Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
SPD > More Pension Padding?
Rotterdam NY...the people's voice    Rotterdam's Virtual Internet Community    Outside Rotterdam  ›  SPD > More Pension Padding? Moderators: Admin
Users Browsing Forum
AdSense and 304 Guests

SPD > More Pension Padding?  This thread currently has 456 views. |
1 Pages 1 Recommend Thread
Admin
March 29, 2012, 4:47am Report to Moderator
Board Moderator
Posts
18,484
Reputation
64.00%
Reputation Score
+16 / -9
Time Online
769 days 23 minutes
Quoted Text
Police officials' pensions to rise
Salary bumps for assistant chiefs in Schenectady will count at retirement time

By Lauren Stanforth
Published 09:44 p.m., Wednesday, March 28, 2012

SCHENECTADY — Last year, as acting mayor, Gary McCarthy renegotiated employment agreements with the city's assistant police chiefs in the wake of a pension-padding controversy surrounding the retirement of Fire Chief Robert Farstad.

McCarthy has said he eliminated retirement payouts in favor of higher salaries to make the budget process easier and more transparent.

But the new assistant chief contracts also wind up increasing their pensions....................>>>>..............>>>>.......Read more: http://www.timesunion.com/local/article/Police-officials-pensions-to-rise-3442516.php#ixzz1qVAyNOEe
Logged
Private Message
UnadulteratedSchenectady
March 29, 2012, 6:09am Report to Moderator
We pick on Politicians. And A$$holes in General.
Baby Member
Posts
26
Reputation
66.67%
Reputation Score
+2 / -1
Time Online
1 days 4 hours 4 minutes
We wonder what Brucker's take (or pop) on Seber's push (or pull) is.

Any ideas?


Logged Offline
Site Private Message Reply: 1 - 2
mikechristine1
March 29, 2012, 2:54pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
9,074
Reputation
71.88%
Reputation Score
+23 / -9
Time Online
99 days 18 hours 36 minutes
Watch dV and his imaginery friend ham and the other imaginery friends pop in here saying that the Schdy cops and their leaders are:

--entitled to substantially more pay

--entitled to avoid living in the city (thus avoid living in the midst of burned out houses, avoid living in drug and crime infested neighborhoods)

--entitled to be provided with expensive SUV's and be allowed to take their daily pleasure drives far outside the city---all paid for by the financially struggling homeonwers

--entitled to go watch their children bowl while on the taxpayers dime

--entitled to choose to move to where propety values increase

--entitled to choose to move to where the taxes are low


.


Optimists close their eyes and pretend problems are non existent.  
Better to have open eyes, see the truths, acknowledge the negatives, and
speak up for the people rather than the politicos and their rich cronies.
Logged
Private Message Reply: 2 - 2
1 Pages 1 Recommend Thread
|


Thread Rating
There is currently no rating for this thread