No comments on that race?

Gee, for all the anti-Farley remarks DV has made on these boards, how bad Farley is, how much Farley used tax money for lavish vacations, (of course DV has not provide one shred of EVIDENCE to support his claim), but for all this anti Farley comments, where is DV?   Why isn't he out here commenting that Farley must be defeated?

Well DV????


You speak on so many other races, why are you avoiding commenting on this race?

What's with this silence by DV

Quoted from mikechristine1

Gee, for all the anti-Farley remarks DV has made on these boards, how bad Farley is, how much Farley used tax money for lavish vacations, (of course DV has not provide one shred of EVIDENCE to support his claim), but for all this anti Farley comments, where is DV?   Why isn't he out here commenting that Farley must be defeated?

Well DV????


You speak on so many other races, why are you avoiding commenting on this race?

What's with this silence by DV

So you posted this for no other reason than to draw your nemesis into your stupid little trap? Yeah, you're an intelligent mature person alright. Jerk!

Quoted from Alva White

So you posted this for no other reason than to draw your nemesis into your stupid little trap? Yeah, you're an intelligent mature person alright. Jerk!

^5!!!!!
Credibility LOST!!

(yawn)

Quoted from DemocraticVoiceOfReason

(yawn)

He can post about other races, but funny, he criticizes Farley so much, claims he's getting three pensions (but produced no evidence), claims he went on expensive vacations at taxpayer expense (but produces no evidence).

But for such a Farley-hater, obviously he endorses Chuckie's wife, that Chuckie with lavish pay, benefits and someday a pension, paid by the city taxpayers who has not been doing his job

I recommend that everyone write-in vote for some other person to represent the district.  

Quoted from DemocraticVoiceOfReason

I recommend that everyone write-in vote for some other person to represent the district.  

Are you going to write in your beloved pro-choice gal Susan Savage???????


HYPOCRITE.   Until he got his little do-nothing job because someone felt sorry for him (his multiple failures, failed at running for office, failed in insurance, failed in the seminary, can't even become a deacon), he constantly posted supporting candidates that were pro-choice.  Quite obvious his bosses dictate to him what he can say/write.

Maybe someone should copy his posting about his staunch support for the Savage woman---both in claiming she is wonderful for the city and county when she increases taxes on the poor to pay the taxes of the millionaires downtown), and his support for her an other pro-choice candidates.

The he/she monkey is an ignorant, cowardly dumb a**.   Apparently, is not even aware of the laws governing voting - such as that one can NOT vote in a State Senate district in which one does NOT live in.   All he/she can do is lob uninformed personal attacks --- just like a monkey sits in a tree and throws sh*t around.  

Quoted from DemocraticVoiceOfReason

The he/she monkey is an ignorant, cowardly dumb a**.   Apparently, is not even aware of the laws governing voting - such as that one can NOT vote in a State Senate district in which one does NOT live in.   All he/she can do is lob uninformed personal attacks --- just like a monkey sits in a tree and throws sh*t around.  

OK, my bad.  I fully know that one cannot vote in a district in which one does not live.    I was wrong, I mis-spoke in questioning if you were going to write-in Savage's name since you don't live in that district.

However you do have constantly commented and express support or opposition to candidates in districts in which you do not live--perfectly acceptable to comment on other districts' races.   But  can you explain your undying support and your LOVE for pro-abortion candidate Susan Savage when she was running?  


See, DV the difference between you and us (me and my better half) is that we can admit when we am wrong.   Now can you admit that you are wrong--can you post here that you were wrong,  that YOU LIED about county taxes are NOT lower than they were in the 1970's?   Can you admit that your love Savage has contributed, while on the county legislature, has contributed to the massive reduction in the city's tax base, the massive tax increases on homeowners because of her 100% support of making homeowners cover the cost of the taxes that downtown doe snot pay, her support of taxpayer handouts to millionaires downtown has caused thousands of homeowners in the city to lose their homes because they could not afford to pay their own taxes PLUS the taxes of the downtown millionaires, and all this has contributed massive increase in blight and abandoned homes throughout the city and people leaving the city in droves as PROVEN by the HUGE numbers of homes for sale.

Quoted from mikechristine1

we am wrong.  

"we am wrong ?"  You don't even know proper grammar.

Why can't you just admit that you are a mentally unbalanced troll who hides behind a username and pretends to have a spouse?

Quoted from DemocraticVoiceOfReason

"we am wrong ?"  You don't even know proper grammar.

Why can't you just admit that you are a mentally unbalanced troll who hides behind a username and pretends to have a spouse?

So I (Chris) was typing, Mike came in from working on the lawn and read over my shoulder and said change it to "we."


But leave it to you to change the subject and be a chicken

-- Can you explain why you go to extremes to avoid answer questions, such as going to extremes to avoid answering how you claim county taxes were lower than in the 1970's???  

--Can you EVER explain why you LOVE Susan Savage given her pro-abortion view???.

-- Can you EVER explain why you LOVE Susan Savage when she went to just about any extreme to increase taxes on the homeowner causing many to lose their homes???


I most assuredly can tell you I have a spouse, I have a husband.  And we will be celebrating our silver wedding anniversary in a few years.   We are an extremely happily married couple all these years, and DV, you can take note that as Catholics we did NOT use artificial birth control, we did NFP those first 5 years that we took to create a nest egg to allow me to be that mom who is at home with the children during the day before they are all in school.  Obviously you will never know the joy of sitting down with your children, reading to them, drawing with them, capturing the moments on video as they bake with you, then helping out at the school on fundraisers and chaperoning trips while then being able to have the flexible work schedule to work at home for the most part once your children are all in school.  And to be proud parents of a Hartwick student in nursing (well, somewhat worried parents after the past few months), and while we didn't buy a mansion, we know that we'll be mortgage free before the next one goes on to college.  

And prouder to know that we accomplished this as normal adults independent, no handouts from parents for a down payment, and when we are 50+ years old, we will NOT be living with mommies or daddies.


A 50+ year old who is not living like a normal adult, independent, but rather living with "two mommies" clearly has a mental imbalance.  

By the way all, DV has NEVER provided ONE TEENY WEENY SHRED OF EVIDENCE that Farley was going on lavish vacations at taxpayer expense.

Will DV EVER provide any evidence?   Will he provide  link to a website form the state that proves what he says?  


Let's see.   I predict he will NOT and that's probably because he tells fairy tales

Interesting article about "goofy looking dinosaurs" -- reminded me of the "same old sh*t" being shoveled by the he/she nayboob monkey.   He/she and the bullshit he/she has been shoveling is so old -- it is fossilized.

Newly Discovered Fossils Reveal Goofy-Looking Dinosaur
Helen Regan  Oct. 23, 2014    

"This creature wasn’t built for speed. That’s pretty obvious”

Scientists in Mongolia’s Gobi Desert have unearthed fossils that have allowed them for the first time to build a complete picture of one of the more bizarre-looking dinosaurs.

Deinocheirus mirificus, which means “unusual horrible hand” in Latin, has stunned scientists with its strange combination of features, according to a study in the journal Nature.

The recently discovered 70 million-year-old fossils suggest deinocheirus was humpbacked, had a ”beer-belly,” tufts of feathers and wide hips and feet that caused it to waddle.

“This is an entirely new body plan,” said Stephen Brusatte, a paleontologist at the University of Edinburgh in the U.K.


The fossils add to bones that were discovered 50 years ago. Back then scientists thought deinocheirus was smaller and fiercer, now they believe it was about the size of Tyrannosaurus rex, Nature reports.

“This creature wasn’t built for speed,” says Brusatte. “That’s pretty obvious.”

Scientists used data gathered from the fossils to create a video of what the dinosaur may have looked like and how it may have walked.

Quoted from DemocraticVoiceOfReason

Interesting article about "goofy looking dinosaurs" -- reminded me of the "same old sh*t" being shoveled by the he/she nayboob monkey.   He/she and the bullshit he/she has been shoveling is so old -- it is fossilized.

...

You just can NEVER NEVER NEVER provide one teeny weeny shred of EVIDENCE of ANYTHING you say.   Why not DV???  


You really need to go to your Fr Bob and do a very long confession.


"Bless me Father for I have sinned.   I have again told so many lies that I can't even remember how many"




DV,   how credible does one appear when one NEVER produces an OUNCE of EVIDENCE of what they say?   You Do know that WE provide TONS AND TONS of EVIDENCE of the things WE say, from OFFICIAL RECORDS and from LEGITIMATE, NON-TABLOID websites.


So where is your proof about Farley ??????