(This is a serious question, not a rhetorical one.)
For example: Scott Esk, a Republican Tea Party candidate in Oklahoma, got into a debate on Facebook last summer in which he advocated killing homosexuals:
Quoted Text
“I think we would be totally in the right to do it.” “That goes against some parts of libertarianism, I realize, and I’m largely libertarian, but ignoring as a nation things that are worthy of death is very remiss.”
When pressed, Esk added: "I never said I would author legislation to put homosexuals to death, but I didn't have a problem with it." "I look forward to applying Biblical principles to Oklahoma law," Esk writes on his website.
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
"Approval ratings go up and down for various reasons... An example is the high post 911 support for GWB even though he could be said to be responsible for the event." --- Box A Rox '9/11 Truther'
Melania is a bimbo... she is there to look at, not to listen to. --- Box A Rox and his 'War on Women'
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
When the INSANE are running the ASYLUM In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the rule. -- Friedrich Nietzsche
“How fortunate for those in power that people never think.” Adolph Hitler
(This is a serious question, not a rhetorical one.) For example: Scott Esk, a Republican Tea Party candidate in Oklahoma, got into a debate on Facebook last summer in which he advocated killing homosexuals:
Apparently others shy away from a straight forward discussion when a topic is presented. Some can't reply without checking with their cousins' brothers' aunts' brother-in-law. Others need to use the word "premise" to puff their chest.
I could care what affiliation this idiot has...he should be censured and any legitimate political party should be running in the opposite direction fast. His statements and beliefs are something left over from the Nazi era. I can't believe a person with political aspirations would even make such ignorant comments.
JUST BECAUSE SISSY SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO...BUT HE THINKS IT DOES!!!!! JUST BECAUSE MC1 SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO!!!!!
Apparently others shy away from a straight forward discussion when a topic is presented. Some can't reply without checking with their cousins' brothers' aunts' brother-in-law. Others need to use the word "premise" to puff their chest.
I could care what affiliation this idiot has...he should be censured and any legitimate political party should be running in the opposite direction fast. His statements and beliefs are something left over from the Nazi era. I can't believe a person with political aspirations would even make such ignorant comments.
Not surprised you are oblivious to a loaded question based on a false premise. I know, I know...Premise is a big word for you to comprehend. Maybe if box a cocks replace Teabagger with Marine, you would understand what a false premise is. My guess, you would go a ape sh*t if the title of the thread was "Are Marines Nuts???" Then we could have a "straight forward" discussion about crazy marines.
Not surprised you are oblivious to a loaded question based on a false premise. I know, I know...Premise is a big word for you to comprehend. Maybe if box a cocks replace Teabagger with Marine, you would understand what a false premise is. My guess, you would go a ape sh*t if the title of the thread was "Are Marines Nuts???" Then we could have a "straight forward" discussion about crazy marines.
What makes me apeshit is your demented ignorance and stupid useless rants. Grow-the-phuque-up!!! Oblivious is a word you obviously live by.
JUST BECAUSE SISSY SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO...BUT HE THINKS IT DOES!!!!! JUST BECAUSE MC1 SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO!!!!!
"Are Marines Nuts?" No doubt a few are... but in general, Marines are as sane as the rest of society.
Now for the question that is being avoided. "Are TeaBaggers Nuts?" Stoning gays to death is considered not only acceptable but a good policy... Yea, they are nuts!
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
"Are Marines "Teabaggers" Nuts?" No doubt a few are... but in general, Marines are as sane as the rest of society.
Now for the question that is being avoided. "Are TeaBaggers Nuts?" Stoning gays to death is considered not only acceptable but a good policy... Yea, they are nuts!
You answered your own question.
The funny thing is...if a wacky politician was able to make stoning gays public policy, there are plenty of cops and soldiers that will enforce the policy "because it's law". They would be the best damn stone throwers the world has ever seen. Who is more nuts at that point?
You are actually concerned about this, because you actually know law enforcement would enforce the policy. What's that say about your statist order takers? Yer funny box.
"Are Marines Nuts?" No doubt a few are... but in general, Marines are as sane as the rest of society.
Now for the question that is being avoided. "Are TeaBaggers Nuts?" Stoning gays to death is considered not only acceptable but a good policy... Yea, they are nuts!
Again, you are a liar, conniver and deceiver (the usual extremist liberal behavior). Just because one or even a few persons who claim to be Tea Partiers think something is acceptable does not mean that all.
George Amedore & Christian Klueg for NYS Senate 2016 Pete Vroman for State Assembly 2016[/size][/color]
"For this is what America is all about. It is the uncrossed desert and the unclimbed ridge. It is the star that is not reached and the harvest that is sleeping in the unplowed ground." Lyndon Baines Johnson
The funny thing is...if a wacky politician was able to make stoning gays public policy, there are plenty of cops and soldiers that will enforce the policy "because it's law". They would be the best damn stone throwers the world has ever seen. Who is more nuts at that point?
You are actually concerned about this, because you actually know law enforcement would enforce the policy. What's that say about your statist order takers? Yer funny box.
BINGO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
...you are a product of your environment, your environment is a product of your priorities, your priorities are a product of you......
The replacement of morality and conscience with law produces a deadly paradox.
STOP BEING GOOD DEMOCRATS---STOP BEING GOOD REPUBLICANS--START BEING GOOD AMERICANS
Liberty or TRANNY??? So now TeaBagger choices are LIBERTY or TRANSVESTITES??? I wonder how many TeaBaggers made it out of 3rd grade?
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
Liberty or TRANNY??? So now TeaBagger choices are LIBERTY or TRANSVESTITES??? I wonder how many TeaBaggers made it out of 3rd grade?
Probably the same percentage as reside in Hamilton hill and Arbor Hill...stupid knows no bounds
"Arguing with liberals is like playing chess with a pigeon; no matter how good I am at chess, the pigeon is just going to knock out the pieces, crap on the board, and strut around like it is victorious." - Author Unknown
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
Logged
