Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
Oh, bama, Oh, Bama
Rotterdam NY...the people's voice    Rotterdam's Virtual Internet Community     Chit Chat About Anything  ›  Oh, bama, Oh, Bama Moderators: Admin
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 138 Guests

Oh, bama, Oh, Bama  This thread currently has 605 views. |
2 Pages 1 2 » Recommend Thread
IraRotterdam
October 10, 2011, 5:36am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
580
Reputation
12.50%
Reputation Score
+1 / -7
Time Online
116 days 19 hours 32 minutes
[color=purple][/color][face=Verdana][/face]Oh, Bama, Oh, Bama
Oh, Bama, Oh, Bama

I had a president, Obama was his name
Since he betrayed me I've never been the same
'Cause I love my president
Obama, where can you be?  Where can you be?

Now that you are a Marxist, I'm 'left' alone
All by myself to protest & riot
Obama, where can you be? Where can you be.

Well, Mr Prez', now that you're gone
I don't know where I'll protest
'Cause I had all my trust in you

Oh, Bama, Oh, Bama
Oh, Bama, Oh, Bama
Logged Offline
Private Message
Tommy
October 10, 2011, 3:15pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
1,660
Reputation
56.25%
Reputation Score
+9 / -7
Time Online
62 days 22 hours 29 minutes
Quoted from IraRotterdam
[color=purple][/color][face=Verdana][/face]Oh, Bama, Oh, Bama
Oh, Bama, Oh, Bama

I had a president, Obama was his name
Since he betrayed me I've never been the same
'Cause I love my president
Obama, where can you be?  Where can you be?

Now that you are a Marxist, I'm 'left' alone
All by myself to protest & riot
Obama, where can you be? Where can you be.

Well, Mr Prez', now that you're gone
I don't know where I'll protest
'Cause I had all my trust in you

Oh, Bama, Oh, Bama
Oh, Bama, Oh, Bama


Wow, just wow. I'm not calling names, just stating fact.
You are little more than an imbecile, that is being lead around by the nose.
Ever wonder why so few people respond to your posts?
It's because you are mentally deficient, and little more than a troll, that is trying to interrupt intelligent discourse.

Here is your new avatar, not that you're intelligent enough to apply it.



Just go away, you imbecilic teabagger troll.



Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 1 - 21
Box A Rox
October 20, 2011, 9:15am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes
A Tale Of Two Presidents *LINK*


~Bush and Saddam - One Trillion dollars and thousands of US lives.
~Obama and Qaddafi - One Billion dollars and zero US lives.
(And this time, the Arab world loves us as well.)

To rid the world of Osama bin Laden, Anwar al-Awlaki and Moammar Qaddafi within six months:
if Obama were a Republican, he'd be on Mount Rushmore by now.
(Andrew Sullivan/The Dish)


The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 2 - 21
55tbird
October 20, 2011, 11:17am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
3,211
Reputation
91.67%
Reputation Score
+11 / -1
Time Online
209 days 13 hours 13 minutes
Quoted from Box A Rox
A Tale Of Two Presidents *LINK*


~Bush and Saddam - One Trillion dollars and thousands of US lives.
~Obama and Qaddafi - One Billion dollars and zero US lives.
(And this time, the Arab world loves us as well.)

To rid the world of Osama bin Laden, Anwar al-Awlaki and Moammar Qaddafi within six months:
if Obama were a Republican, he'd be on Mount Rushmore by now.
(Andrew Sullivan/The Dish)

don't include Qadaffi.. That was done by Libyan rebels with assistance from NATO directed by France


"Arguing with liberals is like playing chess with a pigeon; no matter how good I am at chess, the pigeon is just going to knock out the pieces, crap on the board, and strut around like it is victorious." - Author Unknown
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 3 - 21
Tommy
October 20, 2011, 2:37pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
1,660
Reputation
56.25%
Reputation Score
+9 / -7
Time Online
62 days 22 hours 29 minutes
Quoted from 55tbird

don't include Qadaffi.. That was done by Libyan rebels with assistance from NATO directed by France


Can we call them "French Fries" again?


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 4 - 21
senders
October 20, 2011, 3:37pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
29,348
Reputation
70.97%
Reputation Score
+22 / -9
Time Online
1574 days 2 hours 22 minutes
Quoted from Tommy


Can we call them "French Fries" again?


I never stopped calling them French Fries....it was too much fun masticating them


...you are a product of your environment, your environment is a product of your priorities, your priorities are a product of you......

The replacement of morality and conscience with law produces a deadly paradox.


STOP BEING GOOD DEMOCRATS---STOP BEING GOOD REPUBLICANS--START BEING GOOD AMERICANS

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 5 - 21
Box A Rox
October 21, 2011, 6:58am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes
"Without putting a single U.S. service member on the ground, we achieved our objectives, and our NATO mission will soon come
to an end.
We've demonstrated what collective action can achieve in the 21st century."
(President Obama in a Rose Garden address on Libya.)


The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 6 - 21
senders
October 21, 2011, 7:19pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
29,348
Reputation
70.97%
Reputation Score
+22 / -9
Time Online
1574 days 2 hours 22 minutes
who really cares.....this rhetoric is REPEATED OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER......throughout history......but every generation that is further from the 'action' and timeframe loses it's truth....war SUCKS....but we are who we are....

and that's millenia truth

I'd still kill you for the last apple; as you would me

check the mirror......

choices by age dont count....because that is a constant also......


...you are a product of your environment, your environment is a product of your priorities, your priorities are a product of you......

The replacement of morality and conscience with law produces a deadly paradox.


STOP BEING GOOD DEMOCRATS---STOP BEING GOOD REPUBLICANS--START BEING GOOD AMERICANS

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 7 - 21
Patches
October 21, 2011, 7:27pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
4,839
Reputation
63.16%
Reputation Score
+12 / -7
Time Online
40 days 11 hours 18 minutes
nice re=election move

TROOPS COMING HOME FROM IRAQ BY DEC 31ST////

God bless America and all it's service men and women

now what else will he do????
Logged
Private Message Reply: 8 - 21
Box A Rox
October 31, 2011, 6:09am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes
There are some on this board who were FOR invading Iraq...
they claimed that Iraq had Chemical WMD's... They didn't.

But

The same people were against any military support for Libya... a country that actually HAS Chemical WMD's...
The new govt of Libya wants nothing to do with WMD'S and will turn them over to the UN for disposal.

God Bless Barack Hussein Obama!


The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 9 - 21
MobileTerminal
October 31, 2011, 6:34am Report to Moderator
Guest User
Quoted from Box A Rox
There are some on this board who were FOR invading Iraq...
they claimed that Iraq had Chemical WMD's... They didn't.




"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
  President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998.

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
  President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998.

"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."  
  Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998.


"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
  Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
  Letter to President Clinton, signed by Sens. Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John
Kerry, and others Oct. 9, 1998.

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."

  Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998.

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."

Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999.

"There is no doubt that . Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies."
  Letter to President Bush, Signed by Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL,) and others,
Dec, 5, 2001.


"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them."
  Sen. Carl Levin (d, MI), Sept. 19, 2002.

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
  Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002.

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."
  Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002.


"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seing and developing weapons of mass destruction."
  Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002.

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
  Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002.

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force — if necessary — to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."

  Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002.

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years . We also should remember we have alway s underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
  Sen. Jay Rockerfeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002,

"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do."
  Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002.


"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program.
He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
  Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass
destruction. "[W]ithout question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation. And now he has continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real ...
  Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003.



http://www.snopes.com/politics/war/wmdquotes.asp
Logged
E-mail Reply: 10 - 21
CICERO
October 31, 2011, 6:40am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
18,232
Reputation
68.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -8
Time Online
702 days 15 hours 7 minutes
MT, they were all trick by the masterminds of GWB and Dick Cheany.  Box once quoted General Smedley Butler that war is almost always a profiteering racket.  I guess the "almost" excludes when Democrats initiate the wars.


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 11 - 21
Shadow
October 31, 2011, 6:46am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
11,107
Reputation
70.83%
Reputation Score
+17 / -7
Time Online
448 days 17 minutes
Yes it must have been the GWB Jedi mind trick.
Logged
Private Message Reply: 12 - 21
Box A Rox
October 31, 2011, 6:49am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes
Great Information MT.  Some of those reports shows you the extent of the deception of the Bush/Cheney Administration in deceiving the American public and even the Congress.

Of course Saddam DID have WMD'S... We know for sure that Saddam DID have WMD'S because Reagan/Rumsfeld gave them to him for his war against Iran.
See pic:


But as we all know, after the First Gulf War with Daddy Bush, Saddam got rid of his WMD'S... Just ask the UN weapons
inspectors who testified to that fact.

The Bush/Cheney "WMD Lies" evidence, will go down in history as part of the George Worst Bush, Worst President in US History
saga.

[img][/img]


The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 13 - 21
Shadow
October 31, 2011, 6:56am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
11,107
Reputation
70.83%
Reputation Score
+17 / -7
Time Online
448 days 17 minutes
I never realized that GWB/Cheney had such control over all the Dems in Congress.
Logged
Private Message Reply: 14 - 21
2 Pages 1 2 » Recommend Thread
|


Thread Rating
There is currently no rating for this thread