Pay attention....see if you can grasp this.... THE INVESTIGATION IS ONGOING AND RESULTS ARE NOT KNOWN YET! RESULTS COULD LEAD TO MANY OPTIONS IF GROUNDS ARE FOUND, FOR CRIMINAL CHARGES, FOR IMPEAHMENT, FOR EXONERATION (i.e. nothing found, etc.) So if you want to know the classified information that is "the investigation", maybe you could call Mr Mueller and ask him....DUMBA$$
It's your thread, you started it. I thought you may have insight of the alleged crime being investigated. Is it just a general investigation looking for any crime?
Sorry they couldn't achieve your level of expectation MR PERFECT! UN investigators agreed with claim. UK agreed with claim. Congress agreed. FIRE ALL THE BASTARDS!!!!
Mr Perfect? These were colossal failures. Or were they colossal failures? Nobody lost their job, no justice for the mass murder that occurred. No crime. But let's still have faith in the US Intelligence and justice system. They get it right most of the time.
It's your thread, you started it. I thought you may have insight of the alleged crime being investigated. Is it just a general investigation looking for any crime?
Are you for real or just want to play dumb? Who ties your shoes for you!
JUST BECAUSE SISSY SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO...BUT HE THINKS IT DOES!!!!! JUST BECAUSE MC1 SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO!!!!!
Are you for real or just want to play dumb? Who ties your shoes for you!
Reading the thread, I'm just trying to nail down the alleged crime being investigated. Is it treason, collusion, obstruction, or violation of the Emoluments Clause? Or all of the above and whatever else that they find? Has there been accusations of unpaid parking tickets yet?
Reading the thread, I'm just trying to nail down the alleged crime being investigated. Is it treason, collusion, obstruction, or violation of the Emoluments Clause? Or all of the above and whatever else that they find? Has there been accusations of unpaid parking tickets yet?
You really are becoming quite boring with the stupid act!
JUST BECAUSE SISSY SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO...BUT HE THINKS IT DOES!!!!! JUST BECAUSE MC1 SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO!!!!!
Sissy, this is for you so that you don't ask who's charged etc. until it's time. (from MSN)
Quoted Text
Greg Andres started on Tuesday, becoming the 16th lawyer on the team, said Josh Stueve, a spokesman for the special counsel.
Most recently a white-collar criminal defense lawyer with New York law firm Davis Polk & Wardwell, Andres, 50, served at the Justice Department from 2010 to 2012. He was deputy assistant attorney general in the criminal division, where he oversaw the fraud unit and managed the program that targeted illegal foreign bribery.
Mueller, who was appointed special counsel in May, is looking into possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia during the election, among other matters. Congressional committees are also investigating the matter.
That Mueller continues to expand his team means the probe is not going to end anytime soon, said Robert Ray, who succeeded Kenneth Starr as independent counsel for the Whitewater investigation during the Clinton administration.
"It's an indication that the investigation is going to extend well into 2018," said Ray. "Whether it extends beyond 2018 is an open question."
The special counsel last month asked the White House to preserve all of its communications about a June 2016 meeting that included the president’s eldest son, Donald Trump Jr., his son-in-law and adviser Jared Kushner, and Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya.
JUST BECAUSE SISSY SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO...BUT HE THINKS IT DOES!!!!! JUST BECAUSE MC1 SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO!!!!!
I didn't know that time was a criteria for an investigation of this type. Must be one of those important factors in your brain that measures how an investigation must be conducted.
JUST BECAUSE SISSY SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO...BUT HE THINKS IT DOES!!!!! JUST BECAUSE MC1 SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO!!!!!
I didn't know that time was a criteria for an investigation of this type. Must be one of those important factors in your brain that measures how an investigation must be conducted.
Not measuring it, just comparing the amount of time spent on this investigation to a couple of other highly successful national security investigations.
Not measuring it, just comparing the amount of time spent on this investigation to a couple of other highly successful national security investigations.
Somehow that is relevant?
JUST BECAUSE SISSY SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO...BUT HE THINKS IT DOES!!!!! JUST BECAUSE MC1 SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO!!!!!
Just an observation. You can decide if it's relevant. TICK-TOCK
One would think the investigation into the Russian Government overthrowing the Democratic outcome of an election in order to install a Russian puppet (Trump), would be a bit faster than a 2 year process.
Just an observation. You can decide if it's relevant. TICK-TOCK
One would think the investigation into the Russian Government overthrowing the Democratic outcome of an election in order to install a Russian puppet (Trump), would be a bit faster than a 2 year process.
As a comparison of investigations, what you have presented is useless dribble. As an observation, it's stupid! Now if you have a comparison to throw out there that is "comparable" to the ongoing investigation...like maybe Watergate. Watergate "plumbers" were caught JUN '72; JUL 74 impeachment proceedings begin. Little over 2 years from break-in to impeachment hearings to Nixon resignation AUG 74.
One (intelligent one) would realize that investigations take as long as necessary to come to fair and honest conclusion, and that pushing for results within a time constraint are cause for inaccurate and likely inconclusive factual results...(like WMD's), just for the sake of getting it done!
JUST BECAUSE SISSY SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO...BUT HE THINKS IT DOES!!!!! JUST BECAUSE MC1 SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO!!!!!
One (intelligent one) would realize that investigations take as long as necessary to come to fair and honest conclusion, and that pushing for results within a time constraint are cause for inaccurate and likely inconclusive factual results...(like WMD's), just for the sake of getting it done!
Hmmm..One would think with the accusation of Trump being a puppet installed ny the Russian Government, you would want to determine that pretty quickly. One would question whether 2 years in office signing legislation and executive orders by a president working for a foreign government is a good idea.
As a comparison of investigations, what you have presented is useless dribble. As an observation, it's stupid! Now if you have a comparison to throw out there that is "comparable" to the ongoing investigation...like maybe Watergate. Watergate "plumbers" were caught JUN '72; JUL 74 impeachment proceedings begin. Little over 2 years from break-in to impeachment hearings to Nixon resignation AUG 74.
Trump is accused of conspiring with Russia and acting as a puppet of a foreign government. That is TREASON. Watergate isn't the same comparison.
Logged
