Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
Are You A Climate Change Denier?
Rotterdam NY...the people's voice    Rotterdam's Virtual Internet Community     Chit Chat About Anything  ›  Are You A Climate Change Denier? Moderators: Admin
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 127 Guests

Are You A Climate Change Denier?  This thread currently has 3,749 views. |
10 Pages « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 » Recommend Thread
Henry
August 8, 2013, 6:49pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
6,058
Reputation
85.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -3
Time Online
2114 days 9 hours 31 minutes


"In the beginning of a change, the Patriot is a scarce man, brave, hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, however, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a Patriot."

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 60 - 142
Box A Rox
August 9, 2013, 8:38am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes
Who Funds Climate Change Deniers?



The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 61 - 142
BuckStrider
August 9, 2013, 9:19am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
3,188
Reputation
76.47%
Reputation Score
+13 / -4
Time Online
71 days 23 hours 59 minutes
I'm going to start taking bets on how many times Boxy can recycle the same sh*t over and over until he gets tired.




"Approval ratings go up and down for various reasons... An example is the high post 911 support for
GWB even though he could be said to be responsible for the event." --- Box A Rox '9/11 Truther'

Melania is a bimbo... she is there to look at, not to listen to. --- Box A Rox and his 'War on Women'

Logged
Private Message Reply: 62 - 142
Box A Rox
August 9, 2013, 9:23am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes
Quoted from BuckStrider
I'm going to start taking bets on how many times Boxy can recycle the same sh*t over and over until he gets tired.


Or take bets on how long it takes the same people to realize that they've been scammed on
their Climate Change Denial belief.

Climate Change is a fact all over the world... except in the USA.  
There is no scientific debate on Climate Change, only political debate.


The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 63 - 142
Shadow
August 9, 2013, 9:25am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
11,107
Reputation
70.83%
Reputation Score
+17 / -7
Time Online
448 days 17 minutes

Major Danish Daily Newspaper Warns: ‘Globe May Be On Path To Little Ice Age…Much Colder Winters…Dramatic Consequences’!

Paper features Danish solar physicist Henrik Svensmark on the subject of the UN IPCC: '…many of the climate models used by IPCC and others overestimate the influence of CO2 and underestimate the influence of the sun. … The IPCC is very one-sided, so I don’t think there will be anything reasonable in the next report.'

By: Marc Morano - Climate DepotAugust 9, 2013 9:49 AM

By P Gosselin on 9. August 2013

Another major European media outlet is asking: Where’s the global warming?

Moreover, they are featuring prominent skeptic scientists who are warning of a potential little ice age and dismissing CO2 as a major climate driver. And all of this just before the release of the IPCC’s 5AR, no less!
The August 7 print edition of the Danish Jyllands-Posten, the famous daily that published the “Muhammad caricatures“, features a full 2-page article bearing the headline: ”The behavior of the sun may trigger a new little ice age” followed by the sub-headline: “Defying all predictions, the globe may be on the road towards a new little ice age with much colder winters.”

So now even the once very green Danish media is now spreading the seeds of doubt. So quickly can “settled science” become controversial and hotly disputed. The climate debate is far from over. And when it does end, it looks increasingly as if it’ll end in favor of the skeptics.

The JP writes that “many will be startled” by the news that a little ice age is a real possibility. Indeed, western citizens have been conditioned to think that nothing except warming is possible. Few have prepared for any other possibility.

In its latest 2-page report, the JP now appears to tell its readers that our views on climate science have to be much more open minded and unshackled from the chains of dogmatism.

JP starts by reminding readers that it was just over 100 years ago that the world had clawed itself out of the little ice age, which extended from 1400 – 1900, a time when the Thames river often froze over. All paths in determining the cause of the little ice age all seem to converge to a single factor: solar activity.
The Jyllands-Posten quotes David Hathaway:

    ‘We now have the lowest solar activity in 100 years,’ David Hathaway from American space research institute NASA newly concluded in connection to the release of new figures for the sun’s activity. He said the activity for the ongoing cycle is half of the previous cycle, and he predicted an even lower activity for the next cycle, which will hit us in few years.”

Suddenly even the greenest of media outlets among us are contemplating what the consequences of a quiet sun may be. The JP then quotes Irish solar specialist Ian Elliott, who says these consequences could be dramatic:

    It indicates that we may be on the path to a new little ice age. It seems likely we are on the path to a period with very low solar activity, which could mean that we may have some very cold winters.”

Elliott then cites the ice-cold winters of 2009 and 2010 as early signs.

JP then cites at length Danish astrophysicist Henrik Svensmark, who needs no introduction:

    Since the 1940s and up to 10 years ago we have had the highest solar activity in 1000 years. The last time we had solar activity that high was when we had the Medieval Warm Period from year 1000 to around 1300. … Historically there has been a close connection between solar activity and temperature for the last 1000 years. Therefore the sun’s activity will also have influence the coming many years. … The unusual thing right now is that sun’s activity is decreasing while there’s a great increase in atmospheric CO2. For that reason the question is how much the earth will cool in a time of decreasing solar activity. … The development is beautifully consistent with a cooling effect of the solar activity in the same period. This could mean that the temperature will not rise for the next 30 years or maybe begin to decrease.”

JP also quotes Svensmark on the subject of the IPCC: “…many of the climate models used by IPCC and others overestimate the influence of CO2 and underestimate the influence of the sun. … The IPCC is very one-sided, so I don’t think there will be anything reasonable in the next report.”

Where did all the heat go?

In the second part (see right) of the JP’s feature story on climate science, the daily asks whatever happened to all the missing warming?

   Despite predictions that the temperature on the globe should rise with a huge speed, nothing has really happened the last 10-15 years. However climate scientists are insisting we are in the middle of the heaviest global warming maybe ever, and that the temperature will rise with at least 2-4 degrees towards the year 2100.”

JP asks scientist Sebastian Mernild of the Glaciology and Climate Change Laboratory Center for Scientific Studies in Chile, who insists that ocean currents have taken the heat “down to the deep sea”.

Once unthinkable just a few years ago, the European media and JP are now starting to admit the oceans are a poorly understood wild card in the climate equation after all. JP openly states, “The oceans are generally regarded as the big wildcard in the climate discussion.” Jylland Posten ends its 2-page feature story with questions and comments by Svensmark:

    How should ocean water under 700 meters be warmed up without a warming in the upper part? … In the period 1990-2000 you could see a rise in the ocean temperatures, which fit with the greenhouse effect. But it hasn’t been seen for the last 10 years. Temperatures don’t rise without the heat content in the sea increasing. Several thousand buoys put into the sea to measure temperature haven’t registered any rise in sea temperatures.”     http://www.climatedepot.com/20.....amatic-consequences/
Logged
Private Message Reply: 64 - 142
BuckStrider
August 9, 2013, 10:42am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
3,188
Reputation
76.47%
Reputation Score
+13 / -4
Time Online
71 days 23 hours 59 minutes
Quoted Text
Climate Change is a fact all over the world... except in the USA.  


Oh look...Another Boxy recycle statement! What's this, like the 4th or 5th time you have used this line?

And again, No. Climate change is not a 'fact all over the world'.

I have already explained to you once that people who live at or near the equator do not experience climate change, as the temperature, humidity, precipitation and length of day are static year round.

Anyone that lives in the U.S. who does not believe in climate change is obviously insane since we experience all four seasons each year.




"Approval ratings go up and down for various reasons... An example is the high post 911 support for
GWB even though he could be said to be responsible for the event." --- Box A Rox '9/11 Truther'

Melania is a bimbo... she is there to look at, not to listen to. --- Box A Rox and his 'War on Women'

Logged
Private Message Reply: 65 - 142
Box A Rox
August 9, 2013, 11:20am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes
Quoted from BuckStrider



And again, No. Climate change is not a 'fact all over the world'.

I have already explained to you once that people who live at or near the equator do not experience climate change, as the temperature, humidity, precipitation and length of day are static year round.


Bucky demonstrates his ignorance of basic geography and climate science.


Kiribati Island (3 degrees from the equator)
********************************************************************
Quoted Text

The president of Kiribati, Anote Tong, is in talks with Fiji's military government to buy
up to 5,000 acres of land in order to relocate the 102,697 people that live in his country.

President Tong tells The Telegraph that this is their last resort: "Our people will have
to move as the tides have reached our homes and villages."

Kiribati is about halfway between Hawaii and Australia and is made up of 32 low-lying
atolls and one raised island. Most of its population has already moved to one island,
Tarawam, after the rest of their land disappeared beneath the ocean.

Villagers on Abaiang, one of the Kiribati Islands, had to relocate the entire village of
Tebunginako because of rising seas and erosion.

*****************************************************************
Maldives
3° 15' N from the Equator
Quoted Text
The Maldives, consisting of over 1,100 islands to the west of India, is the world's lowest-lying
nation. On average the islands are only 1.3 meters above sea level. The 325,000  residents
of the islands are threatened by rising sea levels.

A documentary called The Island President tells the story of President Mohamed Nasheed
of the Maldives as he confronts the rise of the sea level in his country. A rise of just three
feet would submerge the Maldives and make them uninhabitable.

*******************************************************************

Seychelles
4° 35' S from the Equator

Quoted Text
Seychelles consists of 115 granite and coral islands in the western Indian Ocean,
with a population of 87,122.
Scuba diver Micheal Espron tells The National: "The water used to be farther out. Soon,
the water will be right up into the hotel."

He also says that tourism will be affected when there are no beaches left around the
islands. Locals remember that there used to be much more land for people, but now
tourists are seen cramming into the small area of beaches that remain.  Seychelles Beach
A rise of just three feet would submerge the Maldives and make them uninhabitable.

***************************************************************

Also
~ Torres Strait Islands 10° 12' 5" S off the Equator,
~ Solomon Islands 8° 00' S, off the Equator,
~ Micronesia 06° 55 N off the Equator,

All threatened by sea level rise due to Climate Change
*************************************************

See:

11 Islands That Will Vanish When Sea Levels Rise
Business Insider
http://www.businessinsider.com/islands-threatened-by-climate-change-2012-10?op=1#ixzz2bUe1rz4M





The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 66 - 142
GrahamBonnet
August 9, 2013, 11:50am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
9,643
Reputation
66.67%
Reputation Score
+16 / -8
Time Online
131 days 7 hours 47 minutes
WE MUST RAISE TAXES, NOW! It will solve it!!!


"While Foreign Terrorists were plotting to murder and maim using homemade bombs in Boston, Democrap officials in Washington DC, Albany and here were busy watching ME and other law abiding American Citizens who are gun owners and taxpayers, in an effort to blame the nation's lack of security on US so that they could have a political scapegoat."
Logged
Private Message Reply: 67 - 142
Box A Rox
August 9, 2013, 11:52am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes
Quoted from GrahamBonnet
WE MUST RAISE TAXES, NOW! It will solve it!!!


WOW!  Graham supports tax increases!  TeaBaggers are not going to be happy with you!



The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 68 - 142
Shadow
August 9, 2013, 11:54am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
11,107
Reputation
70.83%
Reputation Score
+17 / -7
Time Online
448 days 17 minutes
How should ocean water under 700 meters be warmed up without a warming in the upper part? … In the period 1990-2000 you could see a rise in the ocean temperatures, which fit with the greenhouse effect. But it hasn’t been seen for the last 10 years. Temperatures don’t rise without the heat content in the sea increasing. Several thousand buoys put into the sea to measure temperature haven’t registered any rise in sea temperatures.”    http://www.climatedepot.com/20.....p;                                            Maybe the sea level isn't rising, could it be that the islands are sinking?
Logged
Private Message Reply: 69 - 142
Box A Rox
August 9, 2013, 11:56am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes
Quoted from Shadow
How should ocean water under 700 meters be warmed up without a warming in the upper part? … In the period 1990-2000 you could see a rise in the ocean temperatures, which fit with the greenhouse effect. But it hasn’t been seen for the last 10 years. Temperatures don’t rise without the heat content in the sea increasing. Several thousand buoys put into the sea to measure temperature haven’t registered any rise in sea temperatures.”    http://www.climatedepot.com/20.....p;                                         


It's your post Shadow... I have no idea how to make sense of your post... neither do most
climate scientists.


The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 70 - 142
Shadow
August 9, 2013, 12:14pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
11,107
Reputation
70.83%
Reputation Score
+17 / -7
Time Online
448 days 17 minutes
Well if the thousands of buoys haven't suggested a rise in sea level could the islands you mention be actually sinking back into the ocean as many islands have done in past history?
Logged
Private Message Reply: 71 - 142
Box A Rox
August 9, 2013, 12:24pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes
Quoted from Shadow
Well if the thousands of buoys haven't suggested a rise in sea level could the islands you mention be actually sinking back into the ocean as many islands have done in past history?


They're your buoys, not mine.




The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 72 - 142
Box A Rox
August 9, 2013, 5:02pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes


The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 73 - 142
BuckStrider
August 9, 2013, 5:03pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
3,188
Reputation
76.47%
Reputation Score
+13 / -4
Time Online
71 days 23 hours 59 minutes
OMG Boxy!

So you mean that people who live on coral reef islands (atolls) have to worry about flooding from the ocean?




I mean, come on! What is there to possibly worry about?




"Approval ratings go up and down for various reasons... An example is the high post 911 support for
GWB even though he could be said to be responsible for the event." --- Box A Rox '9/11 Truther'

Melania is a bimbo... she is there to look at, not to listen to. --- Box A Rox and his 'War on Women'

Logged
Private Message Reply: 74 - 142
10 Pages « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 » Recommend Thread
|


Thread Rating
There is currently no rating for this thread