Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
Why can’t everyone just live and let live?
Rotterdam NY...the people's voice    Rotterdam's Virtual Internet Community     Chit Chat About Anything  ›  Why can’t everyone just live and let live? Moderators: Admin
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 147 Guests

Why can’t everyone just live and let live?  This thread currently has 1,160 views. |
3 Pages « 1 2 3 Recommend Thread
Hamburg
February 18, 2012, 5:04pm Report to Moderator
Sr. Member
Posts
384
Reputation
11.76%
Reputation Score
+2 / -15
Time Online
4 days 5 hours 20 minutes
Those who defend Life are doing their sacred duty to protect a human life..  I second what Democratic Voice of Reason is saying - - It IS unfortunate that the hateful Right Wing is only against abortion when WHITE babies of upper class means are being aborted --- They PREFER abortion for minority children ........................


"We have to talk about liberating minds as well as liberating society."
---Angela Davis



"When you put a tiny and despised minority up for a popular vote, the minority usually loses."

---Andrew Sullivan




Logged
Private Message Reply: 30 - 37
senders
February 19, 2012, 8:48am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
29,348
Reputation
70.97%
Reputation Score
+22 / -9
Time Online
1574 days 2 hours 22 minutes
Quoted from Hamburg
Those who defend Life are doing their sacred duty to protect a human life..  I second what Democratic Voice of Reason is saying - - It IS unfortunate that the hateful Right Wing is only against abortion when WHITE babies of upper class means are being aborted --- They PREFER abortion for minority children ........................


no......safe abortion has always been 'allowed' for the WHITE upper class; keeping up the Jones/saving face/preserving blood lines etc etc.....stupid crap....minorities/poor just had to deal because
it was assumed they had 'no face'/'no god'/'no blood lines' etc etc, so why bother being an MD for them.....also remember MD's were mainly MEN.....

the cast system was such that rules/legislation/regulation was made from the view of a Stockholm Syndrome-cast system.....regardless of the religion.....

women were /are 'vessels' to carry humans to birth....like a kangaroo.....

but the upholding of life at any cost also gets you the animals like the peckerhead in GlensFalls who tossed his own procreation to the floor......


...you are a product of your environment, your environment is a product of your priorities, your priorities are a product of you......

The replacement of morality and conscience with law produces a deadly paradox.


STOP BEING GOOD DEMOCRATS---STOP BEING GOOD REPUBLICANS--START BEING GOOD AMERICANS

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 31 - 37
BuckStrider
February 19, 2012, 9:08am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
3,188
Reputation
76.47%
Reputation Score
+13 / -4
Time Online
71 days 23 hours 59 minutes
Quoted from Hamburg
Those who defend Life are doing their sacred duty to protect a human life..  I second what Democratic Voice of Reason is saying - - It IS unfortunate that the hateful Right Wing is only against abortion when WHITE babies of upper class means are being aborted --- They PREFER abortion for minority children ........................


Ha!

Look how stupid you are.

Maybe if you trace the origins you'll find out it was progressives,like yoursself,that promoted abortion to control the birth rate of 'undesireables'.....I'll let you look up the early 1900's meaning of that word.





"Approval ratings go up and down for various reasons... An example is the high post 911 support for
GWB even though he could be said to be responsible for the event." --- Box A Rox '9/11 Truther'

Melania is a bimbo... she is there to look at, not to listen to. --- Box A Rox and his 'War on Women'

Logged
Private Message Reply: 32 - 37
GrahamBonnet
February 22, 2012, 12:11pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
9,643
Reputation
66.67%
Reputation Score
+16 / -8
Time Online
131 days 7 hours 47 minutes
Here is a gang that really knows how to live and let live- the Muzzies.

http://www.khou.com/news/Two-arrested-after-disturbance-on-Continental-flight-139932593.html
[url]
27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000">                                     
[/url]


"While Foreign Terrorists were plotting to murder and maim using homemade bombs in Boston, Democrap officials in Washington DC, Albany and here were busy watching ME and other law abiding American Citizens who are gun owners and taxpayers, in an effort to blame the nation's lack of security on US so that they could have a political scapegoat."
Logged
Private Message Reply: 33 - 37
Admin
February 24, 2012, 6:06am Report to Moderator
Board Moderator
Posts
18,484
Reputation
64.00%
Reputation Score
+16 / -9
Time Online
769 days 23 minutes
Quoted Text
OK for religious beliefs to influence politics

    In his Feb. 18 letter [“Why can’t everyone just live and let live?”], Mr. George W. Putman asks what people who want to make their religious dogma the law of the land don’t understand about the constitutional separation of church and state.
    In a representative democracy, what becomes the law of the land is what popular sentiment can cause democratically elected officials to enact. There is no proscription regarding the origins or source of that popular sentiment. The only filter against dogma, religious or otherwise, becoming law is the Constitution.
    The constitutional separation of church and state was never meant to exclude religious belief from infl uencing popular sentiment. Those who interpret it that way are the ones who are trying to limit freedom.
    So, Mr. Putman, if you believe there should be no limits on abortion, the state is the best source for sex education, the historical institution of marriage should be redefined and that all the wonders of the world evolved from some primordial glop without intelligent intervention, fi ne.
    You also have the right to do all in your power to influence public sentiment to enact laws that follow your beliefs. Just don’t preclude those who disagree from participation in the public arena based upon your misguided interpretation of the constitutional separation of church and state.

    WILLIAM L. DIMAN
    Glenville

http://www.dailygazette.net/De.....r00704&AppName=1
Logged
Private Message Reply: 34 - 37
CICERO
February 24, 2012, 8:51am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
18,232
Reputation
68.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -8
Time Online
702 days 15 hours 7 minutes
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Great Letter!  Well Articulated!


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 35 - 37
Box A Rox
February 24, 2012, 9:09am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes
  "There is no position on which people are so immovable as their religious beliefs. There is no more
powerful ally one can claim in a debate than Jesus Christ, or God, or Allah, or whatever one calls
this supreme being. But like any powerful weapon, the use of God's name on one's behalf should be
used sparingly.
The religious factions that are growing throughout our land are not using their religious clout with
wisdom. They are trying to force government leaders into following their position 100 percent.
If you disagree with these religious groups on a particular moral issue, they complain, they threaten
you with a loss of money or votes or both.
I'm frankly sick and tired of the political preachers across this country telling me as a citizen that if
I want to be a moral person, I must believe in 'A,' 'B,' 'C,' and 'D.' Just who do they think they are?
And from where do they presume to claim the right to dictate their moral beliefs to me? And I am even
more angry as a legislator who must endure the threats of every religious group who thinks it has some
God-granted right to control my vote on every roll call in the Senate. I am warning them today:
I will fight them every step of the way if they try to dictate their moral convictions to all Americans
in the name of 'conservatism.' "


Barry Goldwater


The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 36 - 37
CICERO
February 24, 2012, 9:20am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
18,232
Reputation
68.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -8
Time Online
702 days 15 hours 7 minutes
Quoted Text
The religious factions that are growing throughout our land are not using their religious clout with wisdom. They are trying to force government leaders into following their position 100 percent.
If you disagree with these religious groups on a particular moral issue, they complain, they threaten
you with a loss of money or votes or both.
I'm frankly sick and tired of the political preachers across this country telling me as a citizen that if
I want to be a moral person, I must believe in 'A,' 'B,' 'C,' and 'D.' Just who do they think they are?
And from where do they presume to claim the right to dictate their moral beliefs to me? And I am even
more angry as a legislator who must endure the threats of every religious group who thinks it has some
God-granted right to control my vote on every roll call in the Senate. I am warning them today:
I will fight them every step of the way if they try to dictate their moral convictions to all Americans
in the name of 'conservatism.' "


William Dimen Agree's with Goldwater.  
You also have the right to do all in your power to influence public sentiment to enact laws that follow your beliefs. Just don’t preclude those who disagree from participation in the public arena based upon your misguided interpretation of the constitutional separation of church and state.


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 37 - 37
3 Pages « 1 2 3 Recommend Thread
|

Rotterdam NY...the people's voice    Rotterdam's Virtual Internet Community     Chit Chat About Anything  ›  Why can’t everyone just live and let live?

Thread Rating
There is currently no rating for this thread