If Paul believes, as he professes, that life begins at conception... how can he preform abortions??? Paul admits that he would give a rape victim a shot of estrogen to abort the pregnancy... IS A Chemical ABORTION!
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
If Paul believes, as he professes, that life begins at conception... how can he preform abortions??? Paul admits that he would give a rape victim a shot of estrogen to abort the pregnancy... IS A Chemical ABORTION!
If you listen to his answer, he says if a woman goes to the emergency room after being forcefully raped, the shot of estrogen would force an abortion of the egg without knowing if the egg was ever fertilized.
What I took away from that interview is Ron Paul recognizes the very difficult decision in the case of rape of possibly terminating a life; it is the modern day abortion on demand that is done for convenience WELL AFTER conception and into the second and third trimesters that he takes issue with. At that stage of pregnancy, there is no mistaking it is a human life that is being terminated.
Ron Paul doesn't think an abortion is the removal of a "clump of cells" like some of the maniacs that have abortion lust.
Ron Paul recognizes the very difficult decision in the case of rape of possibly terminating a life; it is the modern day abortion on demand that is done for convenience WELL AFTER conception and into the second and third trimesters that he takes issue with.
You don't mention FIRST TRIMESTER ABORTION (the one that Paul would willingly preformed in the video)... Is a FIRST TRIMESTER ABORTION acceptable to Ron Paul? Or just Rape Victims First Trimester Abortions?
Is it just rape victims that Paul would willingly preform abortions on as stated in his video? What about incest? What about consensual sex between minors??? Would Paul also preform abortions in those cases?
By Cicero's own definition of life... THAT WOULD BE MURDER!!! CICERO WANTS US ALL TO VOTE FOR A MURDERER FOR US PRESIDENT!
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
Is it just rape victims that Paul would willingly preform abortions on as stated in his video? What about incest?
Did you watch the full clip? Or just the Think Progress edited clip? He stated he would give an estrogen injection without knowing if the rape victim was pregnant. It was even clear in the Think Progress clip. He didn't say he would perform a pregnancy test to determine if the rape victim was pregnant THEN inject them with estrogen. It would be injected without knowing if the rape victim was even impregnanted.
C'mon Box, you still watching the Think Progress propaganda?
Paul's words in both videos: "Life Does Begin At Conception" Paul's words in both videos: "I would give them a shot of estrogen". (with the intent on ending the pregnancy)
In the case cited in both the video that I posted and in the video that you posted... PAUL WOULD PREFORM A CHEMICAL ABORTION.
You have posted many times that you consider that admission to be MURDER!
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
Did you watch the full clip? Or just the Think Progress edited clip? He stated he would give an estrogen injection without knowing if the rape victim was pregnant. It was even clear in the Think Progress clip. He didn't say he would perform a pregnancy test to determine if the rape victim was pregnant THEN inject them with estrogen. It would be injected without knowing if the rape victim was even impregnanted.
C'mon Box, you still watching the Think Progress propaganda?
Then lets use YOUR video, not mine. In both cases Ron Paul admits that he would administer a chemical abortion, with the intent on KILLING A BABY! ( as you would word it)
By your criteria, Ron Paul could do preform 10 abortions a day if he never asked if the woman was pregnant. Of course there is NO REASON TO GIVE THE ESTROGEN SHOT, UNLESS SHE IS PREGNANT, or MAY BE PREGNANT, in which case Paul will terminate the pregnancy... or as you usually word it RON PAUL WOULD MURDER THAT WOMAN'S BABY!
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
"I would give them a shot of estrogen". *(with the intent on ending the pregnancy)
*Box added for effect - Not Ron Paul's words.
Paul clearly states, that 1 hour or 1 day after intercouse there is no chemical, medical or legal evidence of pregnanacy. The intent of the estrogen shot is preventing a pregnancy.
Box, watch the last minute of the FULL CLIP. There is a reason Think Progress left that part out. They don't want people to know doctors make money aborting a baby one minute before birth. He destroys the "it's my body" argument.
Paul clearly states, that 1 hour or 1 day after intercouse there is no chemical, medical or legal evidence of pregnanacy. The intent of the estrogen shot is preventing a pregnancy.
Box, watch the last minute of the FULL CLIP. There is a reason Think Progress left that part out. They don't want people to know doctors make money aborting a baby one minute before birth. He destroys the "it's my body" argument.
Yes I added the part in parenthesis... that's why there is no quotes around it, only Ron Paul's words... DUHHHH!
Paul would end the BABY'S life if he gave a raped woman estrogen. The woman may or may not be pregnant, but that isn't Paul's concern. His concern is ending her pregnancy. What Ron Paul is doing with Estrogen in an ER, women can do today by using Plan B. Why doesn't Ron Paul advise these raped women to use Plan B instead of the much more expensive treatment in an ER of a hospital??? BECAUSE RON PAUL (besides being a fringe presidential candidate) IS A DOCTOR... and like his fellow doctors who preform other types of abortion... RON PAUL WOULD MAKE A LOT OF MONEY BILLING FOR THESE ESTROGEN SHOTS.
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
Paul would end the BABY'S life if he gave a raped woman estrogen. The woman may or may not be pregnant, but that isn't Paul's concern. His concern is ending her pregnancy.
You keep on talking about Ron Paul's "concern" then continue to state something he never said. Why? He said there is no chemical or medical proof of pregnancy one day after intercourse. Why do you continue to use the words "end a pregnancy" when the estrogen shot would prevent a pregnancy?
You speak to Paul's concerns, then you interpret something that isn't there. He clearly said he would inject the rape victim with estrogen while there is no chemical or medical proof of pregnancy.
The male sperm unites with a female's egg from within an hours to several days. Since both a few hours, to several days would qualify for a rape victim to seek help at an ER for a rape kit and Paul didn't set any time limit on this procedure... a few days, a few weeks, a month... Paul knows that by administering estrogen to a woman who may be pregnant would cause an abortion. Paul's excuse... She may or may not be pregnant, is similar to Paul shooting a rifle through a closed door... he may or may not kill anyone behind the door... but if there is a pregnant woman, or someone behind the door, he will take a life.
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
The male sperm unites with a female's egg from within an hours to several days. Since both a few hours, to several days would qualify for a rape victim to seek help at an ER for a rape kit and Paul didn't set any time limit on this procedure... a few days, a few weeks, a month... Paul knows that by administering estrogen to a woman who may be pregnant would cause an abortion. Paul's excuse... She may or may not be pregnant, is similar to Paul shooting a rifle through a closed door... he may or may not kill anyone behind the door... but if there is a pregnant woman, or someone behind the door, he will take a life.
Box, you were just claiming about a month ago that Ron Paul was going to overturn Row V Wade and end abortion in America. Now he is card carrying member of N.O.W. and a Planned Parenthood board member. Make up your mind box...Is Paul now Pro Choice? Do you support him now?
Box, you were just claiming about a month ago that Ron Paul was going to overturn Row V Wade and end abortion in America. Now he is card carrying member of N.O.W. and a Planned Parenthood board member. Make up your mind box...Is Paul now Pro Choice? Do you support him now?
Nothing has changed... Ron Paul still wants BIG GOVERNMENT to control a woman's choice. He promotes "freedom" for his Republican agenda, not for the American people.
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
When the INSANE are running the ASYLUM In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the rule. -- Friedrich Nietzsche
“How fortunate for those in power that people never think.” Adolph Hitler
Logged
