Just one thought... When you say "discharge a .22 on private land"... I assume that you are talking about "on your own private land".
Go and read the laws regarding hunting, access, posted signs, public access, crossing over properties and distance from a road or home that the law allows.
In any case, a .22lr has a maximum range of appx 1.5 miles. Even though you are "plinking" on your own land, anyone within a mile and a half is 'in range'.
The SAFE act and tougher gun regulation will protect you.
It has always been illegal to shoot people or someone's house.
I do fully realize their range and we were taught to always know where we were shooting and everything beyond it. Our targets were always backed up with a proper hill or burm so nothing got out of our control. These days that doesn't seem to matter when some well connected individuals who move to the country will call repetitively till they are appeased and the long time home owners are threatened into stopping practices that have been going on for decades before. I am not just talking about just shooting.
'Open Carry Guitar' Rallies In Dallas Against Open Carry Gun Nuts
Quoted Text
(Reuters) - By the hundreds, guitar-toting Texans came to a bridge in downtown Dallas on Sunday to deliver a simple message that the streets would be a lot safer if people packed musical instruments instead of firearms. The event called Open Carry Guitar Rally was aimed at trying to curtail the desire of gun owners to carry handguns openly in public, mocking rallies held in support of such firearms measures. "A lot of the people that are here are gun owners. They just think that the open carry thing is crazy," said organizer Kyle Reynolds, 46.
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
Also this weekend in Texas, those gun hugging Islamists shot up a Mohammed cartoon party...I knew Boxy wouldn't bother posting it in this thread because all gun huggers are right wingers.
"Arguing with liberals is like playing chess with a pigeon; no matter how good I am at chess, the pigeon is just going to knock out the pieces, crap on the board, and strut around like it is victorious." - Author Unknown
(Reuters) - By the hundreds, guitar-toting Texans came to a bridge in downtown Dallas on Sunday to deliver a simple message that the streets would be a lot safer if people packed musical instruments instead of firearms.
Unless of course the guitar wielding super friends pulled their guitars out of their cases and started beating everyone they saw. Then it would be like "Damn, I wish someone had a gun."
EDIT: Almost forgot about the radical guitar jihadi element.....
"Approval ratings go up and down for various reasons... An example is the high post 911 support for GWB even though he could be said to be responsible for the event." --- Box A Rox '9/11 Truther'
Melania is a bimbo... she is there to look at, not to listen to. --- Box A Rox and his 'War on Women'
Also this weekend in Texas, those gun hugging Islamists shot up a Mohammed cartoon party...I knew Boxy wouldn't bother posting it in this thread because all gun huggers are right wingers.
Haters had a rally and, no surprise... some haters showed up to take em down. Funny! They called this a 'freedom of speech' rally. I wonder if they would consider an "anti Christ" rally in the same light?
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
Haters had a rally and, no surprise... some haters showed up to take em down. Funny! They called this a 'freedom of speech' rally. I wonder if they would consider an "anti Christ" rally in the same light?
Deflect and excuse...... 'not surprised...
"Arguing with liberals is like playing chess with a pigeon; no matter how good I am at chess, the pigeon is just going to knock out the pieces, crap on the board, and strut around like it is victorious." - Author Unknown
Muslims Condemn Texas Shooting: ‘Violence Is Never An Appropriate Response To Hate Speech’
Quoted Text
"Violence is never an acceptable response to hate speech, no matter how inflammatory and uncivilized that speech is. While we do not yet know what motivated these shooters, we urge calm and defer to local, state, and federal authorities to peaceably and justly resolve this."
Dr. Nasim Rehmatullah, National Vice President of Ahmadiyya Muslim Community USA
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
Haters had a rally and, no surprise... some haters showed up to take em down. Funny! They called this a 'freedom of speech' rally. I wonder if they would consider an "anti Christ" rally in the same light?
So Islamic jihadis who show up with rifles with drum magazines is 'no surprise' to you. They are just 'some haters that showed up to take them down'.
How come you didn't have this attitude toward 'Charlie Hebdo'? They were 'just some haters that showed up to take them down', right Boxy?
And if your answer here wasn't retarded enough....You blow us away with... "I wonder if they would consider an "anti Christ" rally in the same light?"
What?
I didn't hear of any Christians brandishing rifles and targeting people when 'Piss Christ' was premiered.
I didn't hear of any Christians setting off a bomb(s) the Brooklyn Museum of Art when Chris Ofili's 'The Holy Virgin Mary' was there. It's currently on display at the Museum of Old and New Art in Hobart, Tasmania. That building is still standing!
Do you see any Christians targeting gays after they are ordered to 'Bake the Cake'
I don't see any Christians conducting revenge terror attacks against Muslims because of the Christian genocide currently happening right now in the Middle east and Africa.
It's getting harder for me to tell if you're just a complete a**hole or literally cancer.
"Approval ratings go up and down for various reasons... An example is the high post 911 support for GWB even though he could be said to be responsible for the event." --- Box A Rox '9/11 Truther'
Melania is a bimbo... she is there to look at, not to listen to. --- Box A Rox and his 'War on Women'
How come you didn't have this attitude toward 'Charlie Hebdo'? They were 'just some haters that showed up to take them down', right Boxy?
Charlie Hebdo's work was about "FREE SPEECH". They would treat Christians, Muslims, Jews, Conservatives Liberals, all races, all religions, all political views the same way. This HATE GROUP was about Hate for Muslims. Nothing more.
Interesting enough, almost no one at the HATE rally was from Texas. Most all were from out of state, with almost no local interest in the event.
Check out the leader of this little group of HATERS, Pam Geller. From the Washington Post:
Quoted Text
Pamela Geller, the incendiary organizer of Texas ‘prophet Muhammad cartoon contest For those unfamiliar with Pamela Geller, she was in the news a few weeks ago for sponsoring an ad campaign across major U.S. cities with anti-Muslim posters saying, among other things, “Killing Jews is Worship that draws us close to Allah.” On Sunday, she was in the news again for sponsoring a “Jihad Watch Muhammad Art Exhibit and Cartoon Contest” in Garland, Tex., some 20 miles from Dallas, after which two suspects opened fire on a security guard before being shot and killed by police.
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
Yea hate speech. The nonprofit Southern Poverty Law Center has categorized Geller's organization, Stop the Islamization of America, as a hate group, deeming its ideology "anti-Muslim." Two other New York groups the SPLC cites as hate groups are also founded by Geller: The American Freedom Defense Initiative and her blog, Atlas Shrugs, as the Village Voice notes.
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith