DOJ pursues immunity for Bush and others for Iraq war crimes
August 22, 2013 The Department of Justice has filed a Grant of Immunity for war crimes against: George W. Bush, Richard Cheney, Condoleezza Rice, Colin Powell, Paul Wolfowitz, and Donald Rumsfeld. Amazing!
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
Luckily for the American people, the constitutional law professor's DOJ is prosecuting journalists and whistleblowers, while filing for immunity protecting his "political opponents" that he campaigned against with promises of "change".
Luckily for the American people, the constitutional law professor's DOJ is prosecuting journalists and whistleblowers, while filing for immunity protecting his "political opponents" that he campaigned against with promises of "change".
I'm amazed you posted this!
So once again, you're surprised because I don't fit into your box. Cissy... you have no idea!
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
So once again, you're surprised because I don't fit into your box. Cissy... you have no idea!
I can only judge by your history of posts and excusing of government lawlessness, especially when it comes to undeclared war and random military action. Obama will be expecting immunity from the next administration to protect him from his war crimes stemming from his "secret kill list" and drone policy.
I can only judge by your history of posts and excusing of government lawlessness, especially when it comes to undeclared war and random military action. Obama will be expecting immunity from the next administration to protect him from his war crimes stemming from his "secret kill list" and drone policy.
You forgot to throw in immuniuty for Vietnam...you're slipping! Predictable but slipping!!!
JUST BECAUSE SISSY SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO...BUT HE THINKS IT DOES!!!!! JUST BECAUSE MC1 SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO!!!!!
You forgot to throw in immuniuty for Vietnam...you're slipping! Predictable but slipping!!!
Didn't forget, that's a given. That was the first major mass slaughter where the US government officials responsible were given immunity. Even after the release of the pentagon papers, the American justice system still did nothing to the psychopaths that were involved. Talk about institutional racism in the justice system. If the US government goes around slaughtering non-whites, it isn't considered a crime in the eyes of the US justice system. It was just a "mistake" oooops!
Didn't forget, that's a given. That was the first major mass slaughter where the US government officials responsible were given immunity.
Really Cissy? You really are ignorant of history aren't you. I know that you loath "public education" but I assume that you were forced to attend. Didn't you learn anything? Did you even attend history class. Have you ever read a book on the history that you so often quote.
Your post that Vietnam was... in your words: " the first major mass slaughter where the US government officials responsible were given immunity" shows you have no idea of US History or World History. Your "FACTS" you just make up as you go along to suit your agenda.
Read the history of the firebombing of Dresden Germany... then come back and tell us all that Vietnam was somehow (in your little world) "a first". Had the US lost WW2, US officials who were responsible for Dresden would have been tried as war criminals. So would those responsible for the firebombing of Tokyo who's purpose was to start fires in the close neighborhoods of Tokyo. NOTE: The two nuclear bombs of Nagasaki and Hiroshima combined, killed an estimated 130,000 people. The Tokyo "firebombing" killed an estimated 140,000 including 100,000 on a single night (March 8-9, 1945).
Before you post about a subject you know nothing about, the least you could do is get a history book and read it.
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
Logged
