It is as if when people get old, they revert to high school clique form all over again with the gossip and the cat-fights, etc. How sickening that we have to pay for this.
"While Foreign Terrorists were plotting to murder and maim using homemade bombs in Boston, Democrap officials in Washington DC, Albany and here were busy watching ME and other law abiding American Citizens who are gun owners and taxpayers, in an effort to blame the nation's lack of security on US so that they could have a political scapegoat."
It is funny -- Joe Surhada (GB) talking about high school cliques --- he and the NNTP/Nayboobs act like members of a junior high clique
George Amedore & Christian Klueg for NYS Senate 2016 Pete Vroman for State Assembly 2016[/size][/color]
"For this is what America is all about. It is the uncrossed desert and the unclimbed ridge. It is the star that is not reached and the harvest that is sleeping in the unplowed ground." Lyndon Baines Johnson
yes MZ is receiving unemployment. JL was never the go to person for the cook.
SET THE RECORD STRAIGHT
Repeating that MZ is NOT receiving unemployment.....and untrue statements as to why she is not working at the Center... MZ had no defense or support that the truth be told...intentional and personal since Jan 2010..
Secondly, statement was misinterpreted and spun in RR's statement......the words "go for" meant that JL had no intention of doing the clean-up of cook's intentional mess, or watch her make a mockery of the rules set forth by the TB..and be a party to the maliciouness of a certain few seniors, JS, DM's outside influence as a member of the Sr Assoc (how convenient) temp secretary and decided that it was time to step out of the nonsense and political "dance".....and working for no wages many times...
This is just an example of how statements and facts got turned around and used as retalliation,and slanderous character attacks on MZ and JL This person wouldn't tell the truth and that's too bad..sadly .a real flaw in character.
It will only be publicized if she wins, otherwise, don't expect to hear anything on it. When/if she does win, it will be Section A, above the fold news...except if the Gazette thinks it will tarnish the Democratic Party.
Tyranny and the Rule of Prosecutors by William L. Anderson
Recently by William L. Anderson: Linda Kelly’s Inferno
Several years ago, James Bovard wrote that large numbers of Americans working in government positions simply are not subject to obeying laws that other Americans must follow – or go to prison. Lest anyone doubt what he says, the recent recommendation by a special prosecutor investigating misconduct by the U.S. Department of Justice in the trial of the late Ted Stevens should provide ample proof that if one is a government lawyer, then one is not subject to the law.
The Stevens trial two years ago in which the then-Alaska U.S. Senator was tried and convicted on corruption charges turned out to be a farce. While it is true that Stevens really was the very symbol of "crony capitalism" and pork-barrel spending, nonetheless what federal prosecutors did was reprehensible in gaining the conviction.
According to the report, prosecutors knowingly lied, withheld exculpatory evidence, and managed to make sure that the Republican would be tried in D.C. and judged by a jury of Democrats. In other words, the trial was a farce from the beginning, as often is the case in federal criminal law.
In his investigation of the government’s conduct (which resulted in the guilty verdict being thrown out), Special Prosecutor Henry F. Schuelke III wrote that the very prosecution was "permeated by systematic concealment of significant exculpatory evidence which would have independently corroborated his defense and his testimony, and seriously damaged the testimony and credibility of the government’s key witness." In other words, prosecutors knew exactly what they were doing: breaking the law.
However, despite the fact that these government agents knowingly and systematically defied the law, the special prosecutor has declared that they should not face any criminal charges because…the trial judge "did not issue a clear order telling them to properly handle evidence and witnesses." That is correct: because the judge did not remind officers of the court that they were to obey the law, and especially the law as interpreted in the U.S. Supreme Court’s 1963 Brady v. Maryland ruling, people who already knew the law and had been trained in the law but deliberately chose to disobey it will not be punished.
Furthermore, the courts have ruled on a number of occasions that police and prosecutors cannot be held liable when they are ignorant of the law but they make wrongful arrests. (That is, arrest someone who police thought was violating a law, but it turns out the police were wrong about the law.) In other words, for police and prosecutor, ignorance of the law IS an excuse, a get-out-of-jail-for-free card.
Contrast this recommendation with how everyone else in American is treated when it comes to alleged breaking of the law. It turns out that the standard line "ignorance of the law is no excuse" only applies to people who would be most likely not to know the law or even know a particular law or regulation existed. Furthermore, the courts have ruled on a number of occasions that the doctrine of mens rea, once the bedrock of Anglo-American criminal law, no longer applies, as intent now is irrelevant, at least for people who are not employed in the "criminal justice" system.
Take the federal prosecutors in the Stevens case, for example. All of them are law school graduates, and Brady is taught in every class on criminal law. Furthermore, they are required to take regular classes throughout the years, and Brady is a staple of that training.
I will go further. Each prosecutor in the Stevens case knew the Brady requirements and knew them better than the typical layperson or journalist, and I will guarantee that when they were violating Brady during the evidence-gathering stage and during the trial, they knew down to their socks they were violating the law and did it anyway. To make matters worse, they had strong evidence in their possession that their key witness had serious credibility problems, which is a nice way to say that the prosecutors knowingly suborned perjury, which is a felony.
Lest one thinks I exaggerate, Schuelke’s report declared that his investigators "found evidence of concealment and serious misconduct that was previously unknown and almost certainly would never have been revealed — at least to the court and to the public — but for their exhaustive investigation." In other words, prosecutors did not just fail to turn over the evidence; they made specific efforts to hide it, which violates statues against obstruction of justice, another felony.
Yet, the government investigator then declares that all should be ignored because the trial judge did not specifically tell prosecutors that they are supposed to both know the law and then obey it. That is not a privilege given to the rest of us.
No, the readers of this article, according to U.S. courts, are supposed to know literally every law that Congress and various state legislatures, not to mention local governments, pass every year, as well as every other law that ever has been placed on the books anywhere in the USA. Forget that we are dealing with hundreds of thousands of statutes; you, dear reader, are supposed to be intimately familiar with the law.
If you wish to find a way out of this predicament, however, the solution is before you: find employment as a police officer, a prosecutor, or a judge and you can wallow in lawbreaking and legal ignorance to your heart’s content, and the courts will back you.
The irony is that Schuelke’s investigation and report is being heralded as a triumph of the "ethics" of those who enforce the laws of this country. You see, we are told, no one is above the law. Well, almost no one. The people who more than anyone else should be held to the highest standards of the law are the ones who really are above it.
Tyranny exists when certain people are permitted to act in a lawless manner while forcing others to obey ridiculous and oppressive laws. Lest anyone believe that such a situation exists only in faraway countries where soldiers goose-step and dictators have funny moustaches, think again. What Schuelke has done is not to destroy tyranny, but to expand it, giving prosecutors literally a free pass to lie and eviscerate the very laws they claim to enforce, all in the name of "justice."
November 24, 2011
William L. Anderson, Ph.D. [send him mail], teaches economics at Frostburg State University in Maryland, and is an adjunct scholar of the Ludwig von Mises Institute. He also is a consultant with American Economic Services. Visit his blog.
Now, I say that we let her win, and we need to go ahead and take twice as much as is actually won in the lawsuit from the town drama queen's pay in the budget to pay for other lawsuits that the town may need to pay for.
When the INSANE are running the ASYLUM In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the rule. -- Friedrich Nietzsche
“How fortunate for those in power that people never think.” Adolph Hitler
Wonderfull, This is so typical. And for 500 bucks come on now..... I have spent $12500.0 defending myself agains false arrest and assault and I refuse to sue the town because the town will only make you guys pay it. Oh but its probably a pricniple thing.
We didnt come this far to get this far. random 12 year old
A slave is someone that waits for someone else to free him. Ezra Pound
It seems that Supervisor DelGallo has a track record of not paying for things --- not paying for a monument that he promised to donate, not paying a town employee for hours that she worked , etc. I wonder if he would let anyone get away with not paying him for a pool that he put in --- I doubt it.
George Amedore & Christian Klueg for NYS Senate 2016 Pete Vroman for State Assembly 2016[/size][/color]
"For this is what America is all about. It is the uncrossed desert and the unclimbed ridge. It is the star that is not reached and the harvest that is sleeping in the unplowed ground." Lyndon Baines Johnson
Really what did he not pay for? i have never know him to be a non payer. So if he was frugal with tax payer fed notes it probly a good thing Im sure you would pay for one of his pools he does a fine job on them.
all I know is there is two side to a story. sometime more,,, heheheh Did she win the suit?
Instead of b1tchin over whos gonna win the war we can do better by trying to solve the problem. But first we gotta indentify the problem accuratly.
We didnt come this far to get this far. random 12 year old
A slave is someone that waits for someone else to free him. Ezra Pound
The problem has been identified...but no one has the guts to do anything to have stopped the abuse of so-called power that the newly elected TC had/has......this person is in deep with the Dems that support her in anything that she needs or wants....
The story/problem is known by the TB and Mr. DelGallo.....he had no control over what happened at the Sr Center because of the TB and others embedded in politics....The Town does not owe her money...The Town owes monies to others who worked at the Center and regardless of what has been rumored, worked their butts off...Get a hold of the Proceedures the TB passed and you will see how that Center became a political arena for this person....along with the goings on e.g., fundraiser for someone who is not in dire straits....rules that were for only 2 employees and not a certain someone...a personal vendetta for one of the employees from the beginning of 2010....lies regarding theft of money, character assasination, slander, and disrespect and insubordination to FDG....destruction of Town property.. ..expenses and money spent over the top.....and when hours were cut for 3 employees....only 2 were penalized big time.....where did the unspent budget money go????
Grievances filed formally and investigated and the outcome and resolve was never accomplished....WHY??? There is much documentation and it did nothing.....and so this person can live with herself, knowing how corrupt she is....her own personal agenda...a real tyrannical person.
These are the problems that will never been solved bacause of the NEW REGIME who will protect any fraud and injustice committed....They all come from the same mold......corrupt and devious and will cover each other's you know what...
AND THIS IS WHAT YOU CALL DEMOCRACY......WE ARE NOW IN A POLICE STATE.....
Logged
