Good idea Cic... when you look at the number of women who hold office in the two parties... you'd better stick with Monica. The GOP now has less support from women than they did in 2008. If they can't fix the GOP anti women problem, they won't stand a chance in November.
If they stray from the democrat reservation they will be called "bimbo's". To a democrat, women are respected as long as they hold political value. A women holding elected office - valuable. A women hired staffer - underpaid sex object.
Once women sign up for the other team, they are "bimbo's". Democrats play the same way with the black vote, if you switch teams, you're an "uncle tom". Liberal democrats are very passionate caring people.
If they stray from the democrat reservation they will be called "bimbo's". To a democrat, women are respected as long as they hold political value. A women holding elected office - valuable. A women hired staffer - underpaid sex object.
Once women sign up for the other team, they are "bimbo's". Democrats play the same way with the black vote, if you switch teams, you're an "uncle tom". Liberal democrats are very passionate caring people.
Cic seems to forget my main complaint about the GOP's most infamous Bimbo... Sarah Palin. I've posted several times on this board, that the GOP doesn't value their qualified Women politicians... they a choice of selecting any VP to run with John McCain... and they opted for Bimbo Palin instead of a qualified Republican women that could have helped McCain in his presidential bid.
Think about it... who is the better VP candidate??? Sarah or: ~ Condoleeza Rice ~ Elizabeth Dole ~Olympia Snowe ~Lisa Murkowski ~Christine Todd Whitman ~Meg Whitman ~Kay Bailey Hutchison
I'm sure you could think of more... all qualified and capable women... None I would call "bimbo"... but instead, McCain opted for the worst choice... the 3rd place Miss Alaska... Sarah Palin. McCain deserved to lose.
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
A confused Bill Press questioned Hilda Solis, the Secretary of Labor, about the "Lily Ledbetter Equal Pay Bill" (which the Obama Administration has been trying to hammer Mitt Romney with over the past few days). President Obama has been claiming that the bill championed equal pay for women, but Sec. Solis admitted it actually did not do anything to end the pay gap.
The only way to accurately compair it is by position, find a woman vs a man who work the same job with the same experience. Women 1) usually have less experience in a previously man dominated field for obvious reason (like politics) and 2) positions in any job have men dominated and women dominated positions, it's just a fact.
Find me somewhere in america this isn't true. It's statistics, not bias.
I don't spell check! Sorry... If you include "No offense" in a statement, chances are, your statement is offensive.
The only way to accurately compair it is by position, find a woman vs a man who work the same job with the same experience. Women 1) usually have less experience in a previously man dominated field for obvious reason (like politics) and 2) positions in any job have men dominated and women dominated positions, it's just a fact.
Find me somewhere in america this isn't true. It's statistics, not bias.
It's not statistics nor is it bias.............its pure and simple RHETORIC!!! Women have allowed themselves to become political pawns to support the political male dominated agenda. PURE RHETORIC and the sheople fall for it every single time!! The lefty crazies take a non issue and turn it into a fabricated issue!! TOO FUNNY!
When the INSANE are running the ASYLUM In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the rule. -- Friedrich Nietzsche
“How fortunate for those in power that people never think.” Adolph Hitler
Logged
