Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
Who Won The Iraq War?
Rotterdam NY...the people's voice    Rotterdam's Virtual Internet Community    What's Going On In The Rest Of The world  ›  Who Won The Iraq War? Moderators: Admin
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 41 Guests

Who Won The Iraq War?  This thread currently has 647 views. |
1 Pages 1 Recommend Thread
Box A Rox
June 3, 2013, 10:33am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes
Who Won George Worst Bush's Iraq Oil War???

China!

NY Times
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06.....oom.html?hp&_r=0




The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Logged Offline
Private Message
BuckStrider
June 3, 2013, 1:28pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
3,188
Reputation
76.47%
Reputation Score
+13 / -4
Time Online
71 days 23 hours 59 minutes
But....But....But you libertards said that we invaded Iraq FOR it's oil.

Guess that was bullshit.




"Approval ratings go up and down for various reasons... An example is the high post 911 support for
GWB even though he could be said to be responsible for the event." --- Box A Rox '9/11 Truther'

Melania is a bimbo... she is there to look at, not to listen to. --- Box A Rox and his 'War on Women'

Logged
Private Message Reply: 1 - 11
joebxr
June 3, 2013, 2:01pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
6,667
Reputation
70.00%
Reputation Score
+14 / -6
Time Online
276 days 6 hours 18 minutes
Quoted from BuckStrider
But....But....But you libertards said that we invaded Iraq FOR it's oil.

Guess that was bullshit.


We invaded Iraq because "He tried to call my Daddy...."
IT WAS PERSONAL FOR GWB!!!
No one seems to be screaming for his head over this....how come?


JUST BECAUSE SISSY SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO...BUT HE THINKS IT DOES!!!!!  
JUST BECAUSE MC1 SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO!!!!!  
Logged
Private Message Reply: 2 - 11
Libertarian4life
June 3, 2013, 2:12pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
7,356
Reputation
50.00%
Reputation Score
+12 / -12
Time Online
119 days 21 hours 10 minutes
The war is still ongoing.

No one has won anything.

The puppet government we forced into power gets bombed regularly.

China didn't win any war like the idiot box attempts to mislead readers.

China may be making more money at this time than the US by doing business with Iraq,
but the US spent a trillion on the war and that was all economic winning for the US war
machine industrial contractors.




Logged
Private Message Reply: 3 - 11
Box A Rox
June 3, 2013, 2:16pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes
Quoted from BuckStrider
But....But....But you libertards said that we invaded Iraq FOR it's oil.

Guess that was bullshit.


NO that was exactly why G Worst Bush invaded Iraq.  When it came time for the Country of Iraq
to award Oil Contracts... They remembered "Shock and Awe"... They remembered  Abu Ghraib...
They remembered the WMD Lies...
So...

Quoted Text
Russia's Lukoil on Saturday clinched a deal to develop Iraq's super giant West Qurna Phase
Two oilfield after having failed to convince Iraq to bypass the auction and revive an old Saddam
Hussein-era deal for the field.

During a visit to Baghdad earlier this year, Lukoil executives had invited the press to a news
conference where they had expected to announce the renewed Saddam deal. After a few
terse comments, they left empty-handed and visibly annoyed.

No U.S. firms bid for fields offered in the second round, and of the four fields bid on by U.S.
firms in the first round, only Exxon Mobil won a major prize, leading a group to clinch a deal
for the super giant West Qurna Phase One field.

U.S.-based Occidental came away with a quarter stake in a consortium that won a contract
for the giant Zubair field.

By contrast, Chinese state oil firms were involved in every first round bid and made a strong
showing in the second.

"The results of the bid round should lay to rest the old canard that the U.S. intervened in Iraq
to secure Iraqi oil for American companies," said Philip Frayne, a spokesman at the U.S.
embassy in Baghdad.

Reuters, Dec 2009
"No boon for U.S. firms in Iraq oil deal auction"
http://www.reuters.com/article/2009/12/12/us-iraq-usa-oil-idUSTRE5BB18Q20091212
The Bush Legacy:
G Worst Bush, a failed oil man from Texas, even failed miserably in his Oil War in Iraq.  


The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 4 - 11
DemocraticVoiceOfReason
June 3, 2013, 3:27pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
12,321
Reputation
20.83%
Reputation Score
+10 / -38
Time Online
151 days 7 hours 5 minutes
The extreme leftists lied about the Gulf War and the War Against Terrorism in Iraq -- you can still hear Tonko spouting the lies in his speeches.  These extremists leftists are caught in a time warp from the past --- there is NOTHING progressive about them or their thinking.

Saddam is dead and so are his two sons.  The new government may not be perfect but it is a helluva lot better than the evil thug that was once there.


George Amedore & Christian Klueg for NYS Senate 2016
Pete Vroman for State Assembly 2016[/size][/color]

"For this is what America is all about. It is the uncrossed desert and the unclimbed ridge. It is the star that is not reached and the harvest that is sleeping in the unplowed ground."
Lyndon Baines Johnson
Logged
Private Message Reply: 5 - 11
Box A Rox
June 3, 2013, 5:00pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes
*At the outset of the Iraq war, the Bush administration predicted that it would cost $50 billion
to $60 billion to oust Saddam Hussein,
restore order and install a new government.
(Cost of the war so far... over $1 Trillion )

*Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, to U.S. troops in Aviano, Italy:
"It is unknowable how long that conflict will last. It could last six days, six weeks.
I doubt six months."

* March 11, Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz, in a speech to the Veterans of
Foreign Wars: "The Iraqi people understand what this crisis is about. Like the people of
France in the 1940s, they view us as their hoped-for liberator."

* March 16, Vice President Cheney, on NBC's Meet the Press: "I think things have gotten
so bad inside Iraq, from the standpoint of the Iraqi people, my belief is we will, in fact,
be greeted as liberators. . . . I think it will go relatively quickly, . . . (in) weeks rather
than months."
He predicted that regular Iraqi soldiers would not "put up such a
struggle" and that even "significant elements of the Republican Guard . . . are likely to step aside."

*In the run-up to war in Iraq in early 2003, General Eric Shinseki testified to the Senate
Armed Services Committee that it would take “several hundred thousand soldiers” to
secure Iraq
Rumsfeld: What is, I think reasonably certain, is the idea that it would take several
hundred thousand U.S. forces, I think, is far from the mark.
Wolfowitz: But some of the higher-end predictions that we have been hearing recently,
such as the notion that it will take several hundred thousand U.S. troops to provide
stability in post-Saddam Iraq, are wildly off the mark. First, it’s hard to conceive that
it would take more forces to provide stability in post-Saddam Iraq than it would take
to conduct the war itself and to secure the surrender of Saddam’s security forces and
his army. Hard to imagine.

* The leaked minutes of a conversation between British intelligence officials and Prime
Minister Tony Blair,
referred to as the Downing Street memo:.
“Bush wanted to remove Saddam, through military action, justified by the conjunction of terrorism
and WMD, “But the intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy.”


The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 6 - 11
BuckStrider
June 3, 2013, 5:14pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
3,188
Reputation
76.47%
Reputation Score
+13 / -4
Time Online
71 days 23 hours 59 minutes
*Yawns*

I hate talking about the same crap over and over and over again.




"Approval ratings go up and down for various reasons... An example is the high post 911 support for
GWB even though he could be said to be responsible for the event." --- Box A Rox '9/11 Truther'

Melania is a bimbo... she is there to look at, not to listen to. --- Box A Rox and his 'War on Women'

Logged
Private Message Reply: 7 - 11
Box A Rox
June 3, 2013, 5:18pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
25,926
Reputation
58.62%
Reputation Score
+17 / -12
Time Online
514 days 11 hours 54 minutes
Quoted from BuckStrider
*Yawns*

I hate talking about the same crap over and over and over again.


Then don't!


The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral
philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

John Kenneth Galbraith

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 8 - 11
CICERO
June 3, 2013, 5:38pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
18,232
Reputation
68.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -8
Time Online
702 days 15 hours 7 minutes
Quoted from Box A Rox


Then don't!


I'm still waiting for the Obama Admin to try him for war crimes if it truly was illegal.  I guess justice isn't blind.


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 9 - 11
joebxr
June 3, 2013, 5:41pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
6,667
Reputation
70.00%
Reputation Score
+14 / -6
Time Online
276 days 6 hours 18 minutes
I offer my answer to the question...
NO ONE!

There are no winners in war...everyone loses!

There may be a victor or one dominates over the other,
or one benefits from the war, but in the end,
after all the losses incurred, after all the money spent,
after all the hurt and pain, there simply is no winner!!!!


JUST BECAUSE SISSY SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO...BUT HE THINKS IT DOES!!!!!  
JUST BECAUSE MC1 SAYS SO DOESN'T MAKE IT SO!!!!!  
Logged
Private Message Reply: 10 - 11
Libertarian4life
June 3, 2013, 5:51pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
7,356
Reputation
50.00%
Reputation Score
+12 / -12
Time Online
119 days 21 hours 10 minutes
Quoted from joebxr
I offer my answer to the question...
NO ONE!

There are no winners in war...everyone loses!

There may be a victor or one dominates over the other,
or one benefits from the war, but in the end,
after all the losses incurred, after all the money spent,
after all the hurt and pain, there simply is no winner!!!!


Holy crap, an actual true to life opinion.

And one that I really like.

You better get to the doctor.


Logged
Private Message Reply: 11 - 11
1 Pages 1 Recommend Thread
|


Thread Rating
There is currently no rating for this thread