ONE OF THE DUMBEST THINGS THAT HENRY HAS EVER POSTED!!!
George Zimmerman was NOT found innocent... He was found not guilty. A HUGE DIFFERENCE. The state couldn't PROVE Zimmerman guilty... no one no where found him 'innocent'!
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
ONE OF THE DUMBEST THINGS THAT HENRY HAS EVER POSTED!!!
George Zimmerman was NOT found innocent... He was found not guilty. A HUGE DIFFERENCE. The state couldn't PROVE Zimmerman guilty... no one no where found him 'innocent'!
Innocent until proven guilty, he was found not guilty, get over it.
"In the beginning of a change, the Patriot is a scarce man, brave, hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, however, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a Patriot."
"In the beginning of a change, the Patriot is a scarce man, brave, hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, however, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a Patriot."
"While Foreign Terrorists were plotting to murder and maim using homemade bombs in Boston, Democrap officials in Washington DC, Albany and here were busy watching ME and other law abiding American Citizens who are gun owners and taxpayers, in an effort to blame the nation's lack of security on US so that they could have a political scapegoat."
WASHINGTON — The Justice Department says it is looking into the shooting death of Trayvon Martin to determine whether federal prosecutors should file criminal civil rights charges now that George Zimmerman has been acquitted in the state case.
The department opened an investigation into Martin's death last year but stepped aside to allow the state prosecution to proceed.
In a statement Sunday, the Justice Department said the criminal section of the civil rights division, the FBI and the U.S. Attorney's office for the Middle District of Florida are continuing to evaluate the evidence generated during the federal probe, in addition to the evidence and testimony from the state trial.
The statement said that, in the government's words, "experienced federal prosecutors will determine whether the evidence reveals a prosecutable violation."
the feds will have a huge mountain to climb...even Holder admitted that. Part of the climb will be countering the already finshed fbi interviews that say point blank that zimmerman did NOT have racist intentions in this incident. the Fbi said zimmerman had a "small hero complex", but that was about it. I dont think they will even charge him.
"Arguing with liberals is like playing chess with a pigeon; no matter how good I am at chess, the pigeon is just going to knock out the pieces, crap on the board, and strut around like it is victorious." - Author Unknown
When the INSANE are running the ASYLUM In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the rule. -- Friedrich Nietzsche
“How fortunate for those in power that people never think.” Adolph Hitler
Innocent until proven guilty, he was found not guilty, get over it.
We agree that Zimmerman was found not guilty... Much like OJ, the evidence presented to the jury left them with the opinion that he was NOT GUILTY. Not Guilty and Innocent are two very different things.
Not guilty, the jury had 'reasonable doubt' of his guilt. The evidence wasn't sufficient to find him GUILTY of a crime.
Quoted Text
Juries never find defendants innocent. They cannot. Not only is it not their job, it is not within their power. They can only find them "not guilty." As a criminal-defense attorney, in the wake of each I have felt an overwhelming urge to share a frequent part of my closing arguments. It is the point at which I educate jury members to the distinction between their ability to return a verdict of "not guilty" and their inability to return a verdict of "innocent." In most of my cases, it is the most important piece of information I pass to the jury before it begins its deliberations.
A verdict of "not guilty" can mean two entirely different things. It can, of course, mean that you believe the defendant is innocent. However, it can mean something entirely different. A verdict of "not guilty" can mean a verdict of "not proven." Even if you are very sure the defendant is guilty, but the state has not proven it "beyond a reasonable doubt," then it is your sworn duty to return a verdict of "not guilty."
As I posted, the jury didn't find Zimmerman (or OJ) INNOCENT, they found them NOT GUILTY.
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
After his acquittal in the killing of Trayvon Martin, George Zimmerman is now set to renew his push for legal action against NBC News, the Washington Post reported.
The network was forced to apologize for its botched editing Zimmerman's 911 call in 2012. The edit made it sound like Zimmerman voluntarily told an operator that Martin was black. In fact, he was responding to a question about Martin's race.
NBC fired a reporter and a producer for the error, but that was not enough for Zimmerman, who announced in December that he was suing the network for defamation.
LOL @ DEFAMATION of CHARACTER + George Zimmerman... an oxymoron!
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
Even though I thought Zimmerman should have been found guilty of manslaughter EVERYONE is supposed to be innocent until proven guilty.
So if your not found guilty .........
Casey Anthony and OJ both found not guilty and they were guilty as hell
I've been hearing this retarded reasoning for the last couple of days now and I'm going to show you why it is.
The difference between OJ/Anthony and Zimmerman is that OJ/Anthony stated they DIDN'T do it and did everything they could to hide the facts.
Zimmerman stated that he DID do it, that his actions were in self defense and was open and forthcoming with investigators.
So stop trying to compare the two because they are totally different.
"Approval ratings go up and down for various reasons... An example is the high post 911 support for GWB even though he could be said to be responsible for the event." --- Box A Rox '9/11 Truther'
Melania is a bimbo... she is there to look at, not to listen to. --- Box A Rox and his 'War on Women'
I've been hearing this retarded reasoning for the last couple of days now and I'm going to show you why it is.
The difference between OJ/Anthony and Zimmerman is that OJ/Anthony stated they DIDN'T do it and did everything they could to hide the facts.
Zimmerman stated that he DID do it, that his actions were in self defense and was open and forthcoming with investigators.
So stop trying to compare the two because they are totally different.
Both OJ and Zimmerman are killers, and both were found not guilty (or more specifically 'not proven') of their crimes. If you believe the accused was guilty, but the state didn't prove the case, you have to find Not Guilty.
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
Both OJ and Zimmerman are killers, and both were found not guilty (or more specifically 'not proven') of their crimes. If you believe the accused was guilty, but the state didn't prove the case, you have to find Not Guilty.
Ok, what does this have to do with Zimmerman?
Unlike Anthony and OJ, Zimmerman didn't plan on killing anybody. He wasn't going out with the intent on hunting down some black guy to shoot him
"Approval ratings go up and down for various reasons... An example is the high post 911 support for GWB even though he could be said to be responsible for the event." --- Box A Rox '9/11 Truther'
Melania is a bimbo... she is there to look at, not to listen to. --- Box A Rox and his 'War on Women'
As I posted, the jury didn't find Zimmerman (or OJ) INNOCENT, they found them NOT GUILTY.
And as I said he is innocent until proven guilty, you might not agree but your opinion doesn't matter now does it, fact is he is an innocent man now in the eyes of the court and that's all that matters. There are quite a few cases I didn't agree with the verdict, I may not be happy but I don't go around crying about it and threatening violence over it. All this fake outrage is hilarious in my opinion, I seen people crying and having nervous breakdowns over this yet they never shed a tear for the inner city people who get killed by the dozens.
"In the beginning of a change, the Patriot is a scarce man, brave, hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, however, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a Patriot."
Fake outrage, how many of these people are protesting or crying over the black on black violence that is so rampant.
"In the beginning of a change, the Patriot is a scarce man, brave, hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, however, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a Patriot."
Logged
