DV has ceased responding to questions challenging him to prove that Schenectady improve. He avoids any comment on all the rampant crime, the higher taxes in the proposed budget, and the dramatic loss of life saving services by the city.
Instead he keeps using throwing these comments out about regressives, etc. etc.
Well, tell us DV, tell us which of the following is a better choice:
Choice #1: Regresssing to a time of better police services, to a time with lower taxes, to a time with more city services, to a time where the crime was low -- all these choices even if this choice means that the politically connected millionaires have to pay their own property taxes
OR
Choice #2: Progressing to a time with less and less police, more crime than the high crime rate that exists now, to a time of less and less city services, and to a time when lower income and fixed income people struggle so much to pay their taxes that many have to make a choice between paying the tax bill and saving their house, or taking necessary medication.
Which is the better choice, DV??????
Of course he won't answer, but now, anytime he uses that term "regressive" we can all throw it up in his "face" that regressing to a safer, lower taxed city is better. When taxes are low, when crime is low, people will move here and stay here. But his "progressive" idea is causing people to leave in droves and making the city very very dangerous
|
Logged
Don't hold your breath waiting for any answers. DVR is a cheer leader for 35 straight years of DEM ruin in Schenectady and SS Savage ruining the County. In Gary M's immortal words; "The {DEMS} are still driving". Right-over a cliff. The idiotic DEM working together crew.
