If the words written in the right leaning site as you call it, isn't true why hasn't (OTTMAR EDENHOFER, UN IPCC OFFICIAL): sued the writer for liable. The UN is finally admitting the truth that climate change is about redistribution of wealth and has nothing to do with environment. I think that you're just not going to admit that you have been lied to and you believed every word.
OK... Show me the link from the UN stating: "The UN is finally admitting the truth that climate change is about redistribution of wealth and has nothing to do with environment."
Show me that link from the UN, (not from one of your bat sh!t crazy Right Winger blogs), and I will consider if I have been lied to.
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
When a person on the UN IPCC committee says it in an interview on a public station I tend to believe what he says. You on the other hand wouldn't believe the truth if it bit you in the butt if it went against your ideological views.
PCC official Ottmar Edenhofer, speaking in INovember 2010, advised that: “…one has to free oneself from the illusion that international climate policy is environmental policy. Instead, climate change policy is about how we redistribute de facto the world’s wealth…” http://www.forbes.com/sites/la.....unk-their-science/2/
When a person on the UN IPCC committee says it in an interview on a public station I tend to believe what he says. You on the other hand wouldn't believe the truth if it bit you in the butt if it went against your ideological views.
Your source is several OPINION pieces with quotes.
Shadow... If someone from the UN posts that he believes in Ghosts... Is it true??? You seem to think so.
If a UN blogger posts that the moon is made out of green cheese... is it?
If some Forbes opinion writer comes to the conclusion that climate change is a hoax... IS IT???
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
If nothing else Box you're predictable. Many people believe that there is such a thing as global warming but where the difference arises is the fact that it is man made. Right now all that they have is a theory. I'm sure man has contributed to some of the problem but not to the extent that you and the rest of your progressive friends would have us believe.
If nothing else Box you're predictable. Many people believe that there is such a thing as global warming but where the difference arises is the fact that it is man made. Right now all that they have is a theory. I'm sure man has contributed to some of the problem but not to the extent that you and the rest of your progressive friends would have us believe.
The scientific agreement that climate change is happening, and that it's caused by human activity, is significant and growing, according to a new study published this week. (May 2013)
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
The scientific papers you refer to are not reliable due to the fact that the authors have a known track record for manipulating figures to fit their agenda. Did man cause this spike in co2 as well Box?
There has historically been much more CO2 in our atmosphere than exists today. For example, during the Jurassic Period (200 mya), average CO2 concentrations were about 1800 ppm or about 4.7 times higher than today. The highest concentrations of CO2 during all of the Paleozoic Era occurred during the Cambrian Period, nearly 7000 ppm -- about 18 times higher than today.
The Carboniferous Period and the Ordovician Period were the only geological periods during the Paleozoic Era when global temperatures were as low as they are today. To the consternation of global warming proponents, the Late Ordovician Period was also an Ice Age while at the same time CO2 concentrations then were nearly 12 times higher than today-- 4400 ppm. According to greenhouse theory, Earth should have been exceedingly hot. Instead, global temperatures were no warmer than today. Clearly, other factors besides atmospheric carbon influence earth temperatures and global warming. http://geocraft.com/WVFossils/Carboniferous_climate.html
It doesn't matter to Boxy that the formula used is totally wrong and the data imputed into it is either false or corrupted.
All that matters is 'The Cause'
"Approval ratings go up and down for various reasons... An example is the high post 911 support for GWB even though he could be said to be responsible for the event." --- Box A Rox '9/11 Truther'
Melania is a bimbo... she is there to look at, not to listen to. --- Box A Rox and his 'War on Women'
The scientific papers you refer to are not reliable due to the fact that the authors have a known track record for manipulating figures to fit their agenda.
The Scientific Papers you refer to are not reliable due to the fact that the authors have a known track record for manipulating figures to fit their bosses agenda.
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
Who OWNS the Anti Climate Change Deniers? To quote Senders... "FOLLOW THE MONEY" 20 December 2013 (PhysOrg) – A new study conducted by Drexel University's environmental sociologist Robert J. Brulle, PhD, exposes the organizational underpinnings and funding behind the powerful climate change countermovement. This study marks the first peer-reviewed, comprehensive analysis ever conducted of the sources of funding that maintain the denial effort
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
"In the beginning of a change, the Patriot is a scarce man, brave, hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, however, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a Patriot."
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
In my opinion slim to none, I remember Gore talking about this and what does he do, goes out and buys million dollar property on the beach I remember your post about NYC wanting to secede, well let them.
"In the beginning of a change, the Patriot is a scarce man, brave, hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, however, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a Patriot."
In my opinion slim to none, I remember Gore talking about this and what does he do, goes out and buys million dollar property on the beach I remember your post about NYC wanting to secede, well let them.
This isn't about Gore or even NYC, it's about our whole planet.
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
Logged
20 December 2013 (PhysOrg)
