Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
Conspiracy Theories
Rotterdam NY...the people's voice    Rotterdam's Virtual Internet Community     Chit Chat About Anything  ›  Conspiracy Theories Moderators: Admin
Users Browsing Forum
Googlebot and 144 Guests

Conspiracy Theories  This thread currently has 722 views. |
1 Pages 1 Recommend Thread
Box A Rox
June 11, 2013, 1:59pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes
Armed with some new information of seemingly normal people who believe the most outlandish
things...

Conspiracy Theory Poll Results

On our national poll this week we took the opportunity to poll 20 widespread and/or infamous
conspiracy theories.  Many of these theories are well known to the public, others perhaps to
just the darker corners of the internet.  Here’s what we found:

-37% of voters believe global warming is a hoax, 51% do not. Republicans say global warming
is a hoax by a 58-25 margin, Democrats disagree 11-77, and Independents are more split at
  41-51. 61% of Romney voters believe global warming is a hoax

-6% of voters believe Osama bin Laden is still alive

-21% of voters say a UFO crashed in Roswell, NM in 1947 and the US government covered
it up. More Romney voters (27%) than Obama voters (16%) believe in a UFO coverup

-28% of voters believe secretive power elite with a globalist agenda is conspiring to eventually
rule the world through an authoritarian world government, or New World Order.  A plurality
of Romney voters (38%) believe in the New World Order compared to 35% who don’t

-28% of voters believe Saddam Hussein was involved in the 9/11 attacks.  36% of Romney
voters believe Saddam Hussein was involved in 9/11, 41% do not

-20% of voters believe there is a link between childhood vaccines and autism, 51% do not

- 7% of voters think the moon landing was faked

-13% of voters think Barack Obama is the anti-Christ, including 22% of Romney voters

-Voters are split 44%-45% on whether Bush intentionally misled about weapons of mass
destruction in Iraq. 72% of Democrats think Bush lied about WMDs, Independents agree
48-45, just 13% of Republicans think so

-29% of voters believe aliens exist

-14% of voters say the CIA was instrumental in creating the crack cocaine epidemic in
America’s inner cities in the 1980’s

- 9% of voters think the government adds fluoride to our water supply for sinister reasons
(not just dental health)

- 4% of voters say they believe “lizard people” control our societies by gaining political power

- 51% of voters say a larger conspiracy was at work in the JFK assassination, just 25%
say Oswald acted alone

- 14% of voters believe in Bigfoot

- 15% of voters say the government or the media adds mind-controlling technology to
TV broadcast signals (the so-called Tinfoil Hat crowd)

- 5% believe exhaust seen in the sky behind airplanes is actually chemicals sprayed by
the government for sinister reasons

- 15% of voters think the medical industry and the pharmaceutical industry “invent” new
diseases to make money

- Just 5% of voters believe that Paul McCartney actually died in 1966

- 11% of voters believe the US government allowed 9/11 to happen, 78% do not agree

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/2011/PPP_Release_National_ConspiracyTheories_040213.pdf


The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Logged Offline
Private Message
senders
June 11, 2013, 2:10pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
29,348
Reputation
70.97%
Reputation Score
+22 / -9
Time Online
1574 days 2 hours 22 minutes
Quoted Text
15% of voters think the medical industry and the pharmaceutical industry “invent” new
diseases to make money


no...that would be the Monsanto group and GMOs...along with fertilizers who by the way are also owned by pharma companies

do your research

those who control the food supply control the masses
those who control the diagnosis control the masses

A LOT of diseases are environmentally caused...sunscreen/pesticides/fertilizers etc etc.....



...you are a product of your environment, your environment is a product of your priorities, your priorities are a product of you......

The replacement of morality and conscience with law produces a deadly paradox.


STOP BEING GOOD DEMOCRATS---STOP BEING GOOD REPUBLICANS--START BEING GOOD AMERICANS

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 1 - 2
senders
June 11, 2013, 2:14pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
29,348
Reputation
70.97%
Reputation Score
+22 / -9
Time Online
1574 days 2 hours 22 minutes
Quoted Text
Can fluoridated water cause cancer?


A possible relationship between fluoridated water and cancer risk has been debated for years. The debate resurfaced in 1990 when a study by the National Toxicology Program, part of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, showed an increased number of osteosarcomas (bone tumors) in male rats given water high in fluoride for 2 years (4). However, other studies in humans and in animals have not shown an association between fluoridated water and cancer (5–7).

In a February 1991 Public Health Service (PHS) report, the agency said it found no evidence of an association between fluoride and cancer in humans. The report, based on a review of more than 50 human epidemiological (population) studies produced over the past 40 years, concluded that optimal fluoridation of drinking water “does not pose a detectable cancer risk to humans” as evidenced by extensive human epidemiological data reported to date (5).

In one of the studies reviewed for the PHS report, scientists at NCI evaluated the relationship between the fluoridation of drinking water and the number of deaths due to cancer in the United States during a 36-year period, and the relationship between water fluoridation and number of new cases of cancer during a 15-year period. After examining more than 2.2 million cancer death records and 125,000 cancer case records in counties using fluoridated water, the researchers found no indication of increased cancer risk associated with fluoridated drinking water (6).

In 1993, the Subcommittee on Health Effects of Ingested Fluoride of the National Research Council, part of the National Academy of Sciences, conducted an extensive literature review concerning the association between fluoridated drinking water and increased cancer risk. The review included data from more than 50 human epidemiological studies and six animal studies. The Subcommittee concluded that none of the data demonstrated an association between fluoridated drinking water and cancer (6). A 1999 report by the CDC supported these findings. The CDC report concluded that studies to date have produced “no credible evidence” of an association between fluoridated drinking water and an increased risk for cancer (2). Subsequent interview studies of patients with osteosarcoma and their parents produced conflicting results, but with none showing clear evidence of a causal relationship between fluoride intake and risk of this tumor.

Recently, researchers examined the possible relationship between fluoride exposure and osteosarcoma in a new way: they measured fluoride concentration in samples of normal bone that were adjacent to a person’s tumor. Because fluoride naturally accumulates in bone, this method provides a more accurate measure of cumulative fluoride exposure than relying on the memory of study participants or municipal water treatment records. The analysis showed no difference in bone fluoride levels between people with osteosarcoma and people in a control group who had other malignant bone tumors (7).


...you are a product of your environment, your environment is a product of your priorities, your priorities are a product of you......

The replacement of morality and conscience with law produces a deadly paradox.


STOP BEING GOOD DEMOCRATS---STOP BEING GOOD REPUBLICANS--START BEING GOOD AMERICANS

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 2 - 2
1 Pages 1 Recommend Thread
|


Thread Rating
There is currently no rating for this thread