When the INSANE are running the ASYLUM In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the rule. -- Friedrich Nietzsche
“How fortunate for those in power that people never think.” Adolph Hitler
Absolutely....awesome...yes....let's cheer and celebrate that one autocratic egomaniac can legally deny the rights of the 1st Amendment! Wonder what's next...maybe separate bathrooms by race!!!! Leave it to the Bumblers to celebrate idiocy!
JUST BECAUSE SISSY SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO...BUT HE THINKS IT DOES!!!!! JUST BECAUSE MC1 SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO!!!!!
Buckle up buttercup..........you ain't seen nothin' yet!!
When the INSANE are running the ASYLUM In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the rule. -- Friedrich Nietzsche
“How fortunate for those in power that people never think.” Adolph Hitler
Buckle up buttercup..........you ain't seen nothin' yet!!
Ahhh, so the DUMBLERS are all in favor of limiting free speech and the need for the Government at the highest level be held accountable for their actions and allowing the press to freely report to the people....very interesting, and VERY STUPID CORNFLAKES!
JUST BECAUSE SISSY SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO...BUT HE THINKS IT DOES!!!!! JUST BECAUSE MC1 SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO!!!!!
Ahhh, so the DUMBLERS are all in favor of limiting free speech and the need for the Government at the highest level be held accountable for their actions and allowing the press to freely report to the people....very interesting, and VERY STUPID CORNFLAKES!
Ahhhh...evidence on display for all...nonsense playing is your forte not mine! Typical!
Ohhhh..you must be referring to Obama's DOJ seizing phone records of AP reporters. Or maybe the DOJ investigating James Rosen for reporting leaks. I know its not as invasive as not letting reporters into a "gaggle" for which a transcript was provided to those not invited.
Ohhhh..you must be referring to Obama's DOJ seizing phone records of AP reporters. Or maybe the DOJ investigating James Rosen for reporting leaks. I know its not as invasive as not letting reporters into a "gaggle" for which a transcript was provided to those not invited.
Still living in the past...let's continue with same mistakes and not learn from them and avoid them for present and future. You are a broken OLD record....always referring to "can't do nothing about it now" stuff instead of wanting us to live in a better present and future.... WAKE UP YOU OLD TROLL!!!!!
JUST BECAUSE SISSY SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO...BUT HE THINKS IT DOES!!!!! JUST BECAUSE MC1 SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO!!!!!
Still living in the past...let's continue with same mistakes and not learn from them and avoid them for present and future. You are a broken OLD record....always referring to "can't do nothing about it now" stuff instead of wanting us to live in a better present and future.... WAKE UP YOU OLD TROLL!!!!!
Ohhh...ok....so since the reporter exclusion into the "gaggle" was days ago in the past, you need to stop living in the past. It's the present, look toward the future.
Have you ever heard the term "setting a precedent? In case you haven't, it means an earlier event or action that is regarded as an example or guide to be considered in subsequent similar circumstances.
Hey..."in the past" does the DOJ investigating a journalist as a criminal co-conspirator because the journalist reported leaks coming out of the Obama administration make Obama an autocratic egomaniac denying the rights of the first amendment?
By the way, you haven't provided any evidence of Trump violating the 1st Amendment.
Ohhh...ok....so since the reporter exclusion into the "gaggle" was days ago in the past, you need to stop living in the past. It's the present, look toward the future.
Have you ever heard the term "setting a precedent? In case you haven't, it means an earlier event or action that is regarded as an example or guide to be considered in subsequent similar circumstances.
Hey..."in the past" does the DOJ investigating a journalist as a criminal co-conspirator because the journalist reported leaks coming out of the Obama administration make Obama an autocratic egomaniac denying the rights of the first amendment?
By the way, you haven't provided any evidence of Trump violating the 1st Amendment.
By the way, you're still playing stupid SissyWahWah games...evidence is all over the place! Precedent does not dictate anything, as you point out....it's an example or guide but is not held as required norm! Past being a few days ago...really!!!! Now that is your "precedent"! Your whole purpose here is based on trolling and that's it...too obvious!
JUST BECAUSE SISSY SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO...BUT HE THINKS IT DOES!!!!! JUST BECAUSE MC1 SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO!!!!!
Lol...figures...no response to a president that actually used law enforcement to violate the 1st Amendment and the freedom of press.
Your whole purpose here is based on being a partisan political hack and that's it...too obvious.
Btw...you still haven't provided evidence of Trump violating the 1st Amendment. I won't hold my breath.
Partisan hack....now that's a hoot. Obviously you cherry pick my posts....badly. I'm not partisan in the least...I call them as I see them regardless of who and what party! Can't help it if your hero, our "so-called" President, is an assclown, egotistical, arrogant self centered jerk.....oh wait...sounds like you too! No wonder!!! Respond to a 2013 issue...why, where does that get me or us? Living in the "true past" are you? Too bad...you're missing a lot! Evidence....again....try searching it out yourself. Read online/media print/review media coverage...IT'S IN PLAIN SITE TROLL!!!!
JUST BECAUSE SISSY SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO...BUT HE THINKS IT DOES!!!!! JUST BECAUSE MC1 SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO!!!!!
Partisan hack....now that's a hoot. Obviously you cherry pick my posts....badly. I'm not partisan in the least...I call them as I see them regardless of who and what party! Can't help it if your hero, our "so-called" President, is an assclown, egotistical, arrogant self centered jerk.....oh wait...sounds like you too! No wonder!!! Respond to a 2013 issue...why, where does that get me or us? Living in the "true past" are you? Too bad...you're missing a lot! Evidence....again....try searching it out yourself. Read online/media print/review media coverage...IT'S IN PLAIN SITE TROLL!!!!
If your not a partisan, then tell me how you were outraged when the Obama administration actually used his DOJ the wiretap journalist and threatened prosecution of journalists reporting leaks coming out of his Administration. Then rank for me what is a more egregious violation of the 1st Amendment, not inviting 2 news agencies to a "gaggle" in the press secretary's office or instructing your attorney general to wiretap and threaten prosecution for reporting leaks.
Your outrage is phoney, and you clearly overstate Trump's administrative action because you don't like him. It's not based on actual violations of free soeech. Which Obama was a bigger violator of.
If you are non partisan and just calling balls ad strikes, then you would be honest and admit that Trump did not violate the first amendment and hasn't used federal power to intimidate or threaten prosecution of journalists he doesn't like. Obama actually did that. But that's in the past, so I have to ignore that it ever happened.
Remember, I don't vote, trump isn't my president. But at least im honest about his administrative action and not get hysterical about violating the first amendment - he didnt.
Logged
