So what you're saying is nobody.
It also doesn't shock me that you would vote for someone that faked she is a 'Native American' so she could be listed as a 'minority' and get special treatment at Harvard.
But we both know that she gets a pass at being a racist.
Maybe if you're nice, she'll send you a personally signed copy of her famous 'Pow Wow Chow' recipe
Bucky always bites on the FOXSNOOZE latest headline
From the Washington Post FACT CHECKER.
Scott Brown accuses Warren of Native American lies...
and
SCOTT GETS TWO BIG PINOCCHIOS FOR HIS LIE!
(BUT AT LEAST BUCKY BELIEVED IT! )
Brown said that Warren “checked the box claiming she was Native American” when she
applied to Harvard and Penn, suggesting the Democratic candidate somehow gained an
unfair advantage because of an iffy ethnic background. But there is no proof that she
ever marked a form to tell the schools about her heritage, nor is there any public evidence
that the universities knew about her lineage before hiring her.
The senator’s debate comments also suggest Warren actively applied for positions with
Harvard and Penn, but the evidence suggests the schools recruited her because of her
groundbreaking research and writings on bankruptcy. Harvard, in fact, did not give up on
her after she first turned down a tenured position with the university.
Some might assume that Warren listed herself as a minority in the law school directories to
attract offers from top schools, which would be a pro-active measure. The explanation that
she was reaching out to other Native Americans — when she was merely listed as a “minority”
— certainly appears suspicious, but there is no conclusive evidence that she used her status
in the listing to land a job.
But Warren appears to have been well-qualified for the teaching positions and excelled once
she was hired.
The Fact Checker expects accusers to satisfy the burden of proof for their charges. That
was the case when Sen. Harry Reid (D-Nev.) said that GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney
tried to avoid taxes with offshore accounts. We awarded four Pinocchios to Reid because the
senator lacked conclusive evidence — or much evidence at all, for that matter. We’ve also
knocked the Obama campaign repeatedly for jumping to unwarranted conclusions about Mitt
Romney’s record at Bain Capital.
The outstanding questions about Warren’s directory listing — and her relying on family lore
rather than official documentation to make an ethnic claim — certainly raise serious concerns
about Warren’s judgment. [b][/b]But in the debate, the Republican incumbent conflated conjecture
and sketchy information to make a claim not supported by the available evidence, and so he
earns Two Big Pinocchios.
Logged
