|
MobileTerminal |
February 24, 2012, 9:36am |
|
Guest User |
It's out of your hands now Rhonda - no reason to speak to you about this at all. |
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|
Patches |
February 24, 2012, 9:38am |
|
Hero Member
Posts
4,839
Reputation
63.16%
Reputation Score
+12 / -7
Time Online
40 days 11 hours 18 minutes
|
Reasoning.........we need business not just for Rotterdam residents....but business that will
bring revenue from other areas nearby.....more other area traffic will realize more revenue...not
more traffic and more headaches.....
doesn't make sense to have Drug Stores within walking distance of one another....
Build at the west end of Town.....will draw from all areas.......
Conclusion: a retail business that will not invade the neighborhood and quality of life....
THINK THINK THINK....
|
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|
joebxr |
February 24, 2012, 9:44am |
|
Hero Member
Posts
6,667
Reputation
70.00%
Reputation Score
+14 / -6
Time Online
276 days 6 hours 18 minutes
|
WHY WON'T YOU ANSWER THIS? WHY DO YOU RUN AWAY FROM ANSWERING A LEGITIMATE QUESTION ABOUT YOUR COMMENT?
“The thing that concerns me is that the opposition seems to be … isn’t that they are objecting it to being a retail business, but they are objecting to it being a CVS,” Severson said.
Ron, answer this one question....how could you and why would you make this comment. What information did you have that the residents were basically oppossed because it was CVS? Wasn't this disrespectful to the residents and other board members of whom none felt this way...and hurtful enough to the residents that they felt compelled to speak up and say "NO" when you made the comment.
|
| JUST BECAUSE SISSY SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO...BUT HE THINKS IT DOES!!!!! JUST BECAUSE MC1 SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO!!!!! |
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|
DemocraticVoiceOfReason |
February 24, 2012, 9:55am |
|
Hero Member
Posts
12,321
Reputation
20.83%
Reputation Score
+10 / -38
Time Online
151 days 7 hours 5 minutes
|
WHY WON'T YOU ANSWER THIS? WHY DO YOU RUN AWAY FROM ANSWERING A LEGITIMATE QUESTION ABOUT YOUR COMMENT?
If you are a town resident and you have a question to ask me ---- call town hall, leave your name and number .. and I will make arrangements to meet you. |
| George Amedore & Christian Klueg for NYS Senate 2016 Pete Vroman for State Assembly 2016[/size][/color] "For this is what America is all about. It is the uncrossed desert and the unclimbed ridge. It is the star that is not reached and the harvest that is sleeping in the unplowed ground." Lyndon Baines Johnson |
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|
joebxr |
February 24, 2012, 10:46am |
|
Hero Member
Posts
6,667
Reputation
70.00%
Reputation Score
+14 / -6
Time Online
276 days 6 hours 18 minutes
|
If you are a town resident and you have a question to ask me ---- call town hall, leave your name and number .. and I will make arrangements to meet you.
Yes, I know...you get to pick and choose what it is you want to post on this forum especially when it's pointed out that you act independantly and make remarks to others that are uncalled for. Have a nice day...be sure to look in the audience at next planning meeting/town board meeting...you might find some new and different faces sitting there that might ask some very pointed questions and provide some documented information for the planning commision and TB to consider!!!! |
| JUST BECAUSE SISSY SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO...BUT HE THINKS IT DOES!!!!! JUST BECAUSE MC1 SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO!!!!! |
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|
joebxr |
February 24, 2012, 11:23am |
|
Hero Member
Posts
6,667
Reputation
70.00%
Reputation Score
+14 / -6
Time Online
276 days 6 hours 18 minutes
|
I don't usually respond to hamburg/dvor's posts, and usually don't even read them. But since I had to follow the train of posting here.....I personally found no issue with dvor's vote in favor of the cvs. It was dvor's independent vote. That is what dvor is there for....yes?
HOWEVER...........I do take issue with the fact that dvor labels everyone on this forum who was not in favor of this cvs project 'as proposed'....a NAYBOOB!!! So we can assume that dvor considers 'all' those on the planning board who voted 'no' also NAYBOOBS.....yes?
The planning board had the same concerns as most of those who questioned this development from the start. You can't have it both ways.
"That is what dvor is there for....yes?" Not sure I see it that way. He is on a planning committee that is suppossed to make decisions that are in the best interest of the community and the residents of that community. To do that one has to be impartial, listen to all points and provide a vote that is independant of of their personal belief. I don't think that can be said of what was done here! How could he be the sole person that heard things different than 6 other members? |
| JUST BECAUSE SISSY SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO...BUT HE THINKS IT DOES!!!!! JUST BECAUSE MC1 SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO!!!!! |
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|
rampage |
February 24, 2012, 11:28am |
|
Hero Member
Posts
1,773
Reputation
70.00%
Reputation Score
+7 / -3
Time Online
61 days 1 hours 26 minutes
|
The fact is that the "nayboobs" like Joeboxr and Rampage would have found some reason to attack my vote even if I had voted the way they wanted. They have proven this on numerous occasions on this website when they have insulted and attacked me EVEN WHEN I AGREED WITH THEM.
Actually, the fact of the matter is that if you had listened to what was overwhelming evidence that it was not a good idea to have this at the 4 Corners, as was stated by the residents who were concerned for their way of life and that of their families and changed from being a stick in the mud, then I would have actually given you credit. The fact of the matter is you stuck to your guns, probably due to the fact that you didn't want to look like a fool solely on this little corner of the web, and in that, in real life, you look more rediculous. You could have actually looked like you had some common sense, but you didn't. Start using some common sense and paying attention to what's actually going on and maybe you'll figure it out and see that opinions can change. I have opinions that have changed over time, and I will admit to being wrong. Can you? Show us proof. Either show you have a brain and can use it, or show us that your appointment to this board was solely a political favor in both directions, giving you power, and showing that you'll hand it right back to those that put you in the position by not making a decision on your own. You're supposed to be doing what is good for the RESIDENTS and for the town by listening to facts. Do your job. By the way, figure out what type of government we live under yet? I want to have respect. Just show me something worthy of it. So far, you have shown absolutely 0. |
| |
|
|
|
|
senders |
February 25, 2012, 10:20am |
|
Hero Member
Posts
29,348
Reputation
70.97%
Reputation Score
+22 / -9
Time Online
1574 days 2 hours 22 minutes
|
senders, what the heck is patina?
Quoted Text
1 a: a usually green film formed naturally on copper and bronze by long exposure or artificially (as by acids) and often valued aesthetically for its color b: a surface appearance of something grown beautiful especially with age or use 2 : an appearance or aura that is derived from association, habit, or established character this is what I am mostly referring to....... 3 : a superficial covering or exterior See patina defined for English-language learners » Examples of PATINA
Origin of PATINA
Italian, from Latin, shallow dish — more at paten First Known Use: 1748
Related to PATINA
Synonyms: air, ambience (or ambiance), aroma, atmosphere, climate, flavor, halo, karma, mood, nimbus, note, odor, aura, smell, temper, vibration(s)
[+]more
|
| ...you are a product of your environment, your environment is a product of your priorities, your priorities are a product of you......
The replacement of morality and conscience with law produces a deadly paradox.
STOP BEING GOOD DEMOCRATS---STOP BEING GOOD REPUBLICANS--START BEING GOOD AMERICANS
|
|
|
|
|
GrahamBonnet |
February 25, 2012, 12:39pm |
|
Hero Member
Posts
9,643
Reputation
66.67%
Reputation Score
+16 / -8
Time Online
131 days 7 hours 47 minutes
|
The lay definition in this manner is that Patina is an acquired look that takes time to develop on an antique or other valuable item. On an old piece of furniture, the finish may become crinkled and pretty. On an antique car, the leather seats may crackle and the paint may have dullness in areas. But the original beauty still looks amazing.
On a building for instance- the copper snowslides might turn green. The red cedar shakes might blacken, and the bronze lanterns might darken from exposure to elements. All desirable and acquired architectural features that are not FOUND ON vinyl or fake stucco coated structures made from pink cement blocks or cheaply built facades. When you visit an old seaside village or a small town in the midwest you might see a commercial strip made up of wooden sided building with many coats of paint that are finely maintained depending on the pride level. Senders is bemoaning the lack of taste in the way the new structures are designed and slapped together with no coherence or cohesive element which unifies them. I concur. Rotterdam is one example where there is NO sense architectural theme or guidance and NO sense of anything but hodgepodge and helter skelter. There is a feeling of false "class" that defines the Italianate revival structures as well. Often I recognize that the profession of architect has become filled with nitwits and blind people. Take a drive down Altamont Avenue and tell me otherwise. The town is filled with flotsam and jetsam too. |
| "While Foreign Terrorists were plotting to murder and maim using homemade bombs in Boston, Democrap officials in Washington DC, Albany and here were busy watching ME and other law abiding American Citizens who are gun owners and taxpayers, in an effort to blame the nation's lack of security on US so that they could have a political scapegoat." |
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|
Patches |
February 25, 2012, 2:31pm |
|
Hero Member
Posts
4,839
Reputation
63.16%
Reputation Score
+12 / -7
Time Online
40 days 11 hours 18 minutes
|
well explained....well said......
|
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|
Stringer |
February 26, 2012, 10:59am |
|
Baby Member
Posts
33
Time Online
12 days 14 hours 31 minutes
|
Thank you both for the info. |
|
|
|
|
littlesal |
February 26, 2012, 11:11am |
|
Hero Member
Posts
842
Reputation
66.67%
Reputation Score
+4 / -2
Time Online
232 days 18 hours 19 minutes
|
The lay definition in this manner is that Patina is an acquired look that takes time to develop on an antique or other valuable item. On an old piece of furniture, the finish may become crinkled and pretty. On an antique car, the leather seats may crackle and the paint may have dullness in areas. But the original beauty still looks amazing.
On a building for instance- the copper snowslides might turn green. The red cedar shakes might blacken, and the bronze lanterns might darken from exposure to elements. All desirable and acquired architectural features that are not FOUND ON vinyl or fake stucco coated structures made from pink cement blocks or cheaply built facades. When you visit an old seaside village or a small town in the midwest you might see a commercial strip made up of wooden sided building with many coats of paint that are finely maintained depending on the pride level. Senders is bemoaning the lack of taste in the way the new structures are designed and slapped together with no coherence or cohesive element which unifies them. I concur. Rotterdam is one example where there is NO sense architectural theme or guidance and NO sense of anything but hodgepodge and helter skelter. There is a feeling of false "class" that defines the Italianate revival structures as well. Often I recognize that the profession of architect has become filled with nitwits and blind people. Take a drive down Altamont Avenue and tell me otherwise. The town is filled with flotsam and jetsam too.
You mean that crap that is already crumbling off of the DSS building? Anybody notice the extremely cheap construction of those dorms by armory? Tell me those are built to last? |
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|
alias |
February 26, 2012, 11:16am |
|
Guest User |
You mean that crap that is already crumbling off of the DSS building?
Anybody notice the extremely cheap construction of those dorms by armory? Tell me those are built to last?
Quoted Text
Planned obsolescence or built-in obsolescence[1] in industrial design is a policy of planning or designing a product with a limited useful life, so it will become obsolete, that is, unfashionable or no longer functional after a certain period of time.[1] Planned obsolescence has potential benefits for a producer because to obtain continuing use of the product the consumer is under pressure to purchase again, whether from the same manufacturer (a replacement part or a newer model), or from a competitor which might also rely on planned obsolescence.[1] The practice of planned obsolescence has potential benefits for the consumer as well since it attempts to take into account the fact of high pace of change in modern society: new technological developments make earlier technological solutions rapidly obsolete, and new design fashions make earlier fashions look speedily out of date.
In some cases, deliberate deprecation of earlier versions of a technology is used to reduce ongoing support costs, especially in the software industry. Though this could be considered planned obselescence, it differs from the classic form in that the consumer is typically made aware of the limited support lifetime of the product as part of their licensing agreement.
For an industry, planned obsolescence stimulates demand by encouraging purchasers to buy sooner if they still want a functioning product. Built-in obsolescence is used in many different products. There is, however, the potential backlash of consumers who learn that the manufacturer invested money to make the product obsolete faster; such consumers might turn to a producer (if any exists) that offers a more durable alternative.
Estimates of planned obsolescence can influence a company's decisions about product engineering. Therefore the company can use the least expensive components that satisfy product lifetime projections. Such decisions are part of a broader discipline known as value engineering.
|
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|
GrahamBonnet |
February 26, 2012, 1:51pm |
|
Hero Member
Posts
9,643
Reputation
66.67%
Reputation Score
+16 / -8
Time Online
131 days 7 hours 47 minutes
|
Similar to the cars of the 70's that were made to last for 3 years. |
| "While Foreign Terrorists were plotting to murder and maim using homemade bombs in Boston, Democrap officials in Washington DC, Albany and here were busy watching ME and other law abiding American Citizens who are gun owners and taxpayers, in an effort to blame the nation's lack of security on US so that they could have a political scapegoat." |
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|
DemocraticVoiceOfReason |
February 26, 2012, 2:02pm |
|
Hero Member
Posts
12,321
Reputation
20.83%
Reputation Score
+10 / -38
Time Online
151 days 7 hours 5 minutes
|
Actually, the fact of the matter is that if you had listened to what was overwhelming evidence that it was not a good idea to have this at the 4 Corners, as was stated by the residents who were concerned for their way of life and that of their families and changed from being a stick in the mud, then I would have actually given you credit. The fact of the matter is you stuck to your guns, probably due to the fact that you didn't want to look like a fool solely on this little corner of the web, and in that, in real life, you look more rediculous. You could have actually looked like you had some common sense, but you didn't.
Start using some common sense and paying attention to what's actually going on and maybe you'll figure it out and see that opinions can change. I have opinions that have changed over time, and I will admit to being wrong. Can you?
Show us proof. Either show you have a brain and can use it, or show us that your appointment to this board was solely a political favor in both directions, giving you power, and showing that you'll hand it right back to those that put you in the position by not making a decision on your own. You're supposed to be doing what is good for the RESIDENTS and for the town by listening to facts. Do your job.
By the way, figure out what type of government we live under yet?
I want to have respect. Just show me something worthy of it. So far, you have shown absolutely 0.
First -- I am convinced that no matter how I had voted on the issue .. you and your cohorts would still have found some fault in that and some reason to continue your personal attacks and threats and attempts at blackmail and intimidation. Second - I did listen to ALL of the residents (those opposed to and those in favor of the proposal) and review ALL of the information (that which opposed and that which favored the proposal) -- then I MADE MY OWN DECISION based on that. Furthermore - there is absolutely NO TRUTH that I was told how to vote and the proof of that is a) I had NO COMMUNICATIONS with anyone who appointed me telling, asking or suggesting how I should vote on that issue or any other issue and b) it would have been a whole lot easier for me to just vote the "easy way out" -- the path of least resistance. The fact is that I believe that the applicant had made a good faith effort to present a conceptual plan that met/addressed the concerns of the immediate neighbors AND I believe that the immediate neighbors were very clear that they did not object to "some other retail use" of the properties AND that recommending rezoning the properties to retail business was in the best interests of ALL of the taxpayers in the town AND that it was the right decision for the future growth of my town. Third - I do NOT regret my decision nor do I believe it was wrong. And I fully respect the decision reached by others who voted the other way. You and your cohorts will just have to grow up and realize that in a free society other people can an and will disagree with you. Fourth - I have every intention of serving out my entire term. No amount of threats, personal attacks and attempts to blackmail or intimidate me will cause me to leave even one day short of that term. |
| George Amedore & Christian Klueg for NYS Senate 2016 Pete Vroman for State Assembly 2016[/size][/color] "For this is what America is all about. It is the uncrossed desert and the unclimbed ridge. It is the star that is not reached and the harvest that is sleeping in the unplowed ground." Lyndon Baines Johnson |
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|