Yes... US MILITARY... THOSE NOT SPECIFICALLY DESIGNATED AS NAVY, ARMY, AIR FORCE ETC.
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
Report: Ron Paul received more military donations than GOP, Obama By Andrew Moran Feb 6, 2012 in Politics By Andrew Moran.
According to an internal analysis from the Ron Paul presidential campaign, the Texas Republican Congressman received more military donations than his GOP rivals and President Barack Obama in the fourth quarter.
OK. Lets start with the very first line of the Ron Paul Piece:
According to an internal analysis from the Ron Paul presidential campaign,
So some staffer in the Ron Paul campaign says something it must be true??? LMAO!
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
OK. Lets start with the very first line of the Ron Paul Piece:
According to an internal analysis from the Ron Paul presidential campaign,
So some staffer in the Ron Paul campaign says something it must be true??? LMAO!
Just like all the sh*t you post from Rachel Madcow, etc...
"Arguing with liberals is like playing chess with a pigeon; no matter how good I am at chess, the pigeon is just going to knock out the pieces, crap on the board, and strut around like it is victorious." - Author Unknown
OK. Lets start with the very first line of the Ron Paul Piece: According to an internal analysis from the Ron Paul presidential campaign, So some staffer in the Ron Paul campaign says something it must be true??? LMAO!
Just like all the sh*t you post from Rachel Madcow, etc...
So you would then accept the word of a Ron Paul Staffer, (or Rachel Maddow) over, Data from "OpenSecrets.Com?"
I'm not surprised!
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
OK. Lets start with the very first line of the Ron Paul Piece: According to an internal analysis from the Ron Paul presidential campaign, So some staffer in the Ron Paul campaign says something it must be true??? LMAO!
So you would then accept the word of a Ron Paul Staffer, (or Rachel Maddow) over, Data from "OpenSecrets.Com?"
I'm not surprised!
No, I don't believe either one, because of their obvious agendas, but you can't say the same since you and Madcow are in lockstep...
"Arguing with liberals is like playing chess with a pigeon; no matter how good I am at chess, the pigeon is just going to knock out the pieces, crap on the board, and strut around like it is victorious." - Author Unknown
No, I don't believe either one, because of their obvious agendas, but you can't say the same since you and Madcow are in lockstep...
Bucky seems to be desperate. First he brings Maddow into the thread, then uses her as his excuse.
Maddow is relevant how???
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
Bucky seems to be desperate. First he brings Maddow into the thread, then uses her as his excuse.
Maddow is relevant how???
Box, I'll go through this slow..I know the water is questionable up in G'ville...
You asked the following question: So you would then accept the word of a Ron Paul Staffer, (or Rachel Maddow) over, Data from "OpenSecrets.Com?"
I answered neither of them, because they are both biased...of course, you don't think so, otherwise you'd call out Madcow for what she is... I brought up Madcow as an example of bullshit you post and expect people to swallow it whole, while at the same time criticizing data from a Paul employee...
It's the pot calling the kettle black...I really can't be any clearer...
"Arguing with liberals is like playing chess with a pigeon; no matter how good I am at chess, the pigeon is just going to knock out the pieces, crap on the board, and strut around like it is victorious." - Author Unknown
Box, I'll go through this slow..I know the water is questionable up in G'ville...
You asked the following question: So you would then accept the word of a Ron Paul Staffer, (or Rachel Maddow) over, Data from "OpenSecrets.Com?"
I answered neither of them, because they are both biased...of course, you don't think so, otherwise you'd call out Madcow for what she is... I brought up Madcow as an example of bullshit you post and expect people to swallow it whole, while at the same time criticizing data from a Paul employee...
You brought up Maddow... which has nothing to do with the thread.
I never asked anyone to believe Maddow, but at least she is a representative of the media. Believe her or not, I don't care.
OpenSecrets.org, is a non partisan non biased party. Not Maddow Not Paul, but an outsider.
I wouldn't take Maddow or a Ron Paul Staffer's word for anything. They both are biased.
OpenSecrets.org is not.
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
You brought up Maddow... which has nothing to do with the thread.
I never asked anyone to believe Maddow, but at least she is a representative of the media. Believe her or not, I don't care.
OpenSecrets.org, is a non partisan non biased party. Not Maddow Not Paul, but an outsider.
I wouldn't take Maddow or a Ron Paul Staffer's word for anything. They both are biased.
OpenSecrets.org is not.
But yet you post Maddow stuff in this board repeatedly... If it's not because you believe it, then it's just to troll...
"Arguing with liberals is like playing chess with a pigeon; no matter how good I am at chess, the pigeon is just going to knock out the pieces, crap on the board, and strut around like it is victorious." - Author Unknown
He may no longer be in the Corps, but he is still a Marine. You on the other hand...
"While Foreign Terrorists were plotting to murder and maim using homemade bombs in Boston, Democrap officials in Washington DC, Albany and here were busy watching ME and other law abiding American Citizens who are gun owners and taxpayers, in an effort to blame the nation's lack of security on US so that they could have a political scapegoat."
I only trust Pinocchio's! Real FACTS are determined that way.
Yup, I give box 4 Pinocchio's for his statement
"In the beginning of a change, the Patriot is a scarce man, brave, hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, however, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a Patriot."
But yet you post Maddow stuff in this board repeatedly... If it's not because you believe it, then it's just to troll...
I occasionally post Maddow, Druggy Rush, I even on occasion post Rand Paul! Posting an editorial or an opinion doesn't mean that I share that point of view. Sometimes I post it to show just how deranged that view is.
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
LOL! Henry had nothing to post... so he posted it!
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
Logged
