Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
Arming Federal Agencies
Rotterdam NY...the people's voice    Rotterdam's Virtual Internet Community    United States Government  ›  Arming Federal Agencies Moderators: Admin
Users Browsing Forum
Googlebot and 55 Guests

Arming Federal Agencies  This thread currently has 644 views. |
1 Pages 1 Recommend Thread
Shadow
April 4, 2014, 11:44am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
11,107
Reputation
70.83%
Reputation Score
+17 / -7
Time Online
448 days 17 minutes

Under attack: Depth of federal arms race should surprise, shock citizenry

By Rob Nikolewski  /   April 3, 2014  
THE LONG ARM OF THE LAW GETTING LONGER: The number of law enforcement agents, such as these from the Environmental Protection Agency, have grown in recent years.

By Rob Nikolewski │ New Mexico Watchdog

SANTA FE, N.M. — In late February, four federal agents carrying side arms with a drug-sniffing dog descended on the Taos Ski Valley in what was called a “saturation patrol.”

Authorities were working on tips of possible drug selling and impaired driving in the ski resort’s parking lot and surrounding area.

But the agents weren’t from the FBI, ATF or even the Drug Enforcement Administration.

Rather, the agents represented the U.S. Forest Service.

“It’s one of the untold stories about government,” said former New Mexico Gov. Gary Johnson, who lives in Taos, is an avid skier and has been a leading critic of the operation that turned up only a few minor infractions. “People don’t grasp the size and the scope of these entities and their law enforcement arms.”

It may come as a surprise to many U.S. taxpayers, but a slew of federal agencies — some  whose responsibilities seem to have little to do with combating crime — carry active law enforcement operations.

Here’s a partial list:

    The U.S. Department of Education
    The Bureau of Land Management (200 uniformed law enforcement rangers and 70 special agents)
    The U.S. Department of the Interior
    The U.S. Postal Inspection Service (with an armed uniformed division of 1.000)
    The National Park Service (made up of NPS protection park rangers and U.S. Park Police officers that operate independently)
    The Environmental Protection Agency (200 special agents)
    The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (224 special agents)
    The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

That’s right, NOAA — the folks who forecast the weather, monitor the atmosphere and keep tabs on the oceans and waterways — has its own law enforcement division. It has a budget of $65 million and consists of 191 employees, including 96 special agents and 28 enforcement officers who carry weapons.   http://watchdog.org/136244/federal-law-enforcement/
Logged
Private Message
bumblethru
April 4, 2014, 2:08pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
30,841
Reputation
78.26%
Reputation Score
+36 / -10
Time Online
412 days 18 hours 59 minutes
Quoted Text
That’s right, NOAA — the folks who forecast the weather, monitor the atmosphere and keep tabs on the oceans and waterways — has its own law enforcement division. It has a budget of $65 million and consists of 191 employees, including 96 special agents and 28 enforcement officers who carry weapons.   http://watchdog.org/136244/federal-law-enforcement/


where's all the talk of consolidation??


When the INSANE are running the ASYLUM
In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the rule. -- Friedrich Nietzsche


“How fortunate for those in power that people never think.”
Adolph Hitler
Logged
Private Message Reply: 1 - 10
GrahamBonnet
April 9, 2014, 11:37am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
9,643
Reputation
66.67%
Reputation Score
+16 / -8
Time Online
131 days 7 hours 47 minutes
They are all heavy now. Perhaps they outnumber us all? We will see.


"While Foreign Terrorists were plotting to murder and maim using homemade bombs in Boston, Democrap officials in Washington DC, Albany and here were busy watching ME and other law abiding American Citizens who are gun owners and taxpayers, in an effort to blame the nation's lack of security on US so that they could have a political scapegoat."
Logged
Private Message Reply: 2 - 10
the blob
April 12, 2014, 6:28am Report to Moderator

Jr. Member
Posts
69
Reputation
100.00%
Reputation Score
+1 / -0
Time Online
9 hours 35 minutes
Today the Democrats have placed all their hopes in Obama. But this man could put an end to their party. The great majority of blacks have also decided to vote for Obama. Only a fool does not know that their support for him is racially driven. This is racism, pure and simple. The downside of this is that if Obama turns out to be the disaster I predict, he will cause widespread resentment among the whites. The blacks are unlikely to give up their support of their man. Cultic mentality is pernicious and unrelenting. They will dig their heads deeper in the sand and blame Obama's detractors of racism. This will cause a backlash among the whites.

The white supremacists will take advantage of the discontent and they will receive widespread support. I predict that in less than four years, racial tensions will increase to levels never seen since the turbulent 1960's. Obama will set the clock back decades... America is the bastion of freedom. The peace of the world depends on the strength of America, and its weakness translates into the triumph of terrorism and victory of rogue nations. It is no wonder that Ahmadinejad, Hugo Chavez, the Castrists, the Hezbollah, the Hamas, the lawyers of the Guantanamo terrorists and virtually all sworn enemies of America are so thrilled by the prospect of their man in the White House.

America is on the verge of destruction. There is no insanity greater than electing a pathological narcissist as president.
Read more at http://www.snopes.com/politics/soapbox/vaknin.asp#fediXHtAzKwGBfWr.99










the fully fledged "war of terror" was the "new pretext" of predation on civilization
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 3 - 10
Box A Rox
April 12, 2014, 8:45am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes
Putting racism aside, if you were white, but in every social action, you were included (or excluded) with
minorities in this country... my guess is that you'd vote for Democrats for most issues.  
If you were included with immigrants, why would you vote for a Republican? (the Bush bros excluded).
If you were included with minorities when voting, why would you vote for the party that works very hard to
exclude your right to vote?  


The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 4 - 10
senders
April 13, 2014, 5:14am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
29,348
Reputation
70.97%
Reputation Score
+22 / -9
Time Online
1574 days 2 hours 22 minutes
Quoted from Box A Rox
Putting racism aside, if you were white, but in every social action, you were included (or excluded) with
minorities in this country... my guess is that you'd vote for Democrats for most issues.  
If you were included with immigrants, why would you vote for a Republican? (the Bush bros excluded).
If you were included with minorities when voting, why would you vote for the party that works very hard to
exclude your right to vote?  


because no matter what it isn't right to have a political party hold your leash and then claim yourself as a proud human.

it's the system that is the issue that pits us against one another and creates animosity....

just like public schools have the kids 'safely' locked in to show they care and are in charge of your childs safety...it's an
insidious way that a human's psyche is controlled at it's most basic level......

it's not the party that saves.....it's not the party that destroys....it's APATHY AND ACCEPTANCE OF STATUS QUO


...you are a product of your environment, your environment is a product of your priorities, your priorities are a product of you......

The replacement of morality and conscience with law produces a deadly paradox.


STOP BEING GOOD DEMOCRATS---STOP BEING GOOD REPUBLICANS--START BEING GOOD AMERICANS

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 5 - 10
Box A Rox
April 13, 2014, 7:01am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes
Quoted from senders


because no matter what it isn't right to have a political party hold your leash and then claim yourself as a proud human.

it's the system that is the issue that pits us against one another and creates animosity....

just like public schools have the kids 'safely' locked in to show they care and are in charge of your childs safety...it's an
insidious way that a human's psyche is controlled at it's most basic level......

it's not the party that saves.....it's not the party that destroys....it's APATHY AND ACCEPTANCE OF STATUS QUO


The marketing of the master-slave dialectic can be subsumed under the idea of the unnamed.


The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 6 - 10
Shadow
May 15, 2014, 9:55am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
11,107
Reputation
70.83%
Reputation Score
+17 / -7
Time Online
448 days 17 minutes
A May 7th solicitation by the U.S. Department of Agriculture seeks "the commercial acquisition of submachine guns [in] .40 Cal. S&W."

According to the solicitation, the Dept. of Agriculture wants the guns to have an "ambidextrous safety, semiautomatic or 2 round [bursts] trigger group, Tritium night sights front and rear, rails for attachment of flashlight (front under fore group) and scope (top rear), stock collapsible or folding," and a "30 rd. capacity" magazine.

They also want the submachine guns to have a "sling," be "lightweight," and have an "oversized trigger guard for gloved operation."

The solicitation directs "all responsible and/or interested sources...[to] submit their company name, point of contact, and telephone." Companies that submit information in a "timely" fashion "shall be considered by the agency for contact to determine weapon suitability."
Logged
Private Message Reply: 7 - 10
BuckStrider
May 15, 2014, 11:16am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
3,188
Reputation
76.47%
Reputation Score
+13 / -4
Time Online
71 days 23 hours 59 minutes
Quoted from Shadow
A May 7th solicitation by the U.S. Department of Agriculture seeks "the commercial acquisition of submachine guns [in] .40 Cal. S&W."

According to the solicitation, the Dept. of Agriculture wants the guns to have an "ambidextrous safety, semiautomatic or 2 round [bursts] trigger group, Tritium night sights front and rear, rails for attachment of flashlight (front under fore group) and scope (top rear), stock collapsible or folding," and a "30 rd. capacity" magazine.

They also want the submachine guns to have a "sling," be "lightweight," and have an "oversized trigger guard for gloved operation."

The solicitation directs "all responsible and/or interested sources...[to] submit their company name, point of contact, and telephone." Companies that submit information in a "timely" fashion "shall be considered by the agency for contact to determine weapon suitability."


Don't you know how dangerous corn is?





"Approval ratings go up and down for various reasons... An example is the high post 911 support for
GWB even though he could be said to be responsible for the event." --- Box A Rox '9/11 Truther'

Melania is a bimbo... she is there to look at, not to listen to. --- Box A Rox and his 'War on Women'

Logged
Private Message Reply: 8 - 10
Shadow
May 29, 2014, 5:21am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
11,107
Reputation
70.83%
Reputation Score
+17 / -7
Time Online
448 days 17 minutes
By Bill Gertz

The Washington Times

Wednesday, May 28, 2014
    Pentagon's directive No. 3025.18, “Defense Support of Civil Authorities"
A 2010 Pentagon directive on military support to civilian authorities details what critics say is a troubling policy that envisions the Obama administration’s potential use of military force against Americans.


The directive contains noncontroversial provisions on support to civilian fire and emergency services, special events and the domestic use of the Army Corps of Engineers.

The troubling aspect of the directive outlines presidential authority for the use of military arms and forces, including unarmed drones, in operations against domestic unrest.

“This appears to be the latest step in the administration’s decision to use force within the United States against its citizens,” said a defense official opposed to the directive.

Directive No. 3025.18, “Defense Support of Civil Authorities,” was issued Dec. 29, 2010, and states that U.S. commanders “are provided emergency authority under this directive.”

“Federal military forces shall not be used to quell civil disturbances unless specifically authorized by the president in accordance with applicable law or permitted under emergency authority,” the directive states.

“In these circumstances, those federal military commanders have the authority, in extraordinary emergency circumstances where prior authorization by the president is impossible and duly constituted local authorities are unable to control the situation, to engage temporarily in activities that are necessary to quell large-scale, unexpected civil disturbances” under two conditions.

The conditions include military support needed “to prevent significant loss of life or wanton destruction of property and are necessary to restore governmental function and public order.” A second use is when federal, state and local authorities “are unable or decline to provide adequate protection for federal property or federal governmental functions.”


“Federal action, including the use of federal military forces, is authorized when necessary to protect the federal property or functions,” the directive states.

Military assistance can include loans of arms, ammunition, vessels and aircraft. The directive states clearly that it is for engaging civilians during times of unrest.


A U.S. official said the Obama administration considered but rejected deploying military force under the directive during the recent standoff with Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy and his armed supporters.

Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com.....icy-t/#ixzz336OgcdAI
Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter
Logged
Private Message Reply: 9 - 10
CICERO
May 29, 2014, 6:12am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
18,232
Reputation
68.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -8
Time Online
702 days 15 hours 7 minutes
These are all normal government functions.  As long as there is no dissidents against the ruling class, there is no reason for them to turn the military against its own citizens.  Of course this has been authorized with no intent to use these powers, because that's what the government does.  No need for alarm - go back to bed.  Independence Day is in 5 weeks, start planning your back yard celebrations of freedom.


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 10 - 10
1 Pages 1 Recommend Thread
|


Thread Rating
There is currently no rating for this thread