Was just going through the channels on TV and caught the council committee meeting on. Ah, here it comes, discussing whether the council should approve the issuance of some alcohol permit to Proctors for some event. It's not that it's a vote tonight but those of us who understand these meetings know that they discuss things that will be put on the agenda and then the caucus they talk about the things they will talk about at the regular meeting a half hour later when a vote on whatever will be taken.
So, I trust we will hear that this will NOT be on the "consent" agenda because Perazzo cannot vote, she would be mandated to abstain because her employer stands to gain (or lose) by her vote?
I'd like to know why she was saying even one word about it at the committee meeting tonight.
Oh, wait, this is the dems, they don't believe in ethics. It's not in their vocabulary. Speaking of ethics, wonder where the public disclosure details are of town officials is. Hmmmm
.
. |