[/color]Bill Mahr's (HBO) nasty, vulgar 'humor' was discussed on FOX Tuesday evening. Essentially the lack of feed back from NOW & 'liberal' women was discussed.
M Backman & S Palin were verbally raped.
Mahr is a comedian so he has license to say anything he wishes. No restraints. There is plenty of material Mahr could use to have humor at Palin & Backman's expense. Moose for Palin & Backman a tax attorney who cannot count, that might be funny.
The EXCUSES being made by lefty women is similar to EXCUSES made for Stalin by American communist in the 1930's. Millions were being killed, it was necessary growing pains. Dead Russians, Ukrainians (in the millions) was necessary.
Put simply, the left has no moral compass. They sold their souls to the devil. Stalin was a greater evil than Hitler. Mahr is far more abrasive than Imas, a man I do not find entertaining.
Anyone with a soul who entertains dialog with a hardcore lefty is 'casting pearls to swine'. You will get a grunt.
The put down strategy of the lefty works, the viewers have not caught on to the tactic. If it sounds funny it must be OK. Laugh all the way to hell.
Why anyone on FOX entertains a lefty is beyond me. Fair & balanced is bullshit. This is a war beyond ideology.[color=red]
Female candidates do get attacked for being female. Evidently some feel if you don't like their "policies" it is okay to belittle them for what they are, rather than what they say and do. Even the same people who attack every critic of Obama as racist don't seem to get this.
Female candidates do get attacked for being female. Evidently some feel if you don't like their "policies" it is okay to belittle them for what they are, rather than what they say and do..
For sure! I remember so much of this that was aimed at Geraldine Ferraro when she ran, and the ongoing Nancy Pelosi attacks. Sexism is alive and well in America!
It's a shame that with so many good qualified capable and knowledgeable Republican women that could run for office, the GOP seems stuck in women who are just a female version of GWB. Not that bright... not that capable.
Instead of the Bachmann/Palin mold, why not try someone both qualified and knowledgeable: Senators: Lisa Murkowski, Olympia Snowe, Maine; Susan Collins, Maine; Elizabeth Dole North Carolina; Kay Bailey Hutchison, Texas Or: Governors: Oline Walker, Utah; Linda Lingle, Hawaii, M. Jodi Rell, Connecticut Or: Members of the House: Ileana Ros-Lehtinen; Deborah Pryce, Barbara Cubin, Sue Myrick Jo Ann Emerson, ; Kay Granger, Mary Bono, Heather Wilson , ; Judith Borg Biggert , Shelley Moore Capito, Marsha Blackburn, Ginny Brown-Waite, Candice Miller, ; Marilyn Musgrave, Thelma Drake, Virginia Foxx, Cathy McMorris Rodgers, Jean Schmidt... Or: Condoleezza Rice, Secretary of State; Elaine Chao, Secretary of Labor; Margaret Spellings, Secretary of Education; Mary Peters, Secretary of Transportation; Susan Schwab, US Special Trade Representative
Bimbo's Bachmann/Palin are an embarrassment to women everywhere. With so many to choose from, why opt for 'good looking' instead of 'qualified & electable'?
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
Bimbo's Bachmann/Palin are an embarrassment to women everywhere. With so many to choose from, why opt for 'good looking' instead of 'qualified & electable'?
Sexism alive and well!!!
This is fun, when you disagree with somebody politically, you can drop an "ism" to silence any real debate. Thanks box.
So does your technique work both ways? If I disagree with Obama's policies, and I want to prevent being called racist, all I have to do is use a racially derogatory word to describe Obama, THEN, in the same post, name other black people that I agree with politically? It's sort of like cancelling out the first racist comment by following it up with a comment patronizing other black people.
That is an AWSOME technique Box. I'm gonna use that one.
Yes I knew you would like just about every RINO in Congress and not one conservative in the group.
They certainly aren't women that I'd likely vote for, but unlike the Bachmann/Palin duo, these women are intelligent, qualified and electable.
My list is just a short scan of Republican women who could be on the ticket, I'm sure Conservatives could find some women that are capable, intelligent and electable... so why don't they??? When Conservatives look for fresh faces to run for office, they fail terribly (both are attractive women... is that their only criteria?)
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
You just don't like their politics Box because they're not liberals. After listening to some of Pelosi's remarks in the last couple of years I'm not sure she's playing with a full deck.
After listening to some of Pelosi's remarks in the last couple of years I'm not sure she's playing with a full deck.
Quoted from Madam X "Female candidates do get attacked for being female. Evidently some feel if you don't like their "policies" it is okay to belittle them for what they are, rather than what they say and do."
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
Speaker Nancy Pelosi at the health summit: "It's about jobs. In it's life, it [the health bill] will create 4 million jobs -- 400,000 jobs almost immediately."
But, obviously some in her own district don't like Obamacare
Nancy Pelosi's San Francisco district was the hands-down winner in the latest set of health care law waivers announced by the Obama administration.
More than three dozen businesses with locations in Pelosi's district were granted temporary exemptions from the law in April, according to information released by the Department of Health and Human Services. The businesses -- mostly restaurants and cafes, with a few upscale hotels and clubs mixed in -- accounted for about 20 percent of all waivers granted last month.
"Arguing with liberals is like playing chess with a pigeon; no matter how good I am at chess, the pigeon is just going to knock out the pieces, crap on the board, and strut around like it is victorious." - Author Unknown
Pelosi quote"we have to pass the bill so we can find out what's in it" and that was on the largest bill ever passed by Congress and none of our elected officials had a clue what was in the bill, brilliant.
This is fun, when you disagree with somebody politically, you can drop an "ism" to silence any real debate. Thanks box.
So does your technique work both ways? If I disagree with Obama's policies, and I want to prevent being called racist, all I have to do is use a racially derogatory word to describe Obama, THEN, in the same post, name other black people that I agree with politically? It's sort of like cancelling out the first racist comment by following it up with a comment patronizing other black people.
That is an AWSOME technique Box. I'm gonna use that one.
Please don't use that one. I still respect you, and it's not even the morning, so just don't.
Please don't use that one. I still respect you, and it's not even the morning, so just don't.
Explain?
You would have to follow prior posts between box and myself.
When box alludes to any opposition of Obama as being racist in an effort to defend him, I will use the equally ridiculous argument to defend female republicans. Of course I could care less either way; this is just for the sake of argument. So when Box uses a derogatory word like BIMBO to describe the female republican candidates he disagrees with, I like to point out how in the game of using "ism", if I or anybody else used a derogatory word for a black person to describe Obama, how the selective outrage would come from people like box or Smoking B's calling that person a racist.
I just like to point out the blatant liberal hypocrisy posted by box. He uses a derogatory word like Bimbo to describe women while calling people racist that oppose Obama's policies.
Bimbo's Bachmann/Palin are an embarrassment to women everywhere. With so many to choose from, why opt for 'good looking' instead of 'qualified & electable'?
N-word Obama is an embarrassment to African Americans everywhere. With so many to choose from, why opt for the 'light skinned' instead of 'qualified & electable'
So when Box uses a derogatory word like BIMBO to describe the female republican candidates he disagrees with... I just like to point out the blatant liberal hypocrisy posted by box. He uses a derogatory word like Bimbo to describe women while calling people racist that oppose Obama's policies.
I named 40 or 50 female Republican Candidates, and I disagree with most of them on most issues... The only ones I referred to as "BIMBOS"... Were the BIMBOS!
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
Remember John Edwards? Evidently he was considered more "qualified and electable" than all the others who could have been picked for VP. No one pointed out how stupid and unqualified (and bimbo-ish) he was, at the time, and he turned out to be way stupider than anyone could ever imagine.I heard more questioning of Hilary's qualifications than Barack's. Maybe I'm just more sensitive to it, but it really seemed that way to me. Mitt Romney is someone who seems to benefit from having the right "look", as far as that goes. If he were female or a non-telegenic man, I think someone who has changed his mind so many times about just what it is he stands for would not be taken seriously at this point. I'm just sayin'.
Logged
