Everyone thinks Obama's policies suck. LoosingLosing the Senate.
IMO, Obama could win a third term against most of the lineup so far by the GOP.
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
(I've seen this over and over again. Look at the poorest counties in this country... they are all in RED STATES.)
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
(I've seen this over and over again. Look at the poorest counties in this country... they are all in RED STATES.)
Let me try to understand this...
"Tea Party" Republicans have a misguided shame about being poor and vote against their own interests, and BELIEVE in freedom, while actually living in a wage indentured rigged system...
Does that conversely imply that people who most support Occupy Democrats vote FOR their OWN interests, since they are NOT MISGUIDED, and are PROUD of being poor and believe in total "DEPENDENCE" as the answer, because they fully understand they are just wage indentured in a rigged system?
"Tea Party" Republicans have a misguided shame about being poor and vote against their own interests, and BELIEVE in freedom, while actually living in a wage indentured rigged system...
Does that conversely imply that people who most support Occupy Democrats vote FOR their OWN interests, since they are NOT MISGUIDED, and are PROUD of being poor and believe in total "DEPENDENCE" as the answer, because they fully understand they are just wage indentured in a rigged system?
I love Cicero's "Converse Logic"! He knows it's false but can't help himself! (It is entertaining to watch!) "All cats are mammals," ~which in Cicero's Converse Logic means~ "All mammals are cats" I wonder if Cicero's friends (if he actually has any) fall for his ploys?
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
I love Cicero's "Converse Logic"! He knows it's false but can't help himself! (It is entertaining to watch!) "All cats are mammals," ~which in Cicero's Converse Logic means~ "All mammals are cats" I wonder if Cicero's friends (if he actually has any) fall for his ploys?
Your post never defined what your occupy hero believes "own interest" means. Or what they think the answer is if not "freedom". Or if they themselves think they are wage indentured. Or if they feel any shame about being poor.
I wonder if boxy's friends(joebxr) fall for his ploy of making a generalization about one group without offering their own personal beliefs about those they criticize.
Your post never defined what your occupy hero believes "own interest" means. Or what they think the answer is if not "freedom". Or if they themselves think they are wage indentured. Or if they feel any shame about being poor.
I wonder if boxy's friends(joebxr) fall for his ploy of making a generalization about one group without offering their own personal beliefs about those they criticize.
Cissy is dancin as fast as he can... He gets caught in yet another Logic Scam, and continues as if it never happened.
When in doubt... change the subject!
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
Change what subject? If all mammal are not cats...what are occupy liberals? There is no consequent. Hence the word "imply" in my post.
Your occupy hero never said. If I remember during their protest, they wanted free stuff for squatting in public and private parks.
Cissy posts a logical fallacy, then expects others to buy into his folly. (But it sure beats discussing the actual post!)
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
Cissy posts a logical fallacy, then expects others to buy into his folly. (But it sure beats discussing the actual post!)
Let's discuss the post then. What does Occupy author suggest "Tea Party" Republicans do to deal with their misguided shame of being poor, what should their answer be, if belief of "freedom" is the wrong answer ,and what should be the Tea Party Republicans "own interests". If we can get that on the table, then we can discuss the post.
Let's discuss the post then. What does Occupy author suggest "Tea Party" Republicans do to deal with their misguided shame of being poor, their solution of "freedom" to deal with their shame, and what should be the Tea Party Republicans "own interests". If we can get that on the table, then we can discuss the post.
If you consider that the poorest counties in the USA are in RED STATES, so those who are poorest vote for a party (THE GOP) who cuts benefits for the poor... They vote against their own interest. Republicans fill the discussion with gays, terrorists, ebola... anything except JOBS or something to help these poor counties.
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
If you consider that the poorest counties in the USA are in RED STATES, so those who are poorest vote for a party (THE GOP) who cuts benefits for the poor... They vote against their own interest. Republicans fill the discussion with gays, terrorists, ebola... anything except JOBS or something to help these poor counties. ]
Why do you believe money should be their only interest or should I say highest interest? Would you sell out everything you believe in for the chance at making a few more bucks off of other tax payers?
"In the beginning of a change, the Patriot is a scarce man, brave, hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, however, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a Patriot."
Why do you believe money should be their only interest or should I say highest interest? Would you sell out everything you believe in for the chance at making a few more bucks off of other tax payers?
Why do you assume that these poor Republicans want a "chance at making a few more bucks off of other tax payers?" What most of them need is jobs and job training, education and health care benefits.
Is that how you see your Republican Tax Cuts For The Rich??? A chance to scam your fellow tax payer???
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
Why do you assume that these poor Republicans want a "chance at making a few more bucks off of other tax payers?" What most of them need is jobs and job training, education and health care benefits.
Is that how you see your Republican Tax Cuts For The Rich??? A chance to scam your fellow tax payer???
You are the one assuming money is their number one priority, why don't you ask why they vote the way they do?
"In the beginning of a change, the Patriot is a scarce man, brave, hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, however, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a Patriot."
Why do you assume that these poor Republicans want a "chance at making a few more bucks off of other tax payers?" What most of them need is jobs and job training, education and health care benefits.
Is that how you see your Republican Tax Cuts For The Rich??? A chance to scam your fellow tax payer???
Many of the poor counties are Indian reservations. And even to rural West Virginia and Kentucky counties are poor because the mining industry was destroyed be EPA regulations and other federal policies. Democrats seem to not give a sh*t about their role in impoverishing people with their regulatory policies. The liberal will condemn the poor West Virginian that votes THEIR INTERST to preserve the coal industry, then blame them for voting for the republican trying to preserve their job from being destroyed by liberal environmentalist regulators.
...because the mining industry was destroyed be EPA regulations and other federal policies.
Very interesting...would love you to explain what the mining industry would look like today without those regulations. Please include the number of sick/injured/dead and the wage scales for the miners that would result. Would be great if you provide actual facts and not just your speculation.
JUST BECAUSE SISSY SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO...BUT HE THINKS IT DOES!!!!! JUST BECAUSE MC1 SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO!!!!!
Logged
