wis. Many outlets — including Wonkblog — said that was a lie. But some conservatives have tried to salvage the claim. Jonathan Adler of the National Review asks, “What was ‘false’ in Ryan’s statement? Was Janesvile ‘about to lose’ the factory at the time of the election? Yes. Did Obama fail to prevent this as he had promised? Yes.”

Let’s break down, then, the exact chronology of the Janesville plant closing; Conn Carroll of the Washington Examiner has helpfully posted one here, which I add to below. The basic takeaway, however, is this: by December 2008, the plant had reached a point of no return where the plant would be shut down regardless of federal action. Ryan was faulting Obama for an that was event that was inevitable over a month before he took office.

February 2008: At a campaign stop in Janesville, Obama says, ”I believe that if our government is there to support you, and give you the assistance you need to re-tool and make this transition, that this plant will be here for another hundred years.” As Politifact writes, “That’s a statement of belief that, with government help, the Janesville plant could remain open — but not a promise to keep it open.”

June 3, 2008 – GM decides to close the Janesville plant, announcing that production will end by 2010, after months of rumors it might close. The press release declares, “Janesville, Wisconsin, will cease production of medium-duty trucks by the end of 2009, and of the Tahoe, Suburban and Yukon in 2010, or sooner.” Senators Herb Kohl and Russ Feingold, both Democrats, and Paul Ryan, whose House district includes Janesville, write the company urging it to reverse the decision.

September 2008 – Paul Ryan flies to Detroit to urge GM to reconsider its decision to close the plant. According to the Los Angeles Times, he pitched “a $224-million proposal that included roughly $50 million in state enterprise zone tax credits, local government grants worth $22 million and major contract concessions from the United Auto Workers union local.” Throughout, Ryan frequently speaks with GM chief Rick Wagoner.

Oct. 11, 2008 – Barack Obama comments on the Janesville closing. He does not promise to prevent the closing-in-progress, but instead declares he will “retool plants like the GM facility in Janesville” (emphasis mine) as president. Regardless of one’s views of the auto bailout, it has saved facilities like the Janesville one, if not the Janesville one in particular.

November/December 2008 – Congress weighs a bailout of GM and other automakers. One proposal, backed by Ryan and 31 other House Republicans, but not Mitt Romney, would have provided $15 billion in bridge loans. The bill passed the house but was not picked up by the Senate. The Bush administration declines to use TARP funds to rescue automakers, but approves a bridge loan on Dec.19, too late to save the Janesville plant.

Dec. 23, 2008 – Lacking a bailout, the plant closes. The plant holds a “final goodbye ceremony” as it builds its last SUV. In a statement to MSNBC, GM confirmed that the plant “was idled” in December. But — and this is where it gets confusing — winding down a plant takes time.

April 21, 2009 – The Janesville plant builds its last medium-duty truck and shuts down its last assembly line, completing the shutdown process started in June 2008.

In short, the Janesville shutdown commenced in June 2008. Once it was clear that aid wasn’t forthcoming in November, actual assembly lines were being shut down by December. It is true that Paul Ryan tried to get the Obama administration to save another plant, in Kenosha, which the Obama administration failed to do. Attacking Obama for that is fair. But hitting him for Janesville is dishonest. The first assembly line stopped rolling in December 2008. Workers unfurled banners declaring the “Last Vehicles Off the Janesville Line” at a “final goodbye ceremony,” The plant was closing regardless of what Obama did.

This is a very strange dispute, in a way. Mitt Romney wrote an op-ed in the New York Times under the title “Let Detroit Go Bankrupt,” and now his campaign is trying hard to fault Obama for not bailing out automakers aggressively enough. Not only that, but after the campaign’s repeated denunciation of the Obama administration for “picking winners,” Ryan is faulting Obama for not “picking a winner” not just among companies, but among plants. He’s attacking Obama for not using the government to micromanage GM’s affairs.



JUST BECAUSE SISSY SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO...BUT HE THINKS IT DOES!!!!!  
JUST BECAUSE MC1 SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO!!!!!  
Logged
Private Message Reply: 236 - 269
DemocraticVoiceOfReason
August 30, 2012, 4:23pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
12,321
Reputation
20.83%
Reputation Score
+10 / -38
Time Online
151 days 7 hours 5 minutes
Obama could have made reopening the Janesville plant a condition of bailing GM out.   GM has a 45 plants  OUTSIDE the United States -- they could have been "convinced" to close or scale back one or more of those plants and bring those jobs to Janesville.    





George Amedore & Christian Klueg for NYS Senate 2016
Pete Vroman for State Assembly 2016[/size][/color]

"For this is what America is all about. It is the uncrossed desert and the unclimbed ridge. It is the star that is not reached and the harvest that is sleeping in the unplowed ground."
Lyndon Baines Johnson
Logged
Private Message Reply: 237 - 269
Box A Rox
August 30, 2012, 4:31pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes
Obama could have made reopening the Janesville plant a condition of bailing GM out.   GM has a 45 plants  OUTSIDE the United States -- they could have been "convinced" to close or scale back one or more of those plants and bring those jobs to Janesville.    


If every congressman and Senator meddled in the internal decisions of which GM plant to keep and which
one to shut down... GM would have gone bankrupt in spite of the bail out.
The GM bailout has kept over 1,000,000 jobs in the USA. Thank you Barack Hussein Obama!

Mitt Romney's idea for GM's problems???
"Romney called for a "managed bankruptcy."


The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 238 - 269
Shadow
August 30, 2012, 4:57pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
11,107
Reputation
70.83%
Reputation Score
+17 / -7
Time Online
448 days 17 minutes
The problem I had with the GM bailout was the Federal Govt allowing the union to superced the bond holders when they should have been taken care of first financially. Who in their right mind would ever invest in bonds backing a company, city, or project when the government might step in and give the money to somebody else. I also felt that the salaried employees of Delfi weren't treated fairly when their pensions were cut by 30 to 40%.
Logged
Private Message Reply: 239 - 269
18 Pages « ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 » Recommend Thread
|


Thread Rating
There is currently no rating for this thread