Coumo's gun laws will be repealed. Opinion or fact? I see you once again admit defeat. You always revert to your standby crap after you lose each debate.
Unless it is repealed... it is OPINION... of course.
If I've lost a debate by your standard, I'm not too concerned. On may of your issues, I just sit back and watch you make a fool of yourself.
I present my OPINION, which is just that... an opinion. I also present FACT that is FACT. I don't consider the two to be one... but some on this board have a difficult time telling the difference between the two.
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
Your argument is based on the requirement that dead babies equals assault weapons ban. It does not. Your question presumes a fact not in existence, fact creating hypocrite boy. How many crying hysterical gun grabbing abortionists does it take to beg the government to take away someone else's rights? Answer: Lol! Idiots!
It isn't MY ARGUMENT... It's MY REPLY to your post: "It's going to take a lot more than a Sandy Hook incident to restrict/reduce/regulate away people's rights."
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
I present my OPINION, which is just that... an opinion. I also present FACT that is FACT. I don't consider the two to be one... but some on this board have a difficult time telling the difference between the two.
As posted earlier... L4Life doesn't make a lot of sense some of the time... when I usually just sit back and watch him make a fool of himself.
This is one of those occasions. I wonder if he actually knows what a FACT is???
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
It isn't MY ARGUMENT... It's MY REPLY to your post: "It's going to take a lot more than a Sandy Hook incident to restrict/reduce/regulate away people's rights."
Again your convoluted reality extrapolates into your warped version of stupidity thereby claiming that my statement equals your question.
Your inability to defend your arguments makes me feel like I might be charged with child abuse for beating you so badly.
Don't let me keep you from your unicorns and rainbows.
Again your convoluted reality extrapolates into your warped version of stupidity thereby claiming that my statement equals your question. Your inability to defend your arguments makes me feel like I might be charged with child abuse for beating you so badly. Don't let me keep you from your unicorns and rainbows.
Posting one more time... I often just sit and watch him make a fool of himself.
A quote seen on this board comes to mind:
Quoted Text
A discussion with L4Life is like trying to play chess with a pigeon ~ he knocks the pieces over, ~ craps on the board, ~and flies back to its flock to claim victory"
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
He kind of looks like Stephen Hawking, an actual "genius" and a man who some consider to be the smartest man alive today in the world.
(Thanks for the compliment L4Life)
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
He kind of looks like Stephen Hawking, an actual "genius" and a man who some consider to be the smartest man alive today in the world.
(Thanks for the compliment L4Life)
I was thinking Sloth
"In the beginning of a change, the Patriot is a scarce man, brave, hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, however, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a Patriot."
— Sylvester Stallone says that despite his "Rambo" image and new shoot-em-up film "Bullet to the Head," he's in favor of new national gun control legislation. Stallone supported the 1994 "Brady bill" that included a now-expired ban on assault weapons, and hopes that ban can be reinstated.
One of L4Life's Hysterical Little Girls!
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
— Sylvester Stallone says that despite his "Rambo" image and new shoot-em-up film "Bullet to the Head," he's in favor of new national gun control legislation. Stallone supported the 1994 "Brady bill" that included a now-expired ban on assault weapons, and hopes that ban can be reinstated.
One of L4Life's Hysterical Little Girls!
Wow, conclusive proof that guns are bad and all knowing politicians can fix everything.
Come on box, that is the dumbest argument for gun control ever.
Logged
