Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
Libya in chaos after Obama/Clinton topple Gadhafi
Rotterdam NY...the people's voice    Rotterdam's Virtual Internet Community    What's Going On In The Rest Of The world  ›  Libya in chaos after Obama/Clinton topple Gadhafi Moderators: Admin
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 90 Guests

Libya in chaos after Obama/Clinton topple Gadhafi  This thread currently has 1,153 views. |
1 Pages 1 Recommend Thread
CICERO
August 9, 2014, 12:03pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
18,232
Reputation
68.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -8
Time Online
702 days 15 hours 7 minutes
Quoted Text
As chaos reigns, Libya insists West must follow through after intervention

Posted at 2:45 pm

Saying “the Libyans will not make it alone,” Libyan Foreign Minister Mohamed Abdelaziz appealed to America and the international community on Thursday to follow through on its intervention that helped topple dictator Moammar Gadhafi from power in 2011, and help rebuild a failing Libyan state.

“We have one side of the coin to get rid of the dictatorial regime,” he told CNN’s Fred Pleitgen, in for Christiane Amanpour. “The other side is to build a state. If you are going to build a state, it means you have to provide the required assistance in a timely manner.”

Libya has sunk to even more chaotic depths of late, as militias – some of whom helped oust Gadhafi – battle across the country.

Fighting in the capital, Tripoli, has gotten so bad that the U.S. Embassy has evacuated its personnel and the country’s fledging new parliament has been forced to meet on the opposite end of the country, in the eastern city of Tobruk – about as far away from Tripoli as you can get while remaining in Libya.

“We are not a charity case,” Abdelaziz said. “And I have to make it very clear: It is the obligation of the international community, on the neighboring countries – either north of the Mediterranean, south of the Mediterranean – to take the case of Libya very seriously.”

Abdelaziz is in Washington for a U.S.-Africa summit, and to lobby the American government for more “engagement” in the Libyan chaos.

“If Libya is becoming a failed state, the price will be paid very high not only for the Libyans, but also for the neighboring countries and the community as a whole.”

He is not, he emphasized, asking for military intervention.

“I make a big difference between military intervention and engagement,” he said.

The international community “should equip the state to build its institutions, starting with the defense, starting with the police, the intelligence services, institution building, capacity building – to build the capacity of the country, to give the responsibility of the Libyan people to shape their own destiny.”

The United States has said it is “committed to supporting the Libyan people during this challenging time,” but Abdelaziz is clearly seeking more than verbal support.

“It is really unfortunate that the international community continues to see Libya as a state that is going in the wrong direction and yet nothing has been moved.”

“All the factors at the moment are leading in the direction of a failed state,” he said. “I think the Libyan people should not be deserted at this particular stage.”


http://amanpour.blogs.cnn.com/.....-after-intervention/


Logged Offline
Private Message
CICERO
August 9, 2014, 12:17pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
18,232
Reputation
68.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -8
Time Online
702 days 15 hours 7 minutes
Nobel Peace Prize Winner Obama and partner Hillary brings peace to another lucky country!!!

Quoted Text
U.S.-Approved Arms for Libya Rebels Fell Into Jihadis’ Hands

By JAMES RISEN, MARK MAZZETTI and MICHAEL S. SCHMIDT
DECEMBER 5, 2012
WASHINGTON — The Obama administration secretly gave its blessing to arms shipments to Libyan rebels from Qatar last year, but American officials later grew alarmed as evidence grew that Qatar was turning some of the weapons over to Islamic militants, according to United States officials and foreign diplomats.


http://mobile.nytimes.com/2012.....ewanted=all&_r=0


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 1 - 2
CICERO
August 9, 2014, 12:27pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
18,232
Reputation
68.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -8
Time Online
702 days 15 hours 7 minutes
Quoted Text
Blood money: Obama administration approved $40billion in private arms sales to countries - including Libya

The U.S. government approved $40billion in private arms sales to countries including Libya and Egypt in 2009 - before they both dissolved into unrest this year - the State Department reported.

From 2008 to 2009, the U.S. authorised an increase in sales of military shipments to the now-toppled Egyptian government of Hosni Mubarak and the embattled kingdom of Bahrain.

But they did reduce the sales approvals to Muammar Gaddafi's Libyan government to $15million that year from $46million in 2008.

Muammar Gaddafi
Armed: From 2008 to 2009, the U.S. authorised an increase in sales of military shipments to the now-toppled Egyptian government of Hosni Mubarak, left, but reduced sales approvals to Muammar Gaddafi's Libyan government

Libya is now under a blanket weapons ban imposed last month by the Obama administration.

The $40billion overall figure during the first year of the Obama administration is an increase on total approved arms sales over the final year of the Bush administration in 2008, when the State Department licensed $34.2billion.

The $40billion figure during the first year of the Obama administration is an increase from the last year of the Bush government in 2008, when the State Department licensed $34.2billion
The sales were for military hardware from missile systems to bullets that the State Department authorises from private U.S. defence companies to other countries.

The figures do not include direct U.S. military aid to other nations, providing a limited snapshot of the ebb and flow of American arms abroad.

They are also for proposed sales rather than actual shipments.

The State figures detailed sales of U.S. defence items for Egypt ($101million) and Bahrain ($88million).

The figures show $458,000 in tear gas sales licensed to Egypt, where there were numerous reports that U.S.-supplied crowd-control gas suppressed democracy protesters in Cairo.

The U.S. authorised $18,000 in tear gas for Bahrain in 2008, but did not license it in 2009, the figures show.

Both countries were also authorised shipments of firearms, shotguns and close assault weapons.

All sales to Libya were restricted to non-lethal equipment.

Almost all of the equipment approved in 2009 were aircraft parts, compared to more than $1million that had been approved in 2008 for explosives and incendiary agents.

State Department spokesman Mark C Toner said earlier this week that the explosives were limited for use in oil exploration, but other officials raised concerns that the material could be converted into crude battlefield munitions.

In total $7.3billion of the $40billion in U.S.-approved defence sales went to Middle East and North African countries indicating the willingness to pay top dollar for American defence equipment.

Uprising: Figures show $458,000 in tear gas sales licensed to Egypt, where there were numerous reports that U.S.-supplied crowd-control gas suppressed democracy protesters in Cairo
Iraq, where U.S. forces are still drawing down and the fledgling government is struggling against militants, was the biggest buyer with $1.51billion, closely followed by Turkey with $1.5billion.

William D Hartung, director of the Arms and Security Initiative at the New America Foundation, a non-partisan Washington think tank questioned whether the U.S. was lax in providing such weaponry and crowd-control devices to authoritarian regimes.

'Some of these countries have very serious records of human rights abuses that are being overlooked in deference to other aspects of their relationship with the U.S.,' he said.


Recent riots: Iraq, U.S. forces are still drawing down and the fledgling government is struggling against militants, was the biggest buyer with $1.51billion
'When you're selling something like tear gas, what's it going to be used for? Dissenters, most likely.' However, other defence experts cautioned that other countries would quickly move to replace the U.S. in any arms sales stopped for human rights concerns.

Matthew Schroeder, an arms expert with the Federation of American Scientists, pointed to a massive surge of $470million in armaments to Libya by European nations while the U.S. held back.

'If you cut off arms sales, a client would go straight to U.S. competitors like Russia or China,' he said, adding that American monitoring of private defence sales is more systematic than most other nations.

State officials say the department is scrutinising the proposed defence sales as part of an ongoing review process.

As part of the review, the administration is also looking specifically at the use of force by Bahraini security and military forces on peaceful demonstrators and 'will take into account any evidence of gross violations of human rights,' according to a State official.


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new.....ing-Libya-Egypt.html


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 2 - 2
1 Pages 1 Recommend Thread
|

Rotterdam NY...the people's voice    Rotterdam's Virtual Internet Community    What's Going On In The Rest Of The world  ›  Libya in chaos after Obama/Clinton topple Gadhafi

Thread Rating
There is currently no rating for this thread