Since you won't answer the question Henry... I an only surmise that you NEED AN ASSAULT WEAPON TO KILL OTHER AMERICANS SERVING IN THE POLICE AN MILITARY. You won't post it, but your every post says it.
It's called "domestic terrorism".
HAHA I can tell box is pissed at this story. Sorry box my firearms are for self-defense and having fun, I don't want to see anyone hurt unlike you.
"In the beginning of a change, the Patriot is a scarce man, brave, hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, however, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a Patriot."
HAHA I can tell box is pissed at this story. Sorry box my firearms are for self-defense and having fun, I don't want to see anyone hurt unlike you.
LOL! I didn't watch the story! LMAO @ PISSED! For self defense??? For fun??? Then there is no problem with registering the assault weapon then. Right??? If your only interest is self defense in your own home... why not register your weapon??? Unless... your view of "self defense" is similar to the SKINHEAD view... I need a weapon to protect me from Obama's coming race war.
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
LOL! I didn't watch the story! LMAO @ PISSED! For self defense??? For fun??? Then there is no problem with registering the assault weapon then. Right??? If your only interest is self defense in your own home... why not register your weapon??? Unless... your view of "self defense" is similar to the SKINHEAD view... I need a weapon to protect me from Obama's coming race war.
Why would I register something if I already passed a background check, isn't the background check what you wanted? well I did that with almost all the guns I ever owned and passed every time. So the real question is why do I need to register something I owned for years without incident, unless they wish to confiscate them at a future point.
"In the beginning of a change, the Patriot is a scarce man, brave, hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, however, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a Patriot."
Why would I register something if I already passed a background check, isn't the background check what you wanted? well I did that with almost all the guns I ever owned and passed every time. So the real question is why do I need to register something I owned for years without incident, unless they wish to confiscate them at a future point.
What I wanted??? LOL! A 2 minute background check is a "BEGINNING" not the end.
IMO... all guns in the US should be registered and ALL sales tracked. All stolen guns tracked. All sales should meet a FEDERAL requirement. Anyone who fails to safeguard their guns or secure them would be in danger of forfeiting their right to own them. Irresponsible GunHuggers endanger the rest of society in many ways, lack of oversight is just one of them. Automatic or semi automatic assault weapons should be banned. (Um... I'm still waiting for a valid reason that you NEED one)
America will continue to suffer from GunHugger violence and Gunhugger irresponsibility until the population has finally had enough. The Sandy Hook massacre was just the beginning to US citizens outrage. GunHuggers could join us and push for good gun laws... or they can lose their weapons.
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
Automatic or semi automatic assault weapons should be banned.
Another reason most NYers don't trust registering them, so are you admitting this is what the registration is for, for future confiscation.
"In the beginning of a change, the Patriot is a scarce man, brave, hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, however, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a Patriot."
Why would I register something if I already passed a background check, isn't the background check what you wanted? well I did that with almost all the guns I ever owned and passed every time. So the real question is why do I need to register something I owned for years without incident, unless they wish to confiscate them at a future point.
Box doesn't trust you. Though you never harmed a soul with your guns, your points of view expressed on this message board is reason enough for you to register your guns. The fact you disagree with the gun regulations he supports, that is enough to makes you a threat to society. You are, as he says, a "Gunhugger". He is paranoid of his fellow citizens that refuse to bend to his will.
Box doesn't trust you. Though you never harmed a soul with your guns, your points of view expressed on this message board is reason enough for you to register your guns. The fact you disagree with the gun regulations he supports, that is enough to makes you a threat to society. You are, as he says, a "Gunhugger". He is paranoid of his fellow citizens that refuse to bend to his will.
He still never responded to my post
Quoted Text
Unless the police can be at my house the very second a criminal attempts something then why wouldn't I be armed with what gun I'm used to and trust. But you and me both know cops respond after the crime, so even with all their firepower it would do me and my family no good. Its easy to talk when you live where you do and crime is almost non-existent. So go ahead and rely on someone you don't know how far away they are to save you, my gun is a lot closer then the nearest cop, I'll rely on that.
His attitude was always we should rely on others for our safety and if for some reason the cops don't make it on time we should be a victim, under no circumstances to we defend ourselves with a gun because as he believes more people will die. He puts more trust in a mass shooter or a home invader then he does a person or family who just wants to protect themselves.
"In the beginning of a change, the Patriot is a scarce man, brave, hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, however, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a Patriot."
Another reason most NYers don't trust registering them, so are you admitting this is what the registration is for, for future confiscation.
Is that what I'm admitting??? LMAO!
Read the post it starts IMO... IN MY OPINION. I would like to consider NOT banning assault weapons... I'm open to changing my mind on this issue, but so far I have not heard one valid reason why anyone other than police, would have any NEED for an assault weapon. I keep asking and get only "ummmm cause I want one" as an answer.
Again, I'm open to keeping assault weapons legal, and the only thing I have to base my opinion is... 20 dead children in Sandy Hook, against ... "Cause I Want Em".
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
Again, I'm open to keeping assault weapons legal, and the only thing I have to base my opinion is... 20 dead children in Sandy Hook, against ... "Cause I Want Em".
You can base your opinion on tens of thousands of those that have AR 15's that never killed children. That doesn't weigh into your opinion? That's a pretty narrow perspective.
The narrow minded bigots think ALL gun owners are dangerous and irresponsible....they group ALL gun owners into one group.
Just like they think ALL blacks are on welfare and lazy.
Just like they think ALL dems are left extremists.
Just like they think ALL reps are right extremists.
They pick and choose the 'groups' they want to 'group together'.
It's a narrow minded mind thought...they can't help it!
When the INSANE are running the ASYLUM In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the rule. -- Friedrich Nietzsche
“How fortunate for those in power that people never think.” Adolph Hitler
You can base your opinion on tens of thousands of those that have AR 15's that never killed children. That doesn't weigh into your opinion? That's a pretty narrow perspective.
YES! Lets discuss the "tens of thousands" who have AR15's and never killed children. If they killed 'adults' does that count???
Of the 148 weapons used in mass shootings from 1982 - 2012... More Than Half of Mass Shooters Used Assault Weapons and High-Capacity Magazines
Quoted Text
More than half of the killers we studied in our investigation of 62 mass shootings over the last three decades possessed weapons that would be banned by Feinstein's bill, including various semi-automatic rifles, guns with military features, and handguns using magazines with more than 10 rounds.
Consider those who have never killed with their AR15's... I did consider those who have never killed with their AR15's... I considered it in 2010 when: Adam Lanza was considered, cause he never shot anyone. Eduardo Sencion was considered, cause he never shot anyone. I could add a hundred more names who've never shot anyone... YET
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
YES! Lets discuss the "tens of thousands" who have AR15's and never killed children. If they killed 'adults' does that count???
I considered it in 2010 when: Adam Lanza was considered, cause he never shot anyone. Eduardo Sencion was considered, cause he never shot anyone. I could add a hundred more names who've never shot anyone... YET
Like I said, just owning a rifle makes somebody a potential mass murderer in your opinion. PARANOIA!
Hey, how bout those military shooters that lost their sh*t and went on shooting rampages? They WERE trained to use guns against people. Then you blame the gun and lack of laws when they actually do it.
Adam Lanza played simulation war video games with simulated killing, that was developed with help from the DoD, and marketed to children.
Like I said, just owning a rifle makes somebody a potential mass murderer in your opinion. PARANOIA! Hey, how bout those military shooters that lost their sh*t and went on shooting rampages? They WERE trained to use guns against people. Then you blame the gun and lack of laws when they actually do it. Adam Lanza played simulation war video games with simulated killing, that was developed with help from the DoD, and marketed to children. But blame guns for a persons tendencies to kill.
I've kind of given up on Cissy's little games. But I will humor him one more time... For the last time... The killer is the one who kills... OK Cissy??? Ya got that??? Do I need to post it yet again???
Some tools the Killer uses are much more efficient than others. For about 7 months while I was in a combat zone, I carried a SEMI AUTOMATIC (NOT AUTOMATIC) assault weapon. Just like the ones the GunHuggers covet. It was designed for combat, not hunting not target shooting but for combat... killing people. We carried 20 ROUND MAGAZINES. Not the 30 or 50 or 100 round drums now available for civilian use.
If a 20 round magazine was quite sufficient for military combat use... why would anyone (other than mass shooters or terrorists) need a larger capacity magazine???
So again I ask... Why would any civilian (other than mass shooters or terrorists) need an assault weapon and why would they need large capacity magazines??? Anyone have an answer besides "Um... Duhhhh, Ahhh, I want one?"
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
Logged
