L4L showed dead children killed by military violence. That's out of bounds.
Might I add, the acts of violence were committed in L4L's images were at the direction by what he considers "sane" people - military generals. Unlike Newtown, where we know the person committing the atrocities was INSANE.
He is trying to act is if it the blood that turned him away when we know it was the background of those dead which pissed him off, he doesn't want the real face of death being seen since it was committed by his fellow brothers.
"In the beginning of a change, the Patriot is a scarce man, brave, hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, however, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a Patriot."
Posted by the guy who bragged about all the large guns he fired in his life
I have fired more different types of weapons than most people that I know... I wouldn't let that fact intimidate you Henry. I don't want or need an assault weapon, and I oppose their sale in this country.
As posted above, there is a small number of individual's who due to a lack of maturity or due to a psychological imbalance, feel the need to handle weapons to compensate for a lack self esteem.
Quoted Text
A new study released today by the American Research Group shows that the larger an individual is along with also having a bigger gun directly relates to the size of that person’s penis size.
I can only surmise that the NEED by some on this board to 'possess' larger and more deadly weapons, this syndrome may be the underlying cause of their obsession.
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
I love box's post. "I never proposed to limit your right to defend yourself", unless...I did. LOL
You supported the NYS SAFE ACT. It restricts gun ownership. You cannot buy certain 12 ga shotguns, certain rifles and magazine capacites are restricted. The same weapons and magazine capacities that police deem critical to their self defense.
So not only do you support limiting my ability for self defense, you also support giving those same weapons to agents of the state for THEIR self defense.
Think about it Cissy... If you only feel safe with the "biggest gun on the block" (again the small penis/ big gun issue ) ... If you NEED a bigger gun than any one else, you will only support an ever growing arms race. The NEED you seem to profess is to DEFEND YOURSELF. Obviously, you may be out gunned, but if you knew anything about military tactics, you'd know that a defensive position can be held with a much smaller force. To defend your home you don't need an armored personel carrier... for a squad of police intering a riot situation, or a hostage situation, they DO need the protection of the vehicle.
Your need to POSSESS the 'biggest gun on the block" brings us back to the "compensation" issue again. Maybe Cic... what will satisfy your NEED to POSSESS a huge gun... is a Penal Transplant... not an AK47.
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
He has to talk about it, talking about it makes it seem as if he still has it, but we know the truth at his age even the blue pill wouldn't work anymore, his last hard on was probably under the Clinton administration
"In the beginning of a change, the Patriot is a scarce man, brave, hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, however, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a Patriot."
Your need to POSSESS the 'biggest gun on the block" brings us back to the "compensation" issue again. Maybe Cic... what will satisfy your NEED to POSSESS a huge gun... is a Penal Transplant... not an AK47.
Since my position is that citizen have the rights to the same weapons as law enforcement, then law enforcement agents have the smallest cocks. Look at that, WE AGREE!
Since my position is that citizen have the rights to the same weapons as law enforcement, then law enforcement agents have the smallest cocks. Look at that, WE AGREE!
I really don't understand your position. You as a private citizen will likely NEVER have to defend yourself with a weapon. Even in high crime areas most citizens never need a weapon. I agree that you don't know in advance when you may need a weapon for defense, but to be clear, I think we can both agree, unless you have some unusual circumstances armed or not, you will likely NEVER NEED A WEAPON.
I don't deny your right to defend yourself, but I do consider it reasonable to limit the weapons we all carry, criminals and citizens alike.
The weapon should match the need. The police may NEED a sniper rifle for some instances, and a shot gun for others. A howitzer would no doubt, end most crime situations, but it would also kill civilians and do a huge amount of damange to property... The weapon should match the situation.
For most homeowners, a shotgun a pistol or a rifle (or Mace, or a baseball bat) might be the appropriate weapon for the situation.
If on the other hand, you NEED a certain weapon because you consider it likely that you will doing battle with the police or the US military... Then your puney AK47 would do you no good. A well trained police force or a well trained infantry squad would likely eliminate even well trained "militia domestic terrorists" with little problem. Much of the time the police or the military use LESS force than is required, even though it puts them at personal risk, to help reduce the number of civilians injured or killed.
Cissy... You can defend yourself... you don't NEED any weapon larger than a shotgun to protect your home or a pistol to protect you on the streets.
Legal assault weapons on our streets do everyone harm and no one (except criminals and terrorists) any good.
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
He has to talk about it, talking about it makes it seem as if he still has it, but we know the truth at his age even the blue pill wouldn't work anymore, his last hard on was probably under the Clinton administration
How did Maggy Thatcher put it...
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
I really don't understand your position. You as a private citizen will likely NEVER have to defend yourself with a weapon.
I had to stop right here because this is too funny. You are advocating for GUN CONTROL while telling me that defending myself with a gun is "likely NEVER".(I thought America had a gun violence problem?) That's classic box-a-rox. You support restricting certain guns from private citizen because they are unlikely to have to defend themselves, while in the same breath convincing people that America has a gun violence problem. Which is it? That's why the gun grabbers arguments always fail. They need to scare you into beliving there is a gun violence problem, then they have to convince you have to disarm yourself from protecting yourself from the gun violence.
I had to stop right here because this is too funny. You are advocating for GUN CONTROL while telling me that defending myself with a gun is "likely NEVER".(I thought America had a gun violence problem?) That's classic box-a-rox. You support restricting certain guns from private citizen because they are unlikely to have to defend themselves, while in the same breath convincing people that America has a gun violence problem. Which is it?
I believe in the 2nd amendment, so I think that guns should be legal. I don't think that all guns should be legal and I do think that all gun owners should go through a background check.
There, make sense to you now???
I remember when seat belts first were required on cars... simple minds like yours objected to "restricting their FREEDOM"... ( The freedom to go through a windshiled and make the rest of us pay for it.)
Cissy, if you are interested in reducing the number of mass shootings, then get on board or come up with some ideas on how to do that... If you just want to argue... then post with L4Life... he's lonely and needs someone to focus his rants.
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
I believe in the 2nd amendment, so I think that guns should be legal. I don't think that all guns should be legal and I do think that all gun owners should go through a background check.
There, make sense to you now???
I remember when seat belts first were required on cars... simple minds like yours objected to "restricting their FREEDOM"... ( The freedom to go through a windshiled and make the rest of us pay for it.)
Cissy, if you are interested in reducing the number of mass shootings, then get on board or come up with some ideas on how to do that... If you just want to argue... then post with L4Life... he's lonely and needs someone to focus his rants.
even if you don't go through the windshield we all pay for it....THAT'S CALLED THE INSURANCE VIG!!!!!!!!!!!
get it?
the police make $$ for the town/county/state with a ticket or click it crap....
the insurance makes $$ out of playing the vig.....
IT'S A PONZI SCHEME all betting on humans.....HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
PS...flying is safer(they say) but a very very very very small percentage of Americans can afford it on a regular basis most can only afford the donkey transportation.
...you are a product of your environment, your environment is a product of your priorities, your priorities are a product of you......
The replacement of morality and conscience with law produces a deadly paradox.
STOP BEING GOOD DEMOCRATS---STOP BEING GOOD REPUBLICANS--START BEING GOOD AMERICANS
i am NOT going to allow myself to be restricted on my gun choice BECAUSE of a some lunies that are on government issued mind altering drugs...........which includes cops and military folks!!!!
When the INSANE are running the ASYLUM In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the rule. -- Friedrich Nietzsche
“How fortunate for those in power that people never think.” Adolph Hitler
even if you don't go through the windshield we all pay for it....THAT'S CALLED THE INSURANCE VIG!!!!!!!!!!!
get it?
the police make $$ for the town/county/state with a ticket or click it crap....
the insurance makes $$ out of playing the vig.....
IT'S A PONZI SCHEME all betting on humans.....HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
PS...flying is safer(they say) but a very very very very small percentage of Americans can afford it on a regular basis most can only afford the donkey transportation.
Senders... from your posts... your life is a ponzi scheme!
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
i am NOT going to allow myself to be restricted on my gun choice BECAUSE of a some lunies that are on government issued mind altering drugs...........which includes cops and military folks!!!!
And the rest of America is not going to allow you to carry machine guns... just cause "you wanna"!
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith
Cissy, if you are interested in reducing the number of mass shootings, then get on board or come up with some ideas on how to do that... If you just want to argue... then post with L4Life... he's lonely and needs someone to focus his rants.
Reducing it to lower than negligible? More people die from lighning strikes each year than from mass shootings. I don't want to pass a law making it illegal to be outside during a thunderstorm, or mandate that everybody have a storm shelter. More people are murdered with blunt objects than "assault rifles".
What does a background check do? Force people that want to commit murder to buy their weapon on the black market? There hasn't been ONE argument that would actually do anything to prevent Sandy Hook.
This is nothing more than a political debate, and political debates rarely offer solutions. The side of the issue you are on is more important than the effectiveness of the actual policy. It's all about re-election and the campaign platitudes they can use to convnice you to vote for them. I support "gun control" sounds so good in certain districts.
Logged
) ...
