Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
New York Ranked LAST!
Rotterdam NY...the people's voice    Rotterdam's Virtual Internet Community    New York State  ›  New York Ranked LAST! Moderators: Admin
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 25 Guests

New York Ranked LAST!  This thread currently has 2,728 views. |
3 Pages 1 2 3 » Recommend Thread
Admin
April 30, 2012, 4:58am Report to Moderator
Board Moderator
Posts
18,484
Reputation
64.00%
Reputation Score
+16 / -9
Time Online
769 days 23 minutes
Quoted Text
NY ranked last in economic outlook study due to 'excessive' tax, spending policies
By GREGORY BRESIGER
Last Updated: 9:05 AM, April 29, 2012
Posted: 10:03 PM, April 28, 2012

New York’s the pits — especially when it comes to economic development, according to a new study.
The Empire State ranked dead last when it comes to its economic outlook based on Albany’s tax policy.
The report, authored by economists Arthur Laffer, Jonathan Williams and Stephen Moore, gives New York state, along with New Jersey (45) and California (46), low marks because of excessive tax and spending policies that hurt businesses and individuals.
“We hate to keep picking on California, New Jersey and New York, but they continue to be models of how not to govern a state,” the report warned. “These three states,” the report continued, “impose tax rates at or near the highest in the nation and about twice the national average.”

New York placed 50th for its high personal and corporate tax rates, 12.62 percent and 15.99 percent, respectively.
The annual report, “Rich States, Poor States” by the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC), also takes aim at taxing big earners to close budget shortfalls..........................>>>>...................>>>>...............Read more: http://www.nypost.com/p/news/business/ny_state_of_decline_tbK1BlfnsBcHI9oeO9r4lK#ixzz1tWL4fE2t
Logged
Private Message
Box A Rox
April 30, 2012, 6:10am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes
I was a little concerned about this report until I read this line:

~ "The annual report, “Rich States, Poor States” by the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC)" ~

For those of you who don't know ALEC, it's a group dominated by:
The Koch Brothers,
big tobacco,
insurance companies,
and the drug industry


12 Major American companies have abandoned ALEC just this year:
Kraft,
Pepsi,
Coca-Cola,
Intuit,
the Gates Foundation,
McDonalds,
Wendy’s,
Arizona Public Service,
Mars, Inc.,
American Traffic Solutions,
Reed Elsevier,
Blue-Cross Blue Shield
Yum Brands (KFC, Taco Bell, Pizza Hut).

Want to learn more about ALEC...
http://www.justice.org/cps/rde/xchg/justice/hs.xsl/15044.htm


The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 1 - 30
Shadow
April 30, 2012, 6:15am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
11,107
Reputation
70.83%
Reputation Score
+17 / -7
Time Online
448 days 17 minutes
Our elite politicians will never change the way they govern NYS with their taxing and spending mentality until they've bankrupted the state.
Logged
Private Message Reply: 2 - 30
littlesal
April 30, 2012, 6:44am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
842
Reputation
66.67%
Reputation Score
+4 / -2
Time Online
232 days 18 hours 19 minutes

NYS is great for business    

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/04/29/new-york-city-mulling-happy-hour-ban/

Happy hour in New York City could end if Department of Health policy party-poopers go ahead with a proposal to outlaw beer and booze specials at bars and restaurants, sources told The Post.
"It's absolutely been discussed," confirmed a department source. "It goes to show you the spirit with which they operate. Everyone is a child."
High-level conversations have gone beyond merely "throwing pencils on the ceiling and seeing what sticks," another Health source revealed.
Sources said the happy-hour ban is being pushed by the agency's marathon-running boss, Commissioner Thomas Farley, and is serious enough for one source to say the alcohol lobby had better find itself a good lawyer.
Agency spokesman Sam Miller denied existing "plans to pursue any policy around discount-alcohol sale."
But sources said the anti-booze sentiment at the agency has reached a fever pitch, with officials recently asking state officials about the "legality of liquor in ice cream," referring to potent products infused with bourbon, rum and tequila.


Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/04/29/new-york-city-mulling-happy-hour-ban/#ixzz1tWjTWrAv
Logged
Private Message Reply: 3 - 30
littlesal
April 30, 2012, 6:49am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
842
Reputation
66.67%
Reputation Score
+4 / -2
Time Online
232 days 18 hours 19 minutes
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/07/nyregion/07farley.html?pagewanted=all

IT was still dark when Dr. Thomas A. Farley got to Central Park on a cool October morning and started stretching his grasshopperlike legs, blending into the background in black shorts and a T-shirt. He was training for the New York City Marathon, and would not let a sore Achilles’ tendon stop him from a four-mile run.
Enlarge This Image

Ruby Washington/The New York Times
Dr. Farley stressing the value of exercise — tie and all — in Brownsville, Brooklyn.
Enlarge This Image

Jennifer S. Altman for The New York Times
After a run in Central Park, Dr. Farley ordered a naked bagel and fruit salad at a Starbucks.
Enlarge This Image

Ruby Washington/The New York Times
Dr. Farley says the entire cultural landscape must be changed to make bad choices harder and good ones easier, even if the change has to be engineered and legislated.
Dr. Farley, the city’s health commissioner, exercises seven days a week, loves his vegetables and has never smoked a cigarette. He has barely a ripple of fat and has run 15 marathons over the past 34 years, finishing all but the last, in New Orleans in 2008. He had had a fever the day before the race, and decided to stay home. But in the morning, he changed his mind and ran.

“For 19 miles I was O.K.,” Dr. Farley recalled. “At the 22nd mile the course ran right by my house. I rang the bell.” His wife opened the door. He said to her, “I’m done.”

It figures that his risky indulgence is a strong competitive instinct — not cigarettes or sloth.

In his sparsely furnished office in Lower Manhattan, Dr. Farley is Clark Kent, smiling mildly behind his glasses, his plain gray suit hanging on his wiry 6-foot-2 runner’s frame. But in public health, he is fast emerging as Superman, able to reframe public debate in a single op-ed article about whether poor people should be allowed to buy Cokes with food stamps.

He has urged what he calls curve shifting, an overhaul of human behavior toward healthier living. But to do this, he says, the entire cultural landscape must be changed to make bad choices harder and good ones easier, even if it has to be engineered by the government.


The commissioner wants New Yorkers to quit smoking in parks and beaches, take the stairs, cut the salt, lose weight, swear off sugary drinks, have safe sex and drink less alcohol; and he advocates legislation, taxes and industry regulation to help them do it.

Dr. Farley has the mind of a Madison Avenue advertising executive, or a master propagandist, to the dismay of some who think he puts ideological zeal above science. A city advertising campaign, for example, equated drinking sugary soda with adding pounds, without regard for mitigating factors like diet and exercise.

He has accumulated a nettlesome list of opponents: some of those who advocate for food-stamp recipients and the poor; the beverage industry; big tobacco; convenience stores; defenders of free will against the “nanny state”; and a few skeptical scientists who say he is conducting a vast population experiment with no control group.

Asked whether he ever feels like a killjoy, Dr. Farley said, “When I see someone who’s 45 years old with obesity and diabetes and hypertension taking five pills a day and struggling to walk around because of their arthritis from their obesity, that doesn’t seem like a lot of fun to me.”

At 54, he looks like his own ideal, his natural thinness honed by regular running, biking and swimming. “This is what I weighed in college,” he said matter-of-factly. He described himself as having “lucky genes in the era of excess,” but acknowledged that he might not have fared well in the Stone Age. “If I lived in the era of hunter-gatherers,” he said, “I would be the first to go.”

Dr. Farley is elated to have gone from expounding his theories of lifestyle change to little notice as an academic in New Orleans to working for a man, Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg, who has staked his reputation on being to health what former Mayor Rudolph W. Giuliani was to crime. Mr. Bloomberg chose Dr. Farley for the $205,000-a-year job 18 months ago after President Obama elevated the previous commissioner, Dr. Thomas R. Frieden, to direct the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

The health commissioner’s job provides a powerful bully pulpit, but it is unclear how far Dr. Farley will be able to advance his agenda during the mayor’s third and last term, since mayors often lose steam toward the end of their tenures. On a radio program in September, Mr. Bloomberg absent-mindedly called Dr. Farley, who was in the studio with him, Tom Frieden, then Tom Friedman (an Op-Ed columnist for The New York Times), then Tom Foley (former speaker of the House?).

“I picked Foley, Tom Foley, because we didn’t have to change the monograms on the towels,” the mayor joked.

“Farley,” the radio host, John Gambling, corrected.

“Farley,” the mayor conceded.

Later, the health commissioner said graciously, “He has more of a head for facts and figures, not so much names.”

DR. FARLEY grew up in Westfield, N.J., the sixth of eight children. His father was a patent lawyer, his mother a full-time parent.

He graduated phi beta kappa from Haverford College in 1977, then received medical and master’s degrees at Tulane University in New Orleans. He is a pediatrician but has never been in private practice; he spent a year in Haiti, then did stints at the C.D.C. and the Louisiana Office of Public Health. For the decade before coming to New York, he was chairman of Tulane’s community health sciences department.

The commissioner and his wife, Alice, a pediatrician who plans to work in community clinics and school health centers, have four daughters, ages 16 to 24, and live on the Upper West Side. After Hurricane Katrina, the family spent a few months living in the house where Dr. Farley grew up, while he shuttled back and forth to Louisiana, working through the C.D.C. on how to rebuild the health system.

His eldest daughter, Emily, a 2008 graduate of Princeton University, joined Teach for America and is teaching high school in New Orleans. Dr. Farley once gave a guest lecture to his daughter’s students, doing hypothetical math problems to find out which foods had made people sick at a church picnic. It did not exactly rivet their attention. “The minute he started talking, I was like, ‘Oh, no. His delivery isn’t strong enough,’ ” Emily Farley told the Princeton Alumni Weekly.

Dr. Farley is more forceful in print. His 2005 book, “Prescription for a Healthy Nation,” which he wrote with Dr. Deborah A. Cohen, senior natural scientist at the Rand Corporation, foreshadowed his hair-shirt approach to public health in New York. In its review, Publishers Weekly characterized the authors as “scolds” and “puritanical,” and predicted that Americans would react to their nostrums the way Emily Farley’s students did: apathetically.

Now that science has beaten back infectious diseases like cholera, influenza and polio, public health is largely reimagining itself to fight chronic diseases like obesity, hypertension and high cholesterol. Dr. Farley, in turn, has made it his mission to foment not the next revolution in drugs, vaccines or germ-fighting, but lifestyle changes that offer New Yorkers the implicit promise of living forever — or at least longer.

Promoting behavior change, Dr. Farley likes to say, is the 21st century’s equivalent of 19th-century advances in sanitation, and “Prescription for a Healthy Nation” heralds that agenda. With characteristic modesty, Dr. Farley insists that the ideas in the book are Dr. Cohen’s and that she came to him because she needed a writer. The book is strikingly agnostic when it comes to doctors, suggesting that medical intervention is overrated, and that even to the degree that it works, too many people trip it up by refusing or neglecting to follow directions.

“Mistakes account for only a minor fraction of the total deaths caused by modern medicine,” Dr. Farley says in the book. “Many more die from medicines or procedures even when medical care is standard practice and the doctors perform flawlessly.”

In a chapter called “Humans Behaving Badly,” Dr. Farley writes admiringly of the reward-and-punishment system of behaviorist theory. “B. F. Skinner would have predicted that health education programs directed at individuals would fail,” he writes. “He would have proposed (he did propose) that if we really want to change how we behave, we must change the environment in which we live.”

IN New York, Dr. Farley has promulgated the behaviorist message. The advertising campaigns his department has run show disgusting or upsetting images — the punishment — and promise better health — the reward — for behavior change.

Under his direction, New York began requiring stores that sold cigarettes to post images of diseased brains, lungs and teeth next to cash registers. Tobacco companies and convenience stores have fought back with a First Amendment lawsuit. In March, the city introduced a television, radio and print campaign, “Reverse the Damage,” which, Mr. Bloomberg said, was “perhaps the hardest hitting antismoking campaign we’ve ever run.” Images of lung cancer and heart disease are followed by positive messages: “20 minutes after you quit smoking, your blood pressure decreases,” and “one year after you quit smoking, your risk of heart attack is cut in half.”

But recent revelations about the health department’s internal debate over its antisoda campaign have underlined complaints that Dr. Farley’s more lifestyle-oriented crusades are based on common-sense bromides that may not withstand strict scientific scrutiny.

The Times reported last month that Dr. Farley, in a series of e-mails, overruled his chief nutritionist and others who had raised concerns about the accuracy of the campaign, “Pouring on the Pounds.” It features a YouTube video of a young man guzzling a glass of soda as goopy fat runs down his chin. The ad warns that drinking a can of soda a day “can make you 10 pounds fatter a year,” without any disclaimer that people gain weight differently.

The health department says that soda is more responsible for the rise in obesity than other sweets, that artificial trans fats are worse than natural saturated fats and that everyone should eat substantially less salt. But there are some critics who say that the statistical evidence that soda is causing the obesity epidemic is weak, and that eliminating trans fats may give people a false sense of virtue when eating other unhealthful foods made with saturated fats, like doughnuts.

Dr. Michael Alderman, editor of the American Journal of Hypertension and a professor at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, said reducing sodium on the scale that Dr. Farley was recommending could lead to good and bad physiological changes. “It’s an experiment; we don’t know what’s going to happen,” said Dr. Alderman, who is an unpaid adviser to the Salt Institute, a trade group. “Should we do a randomized clinical trial on 10,000 people like we always do? Or should we just impose it on millions of people?”

He said that other inadequately tested interventions, like postmenopausal hormone therapy and low-fat diets, had backfired, adding, “There’s almost a law in this world, when you do things without solid scientific evidence, there are unintended consequences.”

Safe sex has been another of Dr. Farley’s obsessions; in 2002, he caused a splash with a Washington Monthly article describing, in graphic detail, his $8 visit to a gay bathhouse as a scientific voyeur. (Headline: “Cruise Control: Bathhouses are reigniting the AIDS crisis. It’s time to shut them down.”) Some gay rights advocates in New York feared he would try to shut down the city’s few remaining bathhouses, but Dr. Farley said recently that he had crossed the issue off his agenda.

“The Internet is now the biggest meeting place for men who have sex with men,” he said.

Behind the glitzy ad campaigns is a health department filled with unsung but highly credentialed data-driven researchers, who each year compile a survey of New Yorkers’ habits and attitudes. At a recent staff meeting, Dr. Farley and five senior employees worked to winnow a list of 242 proposed questions to 151.

Dr. Farley favored topics like blood pressure and diabetes, but was cool to a series of questions on emergency preparedness: whether people had packed a go-bag and set up a meeting place with their children. Looking at questions about alcohol and drug use, he vetoed a suggestion to change the words of a question from “wine coolers” to “alcopops” and expressed doubts that anyone would admit to stealing narcotic prescriptions. The injury experts wanted to ask about gun ownership, but others doubted people would tell the truth.

“It would be nice if we had firearms, don’t you think?” Dr. Farley said.

“I knew he was going to say that!” exclaimed Dr. Carolyn Greene, a deputy commissioner.

On a query about whether people read the nutrition facts on grocery labels, he said, “Just ask about sodium.”

Dr. Farley was fascinated by noise, interested in whether people had hired exterminators to get rid of bedbugs and bored by inquiries about drinking filtered, bottled, tap or seltzer water. “If we had to kill off some questions, I’d kill both water questions,” he said.

WHEN Dr. Farley first heard Mr. Bloomberg speak, in 2006, he said, he immediately recognized “a kindred spirit.” So he e-mailed Dr. Frieden, complimenting the work being done in New York. This led to a post as an adviser to the city health department from 2007 to 2008, for which he earned $161,000.

So it was with a rhetorical wink that Mr. Bloomberg announced the next year that he was appointing Dr. Farley after a nationwide search.

In the first seven years of the Bloomberg administration, Dr. Frieden laid the foundation for Dr. Farley’s behavior-change mantra. New York banned smoking in bars and restaurants and barred trans fats from restaurants. It required chain restaurants to post calorie counts and began negotiating with food companies to voluntarily limit salt in packaged food.

When Dr. Farley took over, he set his sights on weight loss. After lobbying Albany for a soda tax, which failed, the commissioner last month advanced his highest-profile initiative yet. In an essay in The Times, he revealed that the Bloomberg administration wanted federal permission to stop poor New Yorkers from using food stamps for soda and other sugary drinks.

Usually, it is conservative and corporate voices that go after Dr. Farley. This time, traditional liberals accused him of stigmatizing poor people.

“To say that low-income people are uniquely irresponsible, ignoring the Paris Hiltons of the world — I find the message offensive and counterproductive,” complained Joel Berg, executive director of the New York City Coalition Against Hunger.

Mr. Berg said he was not “in any way, shape or form pro-soda,” but added, “I’m used to fighting with conservatives, and it’s particularly heartbreaking on this issue that I’m fighting with people who should be natural allies.”

Though the federal government will most likely reject the proposal, Dr. Farley said he was happy to have sparked a national debate.

DR. FARLEY began running in high school, on the cross-country team, and “basically never stopped,” he said, despite injuries that have forced him to take months, even a year, off; he heads out to the park most mornings at 6. “I would rather have orthopedic problems than cardiology problems,” he said.

He eats parsimoniously (and, he said, “very rarely” indulges in a soda). After the four-mile run the other day, he ordered a naked bagel and fruit salad at a Starbucks, nothing to wash it down.

“I completely understand” the urge to eat junk food, Dr. Farley said. If someone puts something he should not eat in front of him, he said, he has to push it away or he will eat it.

He ran his first marathon in Philadelphia in 1976. His fastest was a decade later, in Paris: 2:59:40. He expects to finish the race on Sunday — his third in New York — in 3:15.

On the training run, he tolerated a reporter’s slower pace for a while, but when given permission to go ahead, he grinned and bounded away. The sunrise beckoned over the reservoir, and it would have been easy to stop and enjoy it, but suddenly, it seemed wrong. Dr. Farley’s drive was infectious.
Logged
Private Message Reply: 4 - 30
Box A Rox
April 30, 2012, 6:56am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes
Quoted from Shadow
Our elite politicians will never change the way they govern NYS with their taxing and spending mentality until they've bankrupted the state.


NY State... If NY State were a country instead of a state it would rank 16th in GDP in the world.

Rank by country/
or
U.S. State     GDP
(millions of USD)
—      World     62,220,000
1      United States     14,620,000
2      China     5,879,100
3      Japan     5,391,000
4      Germany     3,306,000
5      France     2,555,000
6      Brazil             2,518,000
7      United Kingdom2,259,000
8      Italy      2,037,000
9      California     1,911,822
10      Canada     1,564,000
11      Russia     1,477,000
12      India      1,430,000
13      Spain     1,375,000
14      Australia     1,220,000
15      Texas     1,158,194
16      New York     1,078,161


The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 5 - 30
CICERO
April 30, 2012, 7:19am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
18,232
Reputation
68.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -8
Time Online
702 days 15 hours 7 minutes
I don't need the Koch Brothers, Drug Industry, Insurance Industry , and Big Tabacco to tell me NYS is "excessively" taxed.  Just purchase something at 8% tax, look at the taxes on your phone and energy bills, go buy a house and find out how much you pay on mortgage tax(even on refinance), and then open your property and school tax bill.

Nope, I pretty much figured it out on my own.  


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 6 - 30
Shadow
April 30, 2012, 7:32am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
11,107
Reputation
70.83%
Reputation Score
+17 / -7
Time Online
448 days 17 minutes
You forgot the tax on gas and oil Cicero.
Logged
Private Message Reply: 7 - 30
MobileTerminal
April 30, 2012, 7:46am Report to Moderator
Guest User
and tobacco
Logged
E-mail Reply: 8 - 30
Shadow
April 30, 2012, 8:23am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
11,107
Reputation
70.83%
Reputation Score
+17 / -7
Time Online
448 days 17 minutes
The majority of those countries/states are all going bankrupt with a few exceptions.
Logged
Private Message Reply: 9 - 30
GrahamBonnet
May 2, 2012, 11:16am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
9,643
Reputation
66.67%
Reputation Score
+16 / -8
Time Online
131 days 7 hours 47 minutes
When Wall Street moves as the NYSE high-tails it to Texas, NY will go from 16th to 516th pretty fast.


"While Foreign Terrorists were plotting to murder and maim using homemade bombs in Boston, Democrap officials in Washington DC, Albany and here were busy watching ME and other law abiding American Citizens who are gun owners and taxpayers, in an effort to blame the nation's lack of security on US so that they could have a political scapegoat."
Logged
Private Message Reply: 10 - 30
rampage
May 2, 2012, 12:26pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
1,773
Reputation
70.00%
Reputation Score
+7 / -3
Time Online
61 days 1 hours 26 minutes
Boxy must have found some website with these numbers on it, and as usual is spewing it as fact, when he hasn't even taken the time to review it.  The issue comes up with the listings that are on here, and ironically, if Box had reviewed it, he/she would be even HAPPIER that business is booming in NY, as we would actually be 15th.  I mean, unless you're going to count all the states in the US with the exception of those that are already broken out on this list.  I'm assuming this, as the US would still be #1, excluding California, Texas and NY, but I can't see how any of the other 47 states are going to come up higher on that list.

As far as your note that... "If NY State were a country," would you just do yourself a favor before you look more like an idiot and look up the definition of the word state.  I even bolded and made bigger the appropriate definition of the word for you to consider.  IF New York were a country.  LOL

Quoted Text
state   /steɪt/ Show Spelled [steyt] Show IPA ,noun, adjective, verb, stat·ed, stat·ing.  
noun
1. the condition of a person or thing, as with respect to circumstances or attributes: a state of health.
2. the condition of matter with respect to structure, form, constitution, phase, or the like: water in a gaseous state.
3. status, rank, or position in life; station: He dresses in a manner befitting his state.
4. the style of living befitting a person of wealth and high rank: to travel in state.
5. a particular condition of mind or feeling: to be in an excited state.
EXPAND
6. an abnormally tense, nervous, or perturbed condition: He's been in a state since hearing about his brother's death.
7. a politically unified people occupying a definite territory; nation.
8. the territory, or one of the territories, of a government.
9. ( sometimes initial capital letter ) any of the bodies politic which together make up a federal union, as in the United States of America.
10. the body politic as organized for civil rule and government ( distinguished from church).
11. the operations or activities of a central civil government: affairs of state.
12. ( initial capital letter ) Also called State Department.  Informal . the Department of State.
13. Printing . a set of copies of an edition of a publication which differ from others of the same printing because of additions, corrections, or transpositions made during printing or at any time before publication.
14. the States, Informal . the United States (usually used outside its borders): After a year's study in Spain, he returned to the States.


And congratulations, you now know what the GDP is.  Now, what is the NDP (you know, after costs, i.e. taxes, labor, etc.)?


Reignite Rotterdam
c/o MARY L. FAHY


Kidney Wheels, (800) 999-9697
http://www.HealthyKidneys.org


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 11 - 30
rampage
May 9, 2012, 4:50am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
1,773
Reputation
70.00%
Reputation Score
+7 / -3
Time Online
61 days 1 hours 26 minutes
Quoted Text
Economy: Blue States Worse Than Red Under Obama

By JOHN MERLINE , INVESTOR'S BUSINESS DAILY
Posted 05/08/2012 08:02 AM ET




Barack Obama entered the national spotlight with a rousing 2004 Democratic convention speech that talked about how it was wrong "to slice and dice our country into red states and blue states." Last week he reiterated the point in a tweet to his Twitter followers, saying that "there are no red states or blue states, just the United States."

But when it comes to the economic recovery, there has been a clear difference. It turns out that blue states have done worse economically than have red states under President Obama, according to an IBD analysis of various government economic data.

IBD compared average job growth, unemployment, changes in housing prices, per capita income and GDP growth, and gas prices for the 22 states that voted for John McCain in 2008 and the 28 states that voted for Obama .

On every indicator but one, blue states have done worse, on average, than red states.

In addition, IBD looked at the economic performance of 11 states that Real Clear Politics lists as tossups for the 2012 presidential election. Many of these purple battleground states have fared far worse than the country as a whole during the past three years.

Among the findings:

Job growth: The average increase for blue states was just 1.2% from June 2009 — the official start of the economic recovery — to March 2012. For red states, it was 1.9%. The national average was 1.8%, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Unemployment: The jobless rate in March was 8.5% in blue states and 7.4% in red states, BLS data show.

Income: Blue states also did a bit worse when it came to per cap ita personal pay, rising 4.27% in 2011 compared with 4.35% in red states, according to the Bureau of Economic Analysis data

GDP: The one measure where blue states outperformed was in gross domestic product growth, clocking an average 2.5% increase from 2009 to 2010 vs. red states' 2.2%. State GDP figures for 2011 won't come out until June.

Home prices: People living in liberal areas suffered the most when it came to housing prices. Over the past year, the housing price index fell 3.5% in blue states. The index edged up by 0.03% in conservative states. Nationwide, it was down 2.4%, according to the Federal Housing Finance Agency's House Price Index. Over the past five years, housing prices in red states fell 7.5%, but by 18.5% in blue states.


More @ http://news.investors.com/article/610481/201205080802/blue-states-jobs-suffer-under-obama.htm


Reignite Rotterdam
c/o MARY L. FAHY


Kidney Wheels, (800) 999-9697
http://www.HealthyKidneys.org


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 12 - 30
CICERO
May 9, 2012, 6:04am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
18,232
Reputation
68.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -8
Time Online
702 days 15 hours 7 minutes
Blue States do poor once the government runs out of other peoples money.


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 13 - 30
Box A Rox
May 9, 2012, 6:16am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes
Of the 32 states that receive more welfare than they contribute, 27 (84%) are Red States

******************************************************************************



******************************************************************************
Teen Pregnancy:
State list with the rate per 1,000 teenage girls:

1. Mississippi – 55
2. New Mexico – 52.9
3. Arkansas – 52.5
4. Texas – 52.2
5. Oklahoma – 50.4
6. Louisiana – 47.7
7. Kentucky – 46.2
8. West Virginia – 44.8
9. Alabama – 43.6
10. Tennessee – 43.2
11. South Carolina – 42.5
12. Arizona 42.4
13. Georgia 41.4
14. Kansas 39.2
15. Wyoming 39



The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 14 - 30
3 Pages 1 2 3 » Recommend Thread
|


Thread Rating
There is currently no rating for this thread