At the risk of stating the obvious, it appears that the Town Board is about to approve a "golden parachute" for an employee of 8 months whose hiring required a change to the town (residency) law and the severance of Kim Bruhns, the former Executive Secretary.
A few questions ...
1. Was Ms. Bruhns awarded any severance payment when she was terminated? 2. What is the cost of retaining Ms. Mullally's services in her current or another capacity? 3. Who proposed this early retirement package? 4. Who in the current town government made the decision to hire Ms. Mullally in January knowing that she would be eligible for early retirement with less than a year of service to Rotterdam residents at the taxpayers' expense?
I do not believe Bruhns received any severance payment...Mullally is paid $52,000 a year to read Nancy Pelosi e-mails, a salary considerably higher than that paid to previous secretaries for the Supervisor...the State offered the retirement incentives and Doogie Howser and Bob Godlewski have been conniving ever since to cash in for select employees, including Mullally...and the Assembly Demokratz made the decision to hire Mullally for us...Godlewski was simply the venue through which it was executed. The Supervisor and new Board Members (DiLeva and Martin) were told that hey had to hire her. Not knowing any better, they voted to hire her, along with the residency rule change to allow it. DiLeva quickly learned better...she still righfully resents it...and has since vowed to never listen to them again...she checks everything herself...right down to the last detail....that's why she opposes the EMS tax district...that's why she opposes the retirement incentives...that's why she has quickly become a true champion for residents and taxpayers.
DiLeva and Parisi were not there...they did not want any part of this scheme...but you are right...DiLeva is fuming.
Mrs. DiLeva and Mr. Parisi should have been there -- should have spoke up .. even if they disagreed with the resolutions -- actually .. ecspecially if they disagreed with the resolution.
They should have voted .. so they could be on the official record as to where they stood on the issue.
At least - Matt Martin expressed his concerns and let his vote be on the record. GREAT JOB .. MATT.
George Amedore & Christian Klueg for NYS Senate 2016 Pete Vroman for State Assembly 2016[/size][/color]
"For this is what America is all about. It is the uncrossed desert and the unclimbed ridge. It is the star that is not reached and the harvest that is sleeping in the unplowed ground." Lyndon Baines Johnson
I have to say 'kudos' to ND!! It appears that she has finally gotten back to her conservative ideology. Because honestly, it was apparent that the dems had her hook line and sinker! She appears to have evolved into an independent thinker!! Good girl!
When the INSANE are running the ASYLUM In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the rule. -- Friedrich Nietzsche
“How fortunate for those in power that people never think.” Adolph Hitler
She should have been there for the vote - period. i don't care HOW she would have voted .. but she should have been there to vote.
Same for Mr. Parisi.
George Amedore & Christian Klueg for NYS Senate 2016 Pete Vroman for State Assembly 2016[/size][/color]
"For this is what America is all about. It is the uncrossed desert and the unclimbed ridge. It is the star that is not reached and the harvest that is sleeping in the unplowed ground." Lyndon Baines Johnson
ROTTERDAM Board backs exit option BY JUSTIN MASON Gazette Reporter
Supervisor Frank Del Gallo will have the option of offering four town workers a retirement incentive during the budget process, but he’ll have to receive majority approval from the Town Board. Board member Matt Martin joined Del Gallo and Deputy Super Robert Godlweski in supporting the incentive during a hastily called meeting Tuesday. Board members Gerard Parisi and Nicola DiLeva, who both voted to defeat the incentive during a meeting earlier this month, were not present. Martin, who previously opposed offering the incentive, said he changed his mind to allow Del Gallo all available options during the budget process. He said the board will still have oversight to determine whether the incentives are cost-effective. “This is just an option,” he said in explaining his vote in favor of the resolution. “It by no means retires anyone today.” But Tuesday’s vote could face challenges, since several members of the board weren’t properly notified about the meeting according to state law. At least two board members were notified only 27 hours before the meeting was scheduled instead of two days in accordance with the statute governing town meetings. “Somebody could contest the validity of whatever they passed,” said Robert Freeman, the executive director of New York’s Committee on Open Government. Frank Salamone, a Repub- lican running for the board’s lone vacancy this fall, also questioned the legality of the meeting. He said there didn’t seem to be a pressing emergency to call the meeting, since the board had already addressed the incentives twice during the month of August. “I don’t see how an emergency of your making can allow you to have an emergency meeting without proper notice,” he said. Town Attorney Michael Godlewski disagreed. He said proper notice was offered prior to the meeting. “The position of the town attorney’s office is that the prescribed requirements under the law have been fulfi lled,” he said. Town officials had until September to approve the incentive, which is only available to workers older than 55 who have at least 25 years invested into the state retirement system. Under the proposal, board members would have the ability to offer workers one additional month of service credit for each year of town employment for up to three years of additional retirement credit. Comptroller Patrick Aragosa has indicated the total payout from the incentive could cost the town about $191,000 — in addition to about $85,000 in unused vacation time payments — if it were offered to all eligible workers. In the past, he said the payouts have ultimately cost the town because the positions are inevitably fi lled. A Freedom of Information Law request answered by the town earlier this month indicated only four employees among the work force of 179 full- and part-time workers who would be eligible for the incentive. They are Sandra LeVielle and Kathryn Matteo in the Receiver of Taxes offi ce; Robert Meers in the Highway Department; and Darlene Mullally, a confidential secretary to Del Gallo. Del Gallo defended offering the incentives, despite the comptroller’s assertions. He said the town is in a diffi cult fi nancial situation that may require layoffs in addition to the positions that would be left vacant through the incentive. “We just want the option to look at it,” he said following the meeting. Salamone, the only resident to comment during the sparsely attended meeting, chastised the board for offering Mullally a “golden parachute” less than nine months into her service with the town. He also criticized them for going against Aragosa’s advice. His assertions drew a strong rebuke from Tony Cevera, the town Democratic Committee’s former chairman, who defended Mullaly’s more than three decades of service elsewhere. He also defended Del Gallo’s ability to run the town like a business. “I doubt the comptroller has ever run a business,” he said.
Rotterdam Town board members rescind vote, passing retirement incentive
John Purcell 08/31/10
Everyone thought Rotterdam’s retirement incentive debate was over, but it might have just begun.
During a Rotterdam Town Board special meeting tonight, Aug. 31, three Town Board members rescinded the previous special meeting vote on Thursday, Aug. 19, denying the board the option to use Part A of the 2010 Retirement Incentive offered by the state. In addition, a new section was added to the resolution, which was not made available to the public till the night of the meeting.
Deputy Supervisor Robert Godlewski and board member Matthew Martin joined Del Gallo during the special meeting, but fellow members Nicola DiLeva and Gerard Parisi weren’t in attendance. Del Gallo and Godlewski both voted yes previously, but Martin switched his stance and supported the resolution.
Town Supervisor Francis Del Gallo e-mailed board members and the media around 3 p.m. on Monday, Aug. 30, announcing a special meeting to be held on the following day at 6 p.m. In the original agenda only resolution 238.10 was listed, calling for the adoption of the previously discussed retirement incentive.
New York State Town Law in Section 62 states, “The supervisor of any town may, and upon written request of two members of the board shall within ten days, call a special meeting of the town board by giving at least two days notice in writing to members of the board of the time when and the place where the meeting is to be held.”
“I think legally they may have an issue with the resolution if somebody bothers to challenge it,” said Parisi after the vote. “If the residents did, I think they might be able to overturn the resolution.”
DiLeva echoed Parisi statement and said, “We see the agenda and the last resolution they had last night is completely different than the one the gave to us today. I say shame on them … It is not transparent and not the way you run town government.”
DiLeva and Parisi said confirmed they did not receive written notice two days in advance. Also, when a resolution is significantly changed another public hearing would need to be held.
Section 3 of the new resolution no. 239.10 added that a list of all targeted employees must be approved by a majority of the board before filing the tentative budget.
dvr is right, if it was normal meeting they should have voted
but...for legal reasons it might have been necessary for them not to take part
[/b]
I can't imagine what those legal reasons could possibly be .. they are our elected representaives (well - Mr. Parisi was appointed .. but still equal to the 4 we elected) .. when our elected Town Board meets every one of its members should be there .. unless he/she was ill or out of townfor legitimate reasons.
To avoid attending a meeting so as not to have to speak on an issue nor vote publicly on the issue is absultely wrong in my book. I know that Mr. Parisi and Ms. DiLeva were opposed to the resolutions - they should have been there to speak for the public record and cast a vote for the public record .. even if their 2 votes would not have changed the outcome.
George Amedore & Christian Klueg for NYS Senate 2016 Pete Vroman for State Assembly 2016[/size][/color]
"For this is what America is all about. It is the uncrossed desert and the unclimbed ridge. It is the star that is not reached and the harvest that is sleeping in the unplowed ground." Lyndon Baines Johnson