Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
Navy yard shooting.....hmmmmmmmmm
Rotterdam NY...the people's voice    Rotterdam's Virtual Internet Community    United States Government  ›  Navy yard shooting.....hmmmmmmmmm Moderators: Admin
Users Browsing Forum
Googlebot and 15 Guests

Navy yard shooting.....hmmmmmmmmm  This thread currently has 5,603 views. |
9 Pages « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 » Recommend Thread
Henry
September 17, 2013, 10:25am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
6,058
Reputation
85.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -3
Time Online
2114 days 9 hours 31 minutes
Quoted from Box A Rox


I think the founding fathers would be ashamed if they found out that their version of the 2nd amendment
would lead to the deaths of so many Americans.



Their version was just a right that existed before they even put it on paper, that is why it is a right not a privilege. The right to bear arms didn't come the day they said it did


"In the beginning of a change, the Patriot is a scarce man, brave, hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, however, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a Patriot."

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 45 - 128
Box A Rox
September 17, 2013, 10:28am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes
Quoted from Henry


Their version was just a right that existed before they even put it on paper, that is why it is a right not a privilege. The right to bear arms didn't come the day they said it did


Yadda yadda yadda.  The RIGHTS no matter how you look at them, are only guaranteed in the USA by
the constitution.  
The 2nd amendment right is not an unlimited right to own any weapon you want for any purpose.



The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 46 - 128
Henry
September 17, 2013, 10:34am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
6,058
Reputation
85.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -3
Time Online
2114 days 9 hours 31 minutes
Quoted from Box A Rox


Yadda yadda yadda.  The RIGHTS no matter how you look at them, are only guaranteed in the USA by
the constitution.  
The 2nd amendment right is not an unlimited right to own any weapon you want for any purpose.



Says your opinion, good thing your opinion doesn't matter when it comes to my rights


"In the beginning of a change, the Patriot is a scarce man, brave, hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, however, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a Patriot."

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 47 - 128
CICERO
September 17, 2013, 10:50am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
18,232
Reputation
68.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -8
Time Online
702 days 15 hours 7 minutes
Quoted from Box A Rox


Follow Cissy's silly logic further...
"Why Should the Cops Have All the Fun Speeding...
I WANT FLASHING RED LIGHTS AND A SIREN TOO!"


OR

"WHY SHOULD ONLY COPS PUT THEIR LIVES IN DANGER ANSWERING DANGEROUS CALLS...
WHY SHOULDN'T ALL CITIZENS BE FORCED TO DO THAT DANGEROUS WORK." (Equal opportunity)


Cissy's point of view is so ridiculous it doesn't even warrant a reply!


You false analogy logic is incorrect.  I didn't say anything about speeding and sirens.  

Cops aren't forced to do dangerous work, they choose to do it and get paid.  You suggest citizens be forced to restrict their weapon options while a select group of citizens have access to more powerful weapons.  I do not suggest restricting weapons for government agents, but giving them the same access as the rest of the citizens.

You still never answered why one class of citizen gets access to more powerful weapons than other citizens?  Why does one group need more powerful weapons?


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 48 - 128
senders
September 17, 2013, 11:56am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
29,348
Reputation
70.97%
Reputation Score
+22 / -9
Time Online
1574 days 2 hours 22 minutes
Quoted from Box A Rox


I think the founding fathers would be ashamed if they found out that their version of the 2nd amendment
would lead to the deaths of so many Americans.



I'm going to project that the founding fathers would be ashamed if they found out that their version of life and freedom
would lead to abortion....

box,,,human nature will remain the same.....the only changes in the world are different shackles and
other made up fears...fears used by the government are just like the fears used by the churches....

oh my the sins of mankind.....whoa is me........


...you are a product of your environment, your environment is a product of your priorities, your priorities are a product of you......

The replacement of morality and conscience with law produces a deadly paradox.


STOP BEING GOOD DEMOCRATS---STOP BEING GOOD REPUBLICANS--START BEING GOOD AMERICANS

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 49 - 128
Box A Rox
September 17, 2013, 1:45pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes
Quoted from CICERO


You still never answered why one class of citizen gets access to more powerful weapons than other citizens?
  Why does one group need more powerful weapons?


Jezzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.  There are none so blind as those who will not see.

Who NEEDS assault weapons?
The military?
I say YES, Cicero says no everyone.  

Who needs assault weapons?
The police?
I say yes, Cicero says no.

In the past (I've posted the video twice) the police were outgunned by criminals in a shootout.
The criminals robbed a bank, but needed the firepower to fight the police NOT THE PUBLIC!

Would Cicero or Henry go after these bad guys?  NO way.  They are hiding in their bunkers waiting
for the coming race war... So who?

Of course, the answer that Cissy ignores... THE POLICE.

What should they use against criminals armed with body armor and assault weapons???
Pistols?
I think not.  

The police NEED assault weapons on certain occasions to capture like armed criminals.  

Henry needs his automatic weapons for the coming race war
and
Cicero needs his automatic weapons for the day he sees the govt collapse.  

Everyone else doesn't need them for anything.



The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 50 - 128
Henry
September 17, 2013, 2:20pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
6,058
Reputation
85.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -3
Time Online
2114 days 9 hours 31 minutes
Quoted from Box A Rox



Would Cicero or Henry go after these bad guys?  NO way.  They are hiding in their bunkers waiting
for the coming race war... So who?



Poor box needing to rely on others for his safety, how sad.


"In the beginning of a change, the Patriot is a scarce man, brave, hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, however, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a Patriot."

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 51 - 128
Libertarian4life
September 17, 2013, 4:22pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
7,356
Reputation
50.00%
Reputation Score
+12 / -12
Time Online
119 days 21 hours 10 minutes
Quoted from Shadow
...Sen. Dianne Feinstein, one of the strongest proponents of a ban on
assault weapons like the AR-15, to issue a statement the same day asking,
"When will enough be enough?"


Our government is the potent, the omnipresent teacher. For good or ill it
teaches the whole people by its example.
- Timothy McVeigh

Additionally, borrowing a page from U.S. foreign policy, I decided to send
a message to a government that was becoming increasingly hostile.
- Timothy McVeigh

Based on observations of the policies of my own government, I viewed this
action as an acceptable option.
- Timothy McVeigh


Leaders need to lead by example.

Killing has become acceptable as a problem solving tool!




Logged
Private Message Reply: 52 - 128
Libertarian4life
September 17, 2013, 4:29pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
7,356
Reputation
50.00%
Reputation Score
+12 / -12
Time Online
119 days 21 hours 10 minutes
Quoted from Box A Rox


Jezzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.  There are none so blind as those who will not see.

Who NEEDS assault weapons?
The military?
I say YES, Cicero says no everyone.  

Who needs assault weapons?
The police?
I say yes, Cicero says no.



What should they use against criminals armed with body armor and assault weapons???
Pistols?
I think not.  

The police NEED assault weapons on certain occasions to capture like armed criminals.  

Everyone else doesn't need them for anything.



SWITZERLAND WOULD LABEL YOU A WHACKJOB.

They don't have a homicidal government teaching homicide as a problem
solving tool.

Everyone can, and most of them do, have automatic weapons.

They are a thousand times safer than any US citizen.

They don't bankrupt their government building weapons of mass destruction.

They issue weapons of mass protection.


Logged
Private Message Reply: 53 - 128
Box A Rox
September 17, 2013, 5:45pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes
Quoted from Henry


Poor box needing to rely on others for his safety, how sad.


I rely on myself for my safety.
  
Note to others living with Henry (especially women)... the presence of a gun in your house
is more dangerous than living in a house without one.

I rely on the police to catch criminals.



The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 54 - 128
senders
September 17, 2013, 5:50pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
29,348
Reputation
70.97%
Reputation Score
+22 / -9
Time Online
1574 days 2 hours 22 minutes
Quoted from Box A Rox


I rely on myself for my safety.
  
Note to others living with Henry (especially women)... the presence of a gun in your house
is more dangerous than living in a house without one.

I rely on the police to catch criminals.



definition of criminal please....


...you are a product of your environment, your environment is a product of your priorities, your priorities are a product of you......

The replacement of morality and conscience with law produces a deadly paradox.


STOP BEING GOOD DEMOCRATS---STOP BEING GOOD REPUBLICANS--START BEING GOOD AMERICANS

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 55 - 128
Box A Rox
September 17, 2013, 5:53pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes
Quoted from senders


definition of criminal please....


No thanks senders... you're on your own.  I'm done.


The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 56 - 128
senders
September 17, 2013, 5:54pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
29,348
Reputation
70.97%
Reputation Score
+22 / -9
Time Online
1574 days 2 hours 22 minutes
definition of a criminal is a human being that although not convicted but is purported/charged with a crime and is not a criminal
yet, has money extorted from them, possible loss of job, family, community respect,,,,all because a neighbor thought what they
did was a crime and the police that respond look at how neighbor looks and decide if it is worthy of the hassle...

thought #1 "I get paid to do this"
thought #2 "person calling police looks like me and legitimate"
thought #3 "it looks good on my eval"
thought #4 (sometimes confused with #2) "my coworkers will pat me on the back"

definition of criminal(precrime of course) is $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$


...you are a product of your environment, your environment is a product of your priorities, your priorities are a product of you......

The replacement of morality and conscience with law produces a deadly paradox.


STOP BEING GOOD DEMOCRATS---STOP BEING GOOD REPUBLICANS--START BEING GOOD AMERICANS

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 57 - 128
senders
September 17, 2013, 5:56pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
29,348
Reputation
70.97%
Reputation Score
+22 / -9
Time Online
1574 days 2 hours 22 minutes
Quoted from Box A Rox


No thanks senders... you're on your own.  I'm done.


you are kidding aren't you???


...you are a product of your environment, your environment is a product of your priorities, your priorities are a product of you......

The replacement of morality and conscience with law produces a deadly paradox.


STOP BEING GOOD DEMOCRATS---STOP BEING GOOD REPUBLICANS--START BEING GOOD AMERICANS

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 58 - 128
Box A Rox
September 17, 2013, 6:00pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes


The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 59 - 128
9 Pages « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 » Recommend Thread
|


Thread Rating
There is currently no rating for this thread