I don't think employees of not-for-profits should be allowed to sit on government bodies that fund them, if that is indeed legal now. There is a new interest in these type of arrangements because the political class and the connected have been known to use them to keep each other in high-paying jobs
that they would never have in a competitive market.
I agree, when you get donations and tax breaks the public has an interest in how you keep the books, or maybe you don't keep books at all which seems to be the case here. Don't they employ anyone who knows how to count money?

Quoted from Madam X

I don't think employees of not-for-profits should be allowed to sit on government bodies that fund them, if that is indeed legal now. There is a new interest in these type of arrangements because the political class and the connected have been known to use them to keep each other in high-paying jobs
that they would never have in a competitive market.
I agree, when you get donations and tax breaks the public has an interest in how you keep the books, or maybe you don't keep books at all which seems to be the case here. Don't they employ anyone who knows how to count money?

Then don't vote for Leesa! How about a non profit Key Hall hosting a political fund raiser? Then they keep their non profit educational status.

Sorry, this popped back up, as did a bunch of old topics on my unread list.  Just wondering.  Did they figure out who did it yet, or how much was taken?