Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
What if the Tea Party Was Black!
Rotterdam NY...the people's voice    Rotterdam's Virtual Internet Community     Chit Chat About Anything  ›  What if the Tea Party Was Black! Moderators: Admin
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 146 Guests

What if the Tea Party Was Black!  This thread currently has 1,169 views. |
4 Pages 1 2 3 4 » Recommend Thread
Box A Rox
August 9, 2010, 7:29pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes
What if the Tea Party Was Black!
A serious question...

Would you look at Black TeaBaggers the same way you view White Teabaggers???

I don't think so!

Video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZtH7vH4yRcY&feature=player_embedded



The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Logged Offline
Private Message
MobileTerminal
August 9, 2010, 8:07pm Report to Moderator
Guest User
If they were black?  I guarantee you wouldn't be "allowed" to call them teabaggers
Logged
E-mail Reply: 1 - 47
Box A Rox
August 10, 2010, 6:06am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes
New Ox-Am Dictionary Names 'Teabagger' Word of the Year Finalist 2009

Among the "words of the year" were:
# birther - a conspiracy theorist who challenges President Obama's US birth certificate

# death panel - a theoretical body that determines which patients deserve to live, when care is rationed

# teabagger - a person who protests President Obama's tax policies and stimulus package, often through local demonstrations known as "Tea Party" protests (in allusion to the Boston Tea Party of 1773

If this definition is good enough for the New Oxford American Dictionary, then it's good enough for me.
The definition DOESN'T say it is an 'offensive term'. SO, TeaBaggers... get over it!


The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 2 - 47
Shadow
August 10, 2010, 6:31am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
11,107
Reputation
70.83%
Reputation Score
+17 / -7
Time Online
448 days 17 minutes
That description was not even in the dictionary until after it was used in a unkindly way by the liberal media on their talk shows. The current definition was created in 2009 to provide cover and to quell the disgust created by the likes of Olberman, Maddow, and Mathews.     In 2009, the Tea Party movement formed to protest new U.S. tax policies, referencing the Boston Tea Party for its name. The appellation "teabagger" emerged, prompting puns by both commentators and protesters based on its sexual connotation.[15][16] The president of the Media Research Center said that jokes made during CNN and MSNBC broadcasts were insulting.[17]
Logged
Private Message Reply: 3 - 47
Box A Rox
August 10, 2010, 6:49am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes
Quoted from Shadow
That description was not even in the dictionary until after it was used in a unkindly way by the liberal media on their talk shows. The current definition was created in 2009 to provide cover and to quell the disgust created by the likes of Olberman, Maddow, and Mathews.     In 2009, the Tea Party movement formed to protest new U.S. tax policies, referencing the Boston Tea Party for its name. The appellation "teabagger" emerged, prompting puns by both commentators and protesters based on its sexual connotation.[15][16] The president of the Media Research Center said that jokes made during CNN and MSNBC broadcasts were insulting.[17]


The media, including Olberman & Maddow, RESPONDED to the word "teabagger" being used BY THE TEA PARTY MEMBERS DESCRIBING THEMSELVES.... not the other way around.



The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 4 - 47
Box A Rox
August 10, 2010, 6:54am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes
TeaBaggers are US!

"The Evolution of the word Teabagger"
http://theweek.com/article/index/202620/the-evolution-of-the-word-tea-bagger



The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 5 - 47
55tbird
August 10, 2010, 6:55am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
3,211
Reputation
91.67%
Reputation Score
+11 / -1
Time Online
209 days 13 hours 13 minutes
Quoted from Box A Rox
What if the Tea Party Was Black!
A serious question...

Would you look at Black TeaBaggers the same way you view White Teabaggers???

I don't think so!

Video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZtH7vH4yRcY&feature=player_embedded



If you're insinuating racism, which most Libs reach for when they don't agree with something, there is a black Tea Party... its called the NAACP.


"Arguing with liberals is like playing chess with a pigeon; no matter how good I am at chess, the pigeon is just going to knock out the pieces, crap on the board, and strut around like it is victorious." - Author Unknown
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 6 - 47
Box A Rox
August 10, 2010, 7:19am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes
TeaBaggers show up at a rally with signs saying "GUNS TOMORROW" thinking it's "cute" or at least acceptable.  If a group of Blacks showed up at a rally with signs saying "GUNS TOMORROW" , it would be perceived by many as a threat.
Why the difference?


The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 7 - 47
Shadow
August 10, 2010, 7:27am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
11,107
Reputation
70.83%
Reputation Score
+17 / -7
Time Online
448 days 17 minutes
Have you driven thru Schenectady's Hamilton Hill area they already have the guns.
Logged
Private Message Reply: 8 - 47
CICERO
August 10, 2010, 7:42am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
18,232
Reputation
68.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -8
Time Online
702 days 15 hours 7 minutes
Quoted from Box A Rox

If this definition is good enough for the New Oxford American Dictionary, then it's good enough for me.
The definition DOESN'T say it is an 'offensive term'. SO, TeaBaggers... get over it!




Oxford Dictionaries


marriage

1 the formal union of a man and a woman, typically as recognized by law, by which they become husband and wife:
she has three children from a previous marriage


http://oxforddictionaries.com/view/entry/m_en_gb0501650#m_en_gb0501650

Does the definition of marriage offend you?


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 9 - 47
Box A Rox
August 10, 2010, 7:47am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes
Quoted from CICERO




Oxford Dictionaries


marriage

1 the formal union of a man and a woman, typically as recognized by law, by which they become husband and wife:
she has three children from a previous marriage


http://oxforddictionaries.com/view/entry/m_en_gb0501650#m_en_gb0501650

Does the definition of marriage offend you?


NOPE!  That's a marriage, and TeaBaggers are TeaBaggers!


The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 10 - 47
MobileTerminal
August 10, 2010, 8:14am Report to Moderator
Guest User
Quoted from CICERO




Oxford Dictionaries


marriage

1 the formal union of a man and a woman, typically as recognized by law, by which they become husband and wife:
she has three children from a previous marriage


http://oxforddictionaries.com/view/entry/m_en_gb0501650#m_en_gb0501650

Does the definition of marriage offend you?




^5 dude.
Logged
E-mail Reply: 11 - 47
Box A Rox
August 10, 2010, 8:32am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes
marriage

1 the formal union of a man and a woman, typically as "RECOGNIZED BY LAW,"

Laws are changed every day, as in California's Prop8.


The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 12 - 47
CICERO
August 10, 2010, 9:14am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
18,232
Reputation
68.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -8
Time Online
702 days 15 hours 7 minutes
Quoted from Box A Rox
marriage

1 the formal union of a man and a woman, typically as "RECOGNIZED BY LAW,"

Laws are changed every day, as in California's Prop8.


But the law can never recognize marriage between a man and a man without changing the definition of marriage.  That's the point of the argument.  Two men can't be "married" to each other.  Two women can't be "married" to each other.  As the current definition stands.  

The left is hell bent on further destroying one of the most important building blocks of society by social re-engineering and redefining the 2000+ year old definition of marriage.  


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 13 - 47
Box A Rox
August 10, 2010, 9:28am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes
Quoted from CICERO


" As the current definition stands."  



And the" current definition" may be obsolete in a few years.

Words change...
Laws change...
And some minds change...


The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 14 - 47
4 Pages 1 2 3 4 » Recommend Thread
|


Thread Rating
There is currently no rating for this thread